Cargando…

Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors

The metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) form a family of neuromodulatory G-protein-coupled receptors that contain both a seven-helix transmembrane domain (TMD) and a large extracellular ligand-binding domain (LBD) which enables stable dimerization. Although numerous studies have revealed varia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thibado, Jordana K, Tano, Jean-Yves, Lee, Joon, Salas-Estrada, Leslie, Provasi, Davide, Strauss, Alexa, Marcelo Lamim Ribeiro, Joao, Xiang, Guoqing, Broichhagen, Johannes, Filizola, Marta, Lohse, Martin J, Levitz, Joshua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33880992
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67027
_version_ 1783689055815335936
author Thibado, Jordana K
Tano, Jean-Yves
Lee, Joon
Salas-Estrada, Leslie
Provasi, Davide
Strauss, Alexa
Marcelo Lamim Ribeiro, Joao
Xiang, Guoqing
Broichhagen, Johannes
Filizola, Marta
Lohse, Martin J
Levitz, Joshua
author_facet Thibado, Jordana K
Tano, Jean-Yves
Lee, Joon
Salas-Estrada, Leslie
Provasi, Davide
Strauss, Alexa
Marcelo Lamim Ribeiro, Joao
Xiang, Guoqing
Broichhagen, Johannes
Filizola, Marta
Lohse, Martin J
Levitz, Joshua
author_sort Thibado, Jordana K
collection PubMed
description The metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) form a family of neuromodulatory G-protein-coupled receptors that contain both a seven-helix transmembrane domain (TMD) and a large extracellular ligand-binding domain (LBD) which enables stable dimerization. Although numerous studies have revealed variability across subtypes in the initial activation steps at the level of LBD dimers, an understanding of inter-TMD interaction and rearrangement remains limited. Here, we use a combination of single molecule fluorescence, molecular dynamics, functional assays, and conformational sensors to reveal that distinct TMD assembly properties drive differences between mGluR subtypes. We uncover a variable region within transmembrane helix 4 (TM4) that contributes to homo- and heterodimerization in a subtype-specific manner and tunes orthosteric, allosteric, and basal activation. We also confirm a critical role for a conserved inter-TM6 interface in stabilizing the active state during orthosteric or allosteric activation. Together this study shows that inter-TMD assembly and dynamic rearrangement drive mGluR function with distinct properties between subtypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8102066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81020662021-05-11 Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors Thibado, Jordana K Tano, Jean-Yves Lee, Joon Salas-Estrada, Leslie Provasi, Davide Strauss, Alexa Marcelo Lamim Ribeiro, Joao Xiang, Guoqing Broichhagen, Johannes Filizola, Marta Lohse, Martin J Levitz, Joshua eLife Neuroscience The metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) form a family of neuromodulatory G-protein-coupled receptors that contain both a seven-helix transmembrane domain (TMD) and a large extracellular ligand-binding domain (LBD) which enables stable dimerization. Although numerous studies have revealed variability across subtypes in the initial activation steps at the level of LBD dimers, an understanding of inter-TMD interaction and rearrangement remains limited. Here, we use a combination of single molecule fluorescence, molecular dynamics, functional assays, and conformational sensors to reveal that distinct TMD assembly properties drive differences between mGluR subtypes. We uncover a variable region within transmembrane helix 4 (TM4) that contributes to homo- and heterodimerization in a subtype-specific manner and tunes orthosteric, allosteric, and basal activation. We also confirm a critical role for a conserved inter-TM6 interface in stabilizing the active state during orthosteric or allosteric activation. Together this study shows that inter-TMD assembly and dynamic rearrangement drive mGluR function with distinct properties between subtypes. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8102066/ /pubmed/33880992 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67027 Text en © 2021, Thibado et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Thibado, Jordana K
Tano, Jean-Yves
Lee, Joon
Salas-Estrada, Leslie
Provasi, Davide
Strauss, Alexa
Marcelo Lamim Ribeiro, Joao
Xiang, Guoqing
Broichhagen, Johannes
Filizola, Marta
Lohse, Martin J
Levitz, Joshua
Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors
title Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors
title_full Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors
title_fullStr Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors
title_full_unstemmed Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors
title_short Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors
title_sort differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33880992
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67027
work_keys_str_mv AT thibadojordanak differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors
AT tanojeanyves differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors
AT leejoon differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors
AT salasestradaleslie differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors
AT provasidavide differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors
AT straussalexa differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors
AT marcelolamimribeirojoao differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors
AT xiangguoqing differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors
AT broichhagenjohannes differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors
AT filizolamarta differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors
AT lohsemartinj differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors
AT levitzjoshua differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors