Cargando…
Stone removing efficiency and safety comparison between single use ureteroscope and reusable ureteroscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Urologists are gradually beginning to use single-use ureteroscopes (sufURSs), despite a lack of high-level evidence as to their efficacy and safety. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (no. CRD42020181808). METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library d...
Autores principales: | Ma, Yu-Cheng, Jian, Zhong-Yu, Jin, Xi, Li, Hong, Wang, Kun-Jie |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968651 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1399 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison Between Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Upper Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Meng, Chunyang, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of single-use and reusable flexible ureteroscope for renal stone management: a pooled analysis of 772 patients
por: Li, Yongchao, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of Flexible Ureteroscope Performance between Reusable and Single-Use Models
por: Bragaru, Marius, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Use and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes for Renal Stone Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Jun, Dae Young, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Disposable versus Reusable Ureteroscopes: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Comparison
por: Bozzini, Giorgio, et al.
Publicado: (2021)