Cargando…

Heparin coating in biodegradable ureteral stents does not decrease bacterial colonization—assessment in ureteral stricture endourological treatment in animal model

BACKGROUND: We assessed an antireflux biodegradable heparin-coated ureteral stent (BraidStent(®)-H) in an animal model comparative study after endoscopic treatment of ureteral strictures. METHODS: A total of 24 female pigs underwent initial endoscopic, nephrosonographic, and contrast fluoroscopy ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soria, Federico, de La Cruz, Julia E., Fernandez, Tomás, Budia, Alberto, Serrano, Álvaro, Sanchez-Margallo, Francisco M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968658
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-19
_version_ 1783688867840262144
author Soria, Federico
de La Cruz, Julia E.
Fernandez, Tomás
Budia, Alberto
Serrano, Álvaro
Sanchez-Margallo, Francisco M.
author_facet Soria, Federico
de La Cruz, Julia E.
Fernandez, Tomás
Budia, Alberto
Serrano, Álvaro
Sanchez-Margallo, Francisco M.
author_sort Soria, Federico
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We assessed an antireflux biodegradable heparin-coated ureteral stent (BraidStent(®)-H) in an animal model comparative study after endoscopic treatment of ureteral strictures. METHODS: A total of 24 female pigs underwent initial endoscopic, nephrosonographic, and contrast fluoroscopy assessment of the urinary tract. Afterward, unilateral laparoscopic ureteral stricture model was performed. Three weeks later, the animals underwent laser endoureterotomy and were randomly assigned to Group-I, in which a double-pigtail stent was placed for 6 weeks, or Group-II, in which a BraidStent®-H was placed. Follow-up was carried out by ultrasonography, contrast fluoroscopy, ureteroscopy, urinalysis and bacteriuria assessment at 3, 6, 12 and 5 months. Finally, a pathological study of the urinary system was performed. RESULTS: There were no animals in Group-II with vesicoureteral reflux, with significance at 6 weeks with Group-I. Distal ureteral peristalsis was maintained in 50–75% in Group-II at 1–6 weeks. The 91.7% of stents in Group-II were degraded between 3–6 weeks, without obstructive fragments. Bacteriuria in Group II was 33.3–50% at 3 and 6 weeks. The global success rate by groups was 91.6% and 87.5% in groups I and II, respectively, with no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: BraidStent(®)-H has been shown to be as efficacious as current ureteral stents in the treatment of benign ureteral strictures following laser endoureterotomy. In addition, it reduces the morbidity associated with current stents and has a homogeneous and predictable degradation rate of about 6 weeks, with no obstructive fragments. Future studies are required to improve the antibacterial coating to reduce BraidStent(®)-H contamination in view of the results obtained with the heparin coating.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8100852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81008522021-05-07 Heparin coating in biodegradable ureteral stents does not decrease bacterial colonization—assessment in ureteral stricture endourological treatment in animal model Soria, Federico de La Cruz, Julia E. Fernandez, Tomás Budia, Alberto Serrano, Álvaro Sanchez-Margallo, Francisco M. Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: We assessed an antireflux biodegradable heparin-coated ureteral stent (BraidStent(®)-H) in an animal model comparative study after endoscopic treatment of ureteral strictures. METHODS: A total of 24 female pigs underwent initial endoscopic, nephrosonographic, and contrast fluoroscopy assessment of the urinary tract. Afterward, unilateral laparoscopic ureteral stricture model was performed. Three weeks later, the animals underwent laser endoureterotomy and were randomly assigned to Group-I, in which a double-pigtail stent was placed for 6 weeks, or Group-II, in which a BraidStent®-H was placed. Follow-up was carried out by ultrasonography, contrast fluoroscopy, ureteroscopy, urinalysis and bacteriuria assessment at 3, 6, 12 and 5 months. Finally, a pathological study of the urinary system was performed. RESULTS: There were no animals in Group-II with vesicoureteral reflux, with significance at 6 weeks with Group-I. Distal ureteral peristalsis was maintained in 50–75% in Group-II at 1–6 weeks. The 91.7% of stents in Group-II were degraded between 3–6 weeks, without obstructive fragments. Bacteriuria in Group II was 33.3–50% at 3 and 6 weeks. The global success rate by groups was 91.6% and 87.5% in groups I and II, respectively, with no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: BraidStent(®)-H has been shown to be as efficacious as current ureteral stents in the treatment of benign ureteral strictures following laser endoureterotomy. In addition, it reduces the morbidity associated with current stents and has a homogeneous and predictable degradation rate of about 6 weeks, with no obstructive fragments. Future studies are required to improve the antibacterial coating to reduce BraidStent(®)-H contamination in view of the results obtained with the heparin coating. AME Publishing Company 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8100852/ /pubmed/33968658 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-19 Text en 2021 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Soria, Federico
de La Cruz, Julia E.
Fernandez, Tomás
Budia, Alberto
Serrano, Álvaro
Sanchez-Margallo, Francisco M.
Heparin coating in biodegradable ureteral stents does not decrease bacterial colonization—assessment in ureteral stricture endourological treatment in animal model
title Heparin coating in biodegradable ureteral stents does not decrease bacterial colonization—assessment in ureteral stricture endourological treatment in animal model
title_full Heparin coating in biodegradable ureteral stents does not decrease bacterial colonization—assessment in ureteral stricture endourological treatment in animal model
title_fullStr Heparin coating in biodegradable ureteral stents does not decrease bacterial colonization—assessment in ureteral stricture endourological treatment in animal model
title_full_unstemmed Heparin coating in biodegradable ureteral stents does not decrease bacterial colonization—assessment in ureteral stricture endourological treatment in animal model
title_short Heparin coating in biodegradable ureteral stents does not decrease bacterial colonization—assessment in ureteral stricture endourological treatment in animal model
title_sort heparin coating in biodegradable ureteral stents does not decrease bacterial colonization—assessment in ureteral stricture endourological treatment in animal model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968658
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-19
work_keys_str_mv AT soriafederico heparincoatinginbiodegradableureteralstentsdoesnotdecreasebacterialcolonizationassessmentinureteralstrictureendourologicaltreatmentinanimalmodel
AT delacruzjuliae heparincoatinginbiodegradableureteralstentsdoesnotdecreasebacterialcolonizationassessmentinureteralstrictureendourologicaltreatmentinanimalmodel
AT fernandeztomas heparincoatinginbiodegradableureteralstentsdoesnotdecreasebacterialcolonizationassessmentinureteralstrictureendourologicaltreatmentinanimalmodel
AT budiaalberto heparincoatinginbiodegradableureteralstentsdoesnotdecreasebacterialcolonizationassessmentinureteralstrictureendourologicaltreatmentinanimalmodel
AT serranoalvaro heparincoatinginbiodegradableureteralstentsdoesnotdecreasebacterialcolonizationassessmentinureteralstrictureendourologicaltreatmentinanimalmodel
AT sanchezmargallofranciscom heparincoatinginbiodegradableureteralstentsdoesnotdecreasebacterialcolonizationassessmentinureteralstrictureendourologicaltreatmentinanimalmodel