Cargando…

Priority setting in the Brazilian emergency medical service: a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)

BACKGROUND: Despite the proven value of multicriteria decision analysis in the health field, there is a lack of studies focused on prioritising victims in the Emergency Medical Service, EMS. With this, and knowing that the decision maker needs a direction on which choice may be the most appropriate,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frazão, Talita D. C., Santos, Ana F. A. dos, Camilo, Deyse G. G., da Costa Júnior, João Florêncio, de Souza, Ricardo P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33957933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01503-z
_version_ 1783688881771642880
author Frazão, Talita D. C.
Santos, Ana F. A. dos
Camilo, Deyse G. G.
da Costa Júnior, João Florêncio
de Souza, Ricardo P.
author_facet Frazão, Talita D. C.
Santos, Ana F. A. dos
Camilo, Deyse G. G.
da Costa Júnior, João Florêncio
de Souza, Ricardo P.
author_sort Frazão, Talita D. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the proven value of multicriteria decision analysis in the health field, there is a lack of studies focused on prioritising victims in the Emergency Medical Service, EMS. With this, and knowing that the decision maker needs a direction on which choice may be the most appropriate, based on different and often conflicting criteria. The current work developed a new model for prioritizing victims of SAMU/192, based on the multicriteria decision methodology, taking into account the scarcity of resources. METHODS: An expert panel and a discussion group were formed, which defined the limits of the problem, and identified the evaluation criteria for choosing a victim, amongst four alternatives illustrated from hypothetical scenarios of emergency situations—clinical and traumatic diseases of absolute priority. For prioritization, an additive mathematical method was used that aggregates criteria in a flexible and interactive version, FITradeoff. RESULTS: The structuring of the problem led the researchers to identify twenty-five evaluation criteria, amongst which ten were essential to guide decisions. As a result, in the simulation of prioritization of four requesting victims in view of the availability of only one ambulance, the proposed model supported the decision by suggesting the prioritization of one of the victims. CONCLUSIONS: This work contributed to the prioritization of victims using multicriteria decision support methodology. Selecting and weighing the criteria in this study indicated that the protocols that guide regulatory physicians do not consider all the criteria for prioritizing victims in an environment of scarcity of resources. Finally, the proposed model can support crucial decision based on a rational and transparent decision-making process that can be applied in other EMS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01503-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8100937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81009372021-05-06 Priority setting in the Brazilian emergency medical service: a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) Frazão, Talita D. C. Santos, Ana F. A. dos Camilo, Deyse G. G. da Costa Júnior, João Florêncio de Souza, Ricardo P. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the proven value of multicriteria decision analysis in the health field, there is a lack of studies focused on prioritising victims in the Emergency Medical Service, EMS. With this, and knowing that the decision maker needs a direction on which choice may be the most appropriate, based on different and often conflicting criteria. The current work developed a new model for prioritizing victims of SAMU/192, based on the multicriteria decision methodology, taking into account the scarcity of resources. METHODS: An expert panel and a discussion group were formed, which defined the limits of the problem, and identified the evaluation criteria for choosing a victim, amongst four alternatives illustrated from hypothetical scenarios of emergency situations—clinical and traumatic diseases of absolute priority. For prioritization, an additive mathematical method was used that aggregates criteria in a flexible and interactive version, FITradeoff. RESULTS: The structuring of the problem led the researchers to identify twenty-five evaluation criteria, amongst which ten were essential to guide decisions. As a result, in the simulation of prioritization of four requesting victims in view of the availability of only one ambulance, the proposed model supported the decision by suggesting the prioritization of one of the victims. CONCLUSIONS: This work contributed to the prioritization of victims using multicriteria decision support methodology. Selecting and weighing the criteria in this study indicated that the protocols that guide regulatory physicians do not consider all the criteria for prioritizing victims in an environment of scarcity of resources. Finally, the proposed model can support crucial decision based on a rational and transparent decision-making process that can be applied in other EMS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01503-z. BioMed Central 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8100937/ /pubmed/33957933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01503-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Frazão, Talita D. C.
Santos, Ana F. A. dos
Camilo, Deyse G. G.
da Costa Júnior, João Florêncio
de Souza, Ricardo P.
Priority setting in the Brazilian emergency medical service: a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)
title Priority setting in the Brazilian emergency medical service: a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)
title_full Priority setting in the Brazilian emergency medical service: a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)
title_fullStr Priority setting in the Brazilian emergency medical service: a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)
title_full_unstemmed Priority setting in the Brazilian emergency medical service: a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)
title_short Priority setting in the Brazilian emergency medical service: a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)
title_sort priority setting in the brazilian emergency medical service: a multi-criteria decision analysis (mcda)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33957933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01503-z
work_keys_str_mv AT frazaotalitadc prioritysettinginthebrazilianemergencymedicalserviceamulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda
AT santosanafados prioritysettinginthebrazilianemergencymedicalserviceamulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda
AT camilodeysegg prioritysettinginthebrazilianemergencymedicalserviceamulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda
AT dacostajuniorjoaoflorencio prioritysettinginthebrazilianemergencymedicalserviceamulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda
AT desouzaricardop prioritysettinginthebrazilianemergencymedicalserviceamulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda