Cargando…
Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors
The metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) form a family of neuromodulatory G-protein-coupled receptors that contain both a seven-helix transmembrane domain (TMD) and a large extracellular ligand-binding domain (LBD) which enables stable dimerization. Although numerous studies have revealed varia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33880992 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67027 |
_version_ | 1783689055815335936 |
---|---|
author | Thibado, Jordana K Tano, Jean-Yves Lee, Joon Salas-Estrada, Leslie Provasi, Davide Strauss, Alexa Marcelo Lamim Ribeiro, Joao Xiang, Guoqing Broichhagen, Johannes Filizola, Marta Lohse, Martin J Levitz, Joshua |
author_facet | Thibado, Jordana K Tano, Jean-Yves Lee, Joon Salas-Estrada, Leslie Provasi, Davide Strauss, Alexa Marcelo Lamim Ribeiro, Joao Xiang, Guoqing Broichhagen, Johannes Filizola, Marta Lohse, Martin J Levitz, Joshua |
author_sort | Thibado, Jordana K |
collection | PubMed |
description | The metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) form a family of neuromodulatory G-protein-coupled receptors that contain both a seven-helix transmembrane domain (TMD) and a large extracellular ligand-binding domain (LBD) which enables stable dimerization. Although numerous studies have revealed variability across subtypes in the initial activation steps at the level of LBD dimers, an understanding of inter-TMD interaction and rearrangement remains limited. Here, we use a combination of single molecule fluorescence, molecular dynamics, functional assays, and conformational sensors to reveal that distinct TMD assembly properties drive differences between mGluR subtypes. We uncover a variable region within transmembrane helix 4 (TM4) that contributes to homo- and heterodimerization in a subtype-specific manner and tunes orthosteric, allosteric, and basal activation. We also confirm a critical role for a conserved inter-TM6 interface in stabilizing the active state during orthosteric or allosteric activation. Together this study shows that inter-TMD assembly and dynamic rearrangement drive mGluR function with distinct properties between subtypes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8102066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81020662021-05-11 Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors Thibado, Jordana K Tano, Jean-Yves Lee, Joon Salas-Estrada, Leslie Provasi, Davide Strauss, Alexa Marcelo Lamim Ribeiro, Joao Xiang, Guoqing Broichhagen, Johannes Filizola, Marta Lohse, Martin J Levitz, Joshua eLife Neuroscience The metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) form a family of neuromodulatory G-protein-coupled receptors that contain both a seven-helix transmembrane domain (TMD) and a large extracellular ligand-binding domain (LBD) which enables stable dimerization. Although numerous studies have revealed variability across subtypes in the initial activation steps at the level of LBD dimers, an understanding of inter-TMD interaction and rearrangement remains limited. Here, we use a combination of single molecule fluorescence, molecular dynamics, functional assays, and conformational sensors to reveal that distinct TMD assembly properties drive differences between mGluR subtypes. We uncover a variable region within transmembrane helix 4 (TM4) that contributes to homo- and heterodimerization in a subtype-specific manner and tunes orthosteric, allosteric, and basal activation. We also confirm a critical role for a conserved inter-TM6 interface in stabilizing the active state during orthosteric or allosteric activation. Together this study shows that inter-TMD assembly and dynamic rearrangement drive mGluR function with distinct properties between subtypes. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8102066/ /pubmed/33880992 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67027 Text en © 2021, Thibado et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Thibado, Jordana K Tano, Jean-Yves Lee, Joon Salas-Estrada, Leslie Provasi, Davide Strauss, Alexa Marcelo Lamim Ribeiro, Joao Xiang, Guoqing Broichhagen, Johannes Filizola, Marta Lohse, Martin J Levitz, Joshua Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors |
title | Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors |
title_full | Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors |
title_fullStr | Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors |
title_short | Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors |
title_sort | differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33880992 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thibadojordanak differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors AT tanojeanyves differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors AT leejoon differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors AT salasestradaleslie differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors AT provasidavide differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors AT straussalexa differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors AT marcelolamimribeirojoao differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors AT xiangguoqing differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors AT broichhagenjohannes differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors AT filizolamarta differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors AT lohsemartinj differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors AT levitzjoshua differencesininteractionsbetweentransmembranedomainstunetheactivationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptors |