Cargando…
How to bring peer review ghostwriters out of the dark
Early career researchers are frequent and valuable contributors to peer review. Systemic changes that acknowledge this fact would result in ethical co-reviewing, peer reviews of greater quality, and a reduction in peer reviewer burden.
Autores principales: | McDowell, Gary S., Niziolek, Caroline A., Lijek, Rebeccah S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The American Society for Cell Biology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8101444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33720779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E20-10-0642 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts
por: McDowell, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Preprint Peer Review Enhances Undergraduate Biology Students' Disciplinary Literacy and Sense of Belonging in STEM
por: Otto, Josie L., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Being the Ghost in the Machine: A Medical Ghostwriter's Personal View
por: Logdberg, Linda
Publicado: (2011) -
Bringing collections out of the dark
por: Smith, Vincent S., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Ghostwriters in the scientific world
por: Yadav, Sankalp, et al.
Publicado: (2018)