Cargando…

Acceptance, Barriers, and Future Preferences of Mobile Health Among Patients Receiving Trauma and Orthopedic Surgical Care: Paper-Based Survey in a Prospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND: Smartphones have become an essential part of everyday life and it is undeniable that apps offer enormous opportunities for dealing with future challenges in public health. Nevertheless, the exact patient requirements for medical apps in the field of orthopedic and trauma surgery are curr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reinecke, Felix, Dittrich, Florian, Dudda, Marcel, Stang, Andreas, Polan, Christina, Müller, Roman, Beck, Paula, Kauther, Max Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33881401
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23784
_version_ 1783688873012887552
author Reinecke, Felix
Dittrich, Florian
Dudda, Marcel
Stang, Andreas
Polan, Christina
Müller, Roman
Beck, Paula
Kauther, Max Daniel
author_facet Reinecke, Felix
Dittrich, Florian
Dudda, Marcel
Stang, Andreas
Polan, Christina
Müller, Roman
Beck, Paula
Kauther, Max Daniel
author_sort Reinecke, Felix
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Smartphones have become an essential part of everyday life and it is undeniable that apps offer enormous opportunities for dealing with future challenges in public health. Nevertheless, the exact patient requirements for medical apps in the field of orthopedic and trauma surgery are currently unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to define target groups, evaluate patient requirements, and the potential and pitfalls regarding medical apps specific for patients receiving orthopedic and trauma surgical care. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted between August 2018 and December 2019 at a German trauma center and 3 trauma surgery/orthopedic practices. A paper-based survey consisting of 15 questions evaluated information regarding smartphone and medical app usage behavior. In addition, suggested app functions were rated using Likert scales. Descriptive statistics and binary log-binomial regression were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1055 questionnaires were included in our statistical analysis. Approximately 89.57% (945/1055) of the patients in this study owned a smartphone. Smartphone ownership probability decreased with every decade of life and increased with higher levels of education. Medical information was obtained via mobile web access by 62.65% (661/1055) of the patients; this correlated with smartphone ownership in regard to age and educational level. Only 11.18% (118/1055) of the patients reported previous medical app usage, and 3.50% (37/1055) of the patients received an app recommendation from a physician. More than half (594/1055, 56.30%) of the patients were unwilling to pay for a medical app. The highest rated app functions were information about medication, behavioral guidelines, and medical record archival. An improved treatment experience was reported through the suggested app features by 71.18% (751/1055) of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile devices are a widely used source of information for medical content, but only a minority of the population reported previous medical app usage. The main target group for medical apps among patients receiving orthopedic and trauma surgical care tends to be the younger population, which results in a danger of excluding fringe groups, especially the older adults. Education seems to be one of the most important pull factors to use smartphones or a mobile web connection to obtain health information. Medical apps primarily focusing on an optimized patient education and flow of information seem to have the potential to support patients in health issues, at least in their subjective perception. For future target group–oriented app developments, further evidence on the clinical application, feasibility, and acceptance of app usage are necessary in order to avoid patient endangerment and to limit socioeconomic costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8100880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81008802021-05-07 Acceptance, Barriers, and Future Preferences of Mobile Health Among Patients Receiving Trauma and Orthopedic Surgical Care: Paper-Based Survey in a Prospective Multicenter Study Reinecke, Felix Dittrich, Florian Dudda, Marcel Stang, Andreas Polan, Christina Müller, Roman Beck, Paula Kauther, Max Daniel JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Smartphones have become an essential part of everyday life and it is undeniable that apps offer enormous opportunities for dealing with future challenges in public health. Nevertheless, the exact patient requirements for medical apps in the field of orthopedic and trauma surgery are currently unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to define target groups, evaluate patient requirements, and the potential and pitfalls regarding medical apps specific for patients receiving orthopedic and trauma surgical care. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted between August 2018 and December 2019 at a German trauma center and 3 trauma surgery/orthopedic practices. A paper-based survey consisting of 15 questions evaluated information regarding smartphone and medical app usage behavior. In addition, suggested app functions were rated using Likert scales. Descriptive statistics and binary log-binomial regression were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1055 questionnaires were included in our statistical analysis. Approximately 89.57% (945/1055) of the patients in this study owned a smartphone. Smartphone ownership probability decreased with every decade of life and increased with higher levels of education. Medical information was obtained via mobile web access by 62.65% (661/1055) of the patients; this correlated with smartphone ownership in regard to age and educational level. Only 11.18% (118/1055) of the patients reported previous medical app usage, and 3.50% (37/1055) of the patients received an app recommendation from a physician. More than half (594/1055, 56.30%) of the patients were unwilling to pay for a medical app. The highest rated app functions were information about medication, behavioral guidelines, and medical record archival. An improved treatment experience was reported through the suggested app features by 71.18% (751/1055) of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile devices are a widely used source of information for medical content, but only a minority of the population reported previous medical app usage. The main target group for medical apps among patients receiving orthopedic and trauma surgical care tends to be the younger population, which results in a danger of excluding fringe groups, especially the older adults. Education seems to be one of the most important pull factors to use smartphones or a mobile web connection to obtain health information. Medical apps primarily focusing on an optimized patient education and flow of information seem to have the potential to support patients in health issues, at least in their subjective perception. For future target group–oriented app developments, further evidence on the clinical application, feasibility, and acceptance of app usage are necessary in order to avoid patient endangerment and to limit socioeconomic costs. JMIR Publications 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8100880/ /pubmed/33881401 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23784 Text en ©Felix Reinecke, Florian Dittrich, Marcel Dudda, Andreas Stang, Christina Polan, Roman Müller, Paula Beck, Max Daniel Kauther. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 21.04.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Reinecke, Felix
Dittrich, Florian
Dudda, Marcel
Stang, Andreas
Polan, Christina
Müller, Roman
Beck, Paula
Kauther, Max Daniel
Acceptance, Barriers, and Future Preferences of Mobile Health Among Patients Receiving Trauma and Orthopedic Surgical Care: Paper-Based Survey in a Prospective Multicenter Study
title Acceptance, Barriers, and Future Preferences of Mobile Health Among Patients Receiving Trauma and Orthopedic Surgical Care: Paper-Based Survey in a Prospective Multicenter Study
title_full Acceptance, Barriers, and Future Preferences of Mobile Health Among Patients Receiving Trauma and Orthopedic Surgical Care: Paper-Based Survey in a Prospective Multicenter Study
title_fullStr Acceptance, Barriers, and Future Preferences of Mobile Health Among Patients Receiving Trauma and Orthopedic Surgical Care: Paper-Based Survey in a Prospective Multicenter Study
title_full_unstemmed Acceptance, Barriers, and Future Preferences of Mobile Health Among Patients Receiving Trauma and Orthopedic Surgical Care: Paper-Based Survey in a Prospective Multicenter Study
title_short Acceptance, Barriers, and Future Preferences of Mobile Health Among Patients Receiving Trauma and Orthopedic Surgical Care: Paper-Based Survey in a Prospective Multicenter Study
title_sort acceptance, barriers, and future preferences of mobile health among patients receiving trauma and orthopedic surgical care: paper-based survey in a prospective multicenter study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33881401
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23784
work_keys_str_mv AT reineckefelix acceptancebarriersandfuturepreferencesofmobilehealthamongpatientsreceivingtraumaandorthopedicsurgicalcarepaperbasedsurveyinaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT dittrichflorian acceptancebarriersandfuturepreferencesofmobilehealthamongpatientsreceivingtraumaandorthopedicsurgicalcarepaperbasedsurveyinaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT duddamarcel acceptancebarriersandfuturepreferencesofmobilehealthamongpatientsreceivingtraumaandorthopedicsurgicalcarepaperbasedsurveyinaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT stangandreas acceptancebarriersandfuturepreferencesofmobilehealthamongpatientsreceivingtraumaandorthopedicsurgicalcarepaperbasedsurveyinaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT polanchristina acceptancebarriersandfuturepreferencesofmobilehealthamongpatientsreceivingtraumaandorthopedicsurgicalcarepaperbasedsurveyinaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT mullerroman acceptancebarriersandfuturepreferencesofmobilehealthamongpatientsreceivingtraumaandorthopedicsurgicalcarepaperbasedsurveyinaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT beckpaula acceptancebarriersandfuturepreferencesofmobilehealthamongpatientsreceivingtraumaandorthopedicsurgicalcarepaperbasedsurveyinaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT kauthermaxdaniel acceptancebarriersandfuturepreferencesofmobilehealthamongpatientsreceivingtraumaandorthopedicsurgicalcarepaperbasedsurveyinaprospectivemulticenterstudy