Cargando…
Regional differences in farmers’ preferences for a native bee conservation policy: The case of farming communities in Northern and Eastern Thailand
Evidence points to past bee-mediated crop pollination deficits in Chanthaburi province, Eastern Thailand. Conversely, no such evidence has yet been reported for Chiang Mai province (Northern Thailand), suggesting that wild pollination is delivered there above the requirements of local orchards. Disc...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8101932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33956850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251206 |
_version_ | 1783689028034363392 |
---|---|
author | Narjes, Manuel Ernesto Lippert, Christian |
author_facet | Narjes, Manuel Ernesto Lippert, Christian |
author_sort | Narjes, Manuel Ernesto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evidence points to past bee-mediated crop pollination deficits in Chanthaburi province, Eastern Thailand. Conversely, no such evidence has yet been reported for Chiang Mai province (Northern Thailand), suggesting that wild pollination is delivered there above the requirements of local orchards. Discrete choice experiments (DCE) were conducted to elicit the preferences of pollinator-dependent orchard farmers with regard to three pollinator conservation measures and their possible effects on of native bee populations in each region. We fitted random parameter logit (RPL) models on the resulting data to capture preference heterogeneity and to obtain willingness to pay (WTP) point estimates. To test our results’ robustness, we also inspected for scale heterogeneity by fitting generalized mixed logit (GMXL) models on the pooled and individual datasets. This yielded WTP space estimates (i.e., directly from WTP distributions) and made possible the comparison of farmers’ preferences for a native bee conservation policy in both regions. The results hint at significant WTP differences for some of the conservation policy attributes between both provinces. Furthermore, unobserved contributions to choice seem to have been more random in Chiang Mai. Our analyses also suggest that farmers who engage in bee-related activities are WTP more for a conservation policy that includes bee husbandry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8101932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81019322021-05-17 Regional differences in farmers’ preferences for a native bee conservation policy: The case of farming communities in Northern and Eastern Thailand Narjes, Manuel Ernesto Lippert, Christian PLoS One Research Article Evidence points to past bee-mediated crop pollination deficits in Chanthaburi province, Eastern Thailand. Conversely, no such evidence has yet been reported for Chiang Mai province (Northern Thailand), suggesting that wild pollination is delivered there above the requirements of local orchards. Discrete choice experiments (DCE) were conducted to elicit the preferences of pollinator-dependent orchard farmers with regard to three pollinator conservation measures and their possible effects on of native bee populations in each region. We fitted random parameter logit (RPL) models on the resulting data to capture preference heterogeneity and to obtain willingness to pay (WTP) point estimates. To test our results’ robustness, we also inspected for scale heterogeneity by fitting generalized mixed logit (GMXL) models on the pooled and individual datasets. This yielded WTP space estimates (i.e., directly from WTP distributions) and made possible the comparison of farmers’ preferences for a native bee conservation policy in both regions. The results hint at significant WTP differences for some of the conservation policy attributes between both provinces. Furthermore, unobserved contributions to choice seem to have been more random in Chiang Mai. Our analyses also suggest that farmers who engage in bee-related activities are WTP more for a conservation policy that includes bee husbandry. Public Library of Science 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8101932/ /pubmed/33956850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251206 Text en © 2021 Narjes, Lippert https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Narjes, Manuel Ernesto Lippert, Christian Regional differences in farmers’ preferences for a native bee conservation policy: The case of farming communities in Northern and Eastern Thailand |
title | Regional differences in farmers’ preferences for a native bee conservation policy: The case of farming communities in Northern and Eastern Thailand |
title_full | Regional differences in farmers’ preferences for a native bee conservation policy: The case of farming communities in Northern and Eastern Thailand |
title_fullStr | Regional differences in farmers’ preferences for a native bee conservation policy: The case of farming communities in Northern and Eastern Thailand |
title_full_unstemmed | Regional differences in farmers’ preferences for a native bee conservation policy: The case of farming communities in Northern and Eastern Thailand |
title_short | Regional differences in farmers’ preferences for a native bee conservation policy: The case of farming communities in Northern and Eastern Thailand |
title_sort | regional differences in farmers’ preferences for a native bee conservation policy: the case of farming communities in northern and eastern thailand |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8101932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33956850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT narjesmanuelernesto regionaldifferencesinfarmerspreferencesforanativebeeconservationpolicythecaseoffarmingcommunitiesinnorthernandeasternthailand AT lippertchristian regionaldifferencesinfarmerspreferencesforanativebeeconservationpolicythecaseoffarmingcommunitiesinnorthernandeasternthailand |