Cargando…
Where Are the Newly Diagnosed HIV Positives in Kenya? Time to Consider Geo-Spatially Guided Targeting at a Finer Scale to Reach the “First 90”
Background: The UNAIDS 90-90-90 Fast-Track targets provide a framework for assessing coverage of HIV testing services (HTS) and awareness of HIV status – the “first 90.” In Kenya, the bulk of HIV testing targets are aligned to the five highest HIV-burden counties. However, we do not know if most of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.503555 |
_version_ | 1783689152417497088 |
---|---|
author | Waruru, Anthony Wamicwe, Joyce Mwangi, Jonathan Achia, Thomas N. O. Zielinski-Gutierrez, Emily Ng'ang'a, Lucy Miruka, Fredrick Yegon, Peter Kimanga, Davies Tobias, James L. Young, Peter W. De Cock, Kevin M. Tylleskär, Thorkild |
author_facet | Waruru, Anthony Wamicwe, Joyce Mwangi, Jonathan Achia, Thomas N. O. Zielinski-Gutierrez, Emily Ng'ang'a, Lucy Miruka, Fredrick Yegon, Peter Kimanga, Davies Tobias, James L. Young, Peter W. De Cock, Kevin M. Tylleskär, Thorkild |
author_sort | Waruru, Anthony |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The UNAIDS 90-90-90 Fast-Track targets provide a framework for assessing coverage of HIV testing services (HTS) and awareness of HIV status – the “first 90.” In Kenya, the bulk of HIV testing targets are aligned to the five highest HIV-burden counties. However, we do not know if most of the new HIV diagnoses are in these five highest-burden counties or elsewhere. Methods: We analyzed facility-level HTS data in Kenya from 1 October 2015 to 30 September 2016 to assess the spatial distribution of newly diagnosed HIV-positives. We used the Moran's Index (Moran's I) to assess global and local spatial auto-correlation of newly diagnosed HIV-positive tests and Kulldorff spatial scan statistics to detect hotspots of newly diagnosed HIV-positive tests. For aggregated data, we used Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations non-parametric rank test to compare absolute numbers across classes. Results: Out of 4,021 HTS sites, 3,969 (98.7%) had geocodes available. Most facilities (3,034, 76.4%), were not spatially autocorrelated for the number of newly diagnosed HIV-positives. For the rest, clustering occurred as follows; 438 (11.0%) were HH, 66 (1.7%) HL, 275 (6.9%) LH, and 156 (3.9%) LL. Of the HH sites, 301 (68.7%) were in high HIV-burden counties. Over half of 123 clusters with a significantly high number of newly diagnosed HIV-infected persons, 73(59.3%) were not in the five highest HIV-burden counties. Clusters with a high number of newly diagnosed persons had twice the number of positives per 1,000,000 tests than clusters with lower numbers (29,856 vs. 14,172). Conclusions: Although high HIV-burden counties contain clusters of sites with a high number of newly diagnosed HIV-infected persons, we detected many such clusters in low-burden counties as well. To expand HTS where most needed and reach the “first 90” targets, geospatial analyses and mapping make it easier to identify and describe localized epidemic patterns in a spatially dispersed epidemic like Kenya's, and consequently, reorient and prioritize HTS strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8102680 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81026802021-05-08 Where Are the Newly Diagnosed HIV Positives in Kenya? Time to Consider Geo-Spatially Guided Targeting at a Finer Scale to Reach the “First 90” Waruru, Anthony Wamicwe, Joyce Mwangi, Jonathan Achia, Thomas N. O. Zielinski-Gutierrez, Emily Ng'ang'a, Lucy Miruka, Fredrick Yegon, Peter Kimanga, Davies Tobias, James L. Young, Peter W. De Cock, Kevin M. Tylleskär, Thorkild Front Public Health Public Health Background: The UNAIDS 90-90-90 Fast-Track targets provide a framework for assessing coverage of HIV testing services (HTS) and awareness of HIV status – the “first 90.” In Kenya, the bulk of HIV testing targets are aligned to the five highest HIV-burden counties. However, we do not know if most of the new HIV diagnoses are in these five highest-burden counties or elsewhere. Methods: We analyzed facility-level HTS data in Kenya from 1 October 2015 to 30 September 2016 to assess the spatial distribution of newly diagnosed HIV-positives. We used the Moran's Index (Moran's I) to assess global and local spatial auto-correlation of newly diagnosed HIV-positive tests and Kulldorff spatial scan statistics to detect hotspots of newly diagnosed HIV-positive tests. For aggregated data, we used Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations non-parametric rank test to compare absolute numbers across classes. Results: Out of 4,021 HTS sites, 3,969 (98.7%) had geocodes available. Most facilities (3,034, 76.4%), were not spatially autocorrelated for the number of newly diagnosed HIV-positives. For the rest, clustering occurred as follows; 438 (11.0%) were HH, 66 (1.7%) HL, 275 (6.9%) LH, and 156 (3.9%) LL. Of the HH sites, 301 (68.7%) were in high HIV-burden counties. Over half of 123 clusters with a significantly high number of newly diagnosed HIV-infected persons, 73(59.3%) were not in the five highest HIV-burden counties. Clusters with a high number of newly diagnosed persons had twice the number of positives per 1,000,000 tests than clusters with lower numbers (29,856 vs. 14,172). Conclusions: Although high HIV-burden counties contain clusters of sites with a high number of newly diagnosed HIV-infected persons, we detected many such clusters in low-burden counties as well. To expand HTS where most needed and reach the “first 90” targets, geospatial analyses and mapping make it easier to identify and describe localized epidemic patterns in a spatially dispersed epidemic like Kenya's, and consequently, reorient and prioritize HTS strategies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8102680/ /pubmed/33968864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.503555 Text en Copyright © 2021 Waruru, Wamicwe, Mwangi, Achia, Zielinski-Gutierrez, Ng'ang'a, Miruka, Yegon, Kimanga, Tobias, Young, De Cock and Tylleskär. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Waruru, Anthony Wamicwe, Joyce Mwangi, Jonathan Achia, Thomas N. O. Zielinski-Gutierrez, Emily Ng'ang'a, Lucy Miruka, Fredrick Yegon, Peter Kimanga, Davies Tobias, James L. Young, Peter W. De Cock, Kevin M. Tylleskär, Thorkild Where Are the Newly Diagnosed HIV Positives in Kenya? Time to Consider Geo-Spatially Guided Targeting at a Finer Scale to Reach the “First 90” |
title | Where Are the Newly Diagnosed HIV Positives in Kenya? Time to Consider Geo-Spatially Guided Targeting at a Finer Scale to Reach the “First 90” |
title_full | Where Are the Newly Diagnosed HIV Positives in Kenya? Time to Consider Geo-Spatially Guided Targeting at a Finer Scale to Reach the “First 90” |
title_fullStr | Where Are the Newly Diagnosed HIV Positives in Kenya? Time to Consider Geo-Spatially Guided Targeting at a Finer Scale to Reach the “First 90” |
title_full_unstemmed | Where Are the Newly Diagnosed HIV Positives in Kenya? Time to Consider Geo-Spatially Guided Targeting at a Finer Scale to Reach the “First 90” |
title_short | Where Are the Newly Diagnosed HIV Positives in Kenya? Time to Consider Geo-Spatially Guided Targeting at a Finer Scale to Reach the “First 90” |
title_sort | where are the newly diagnosed hiv positives in kenya? time to consider geo-spatially guided targeting at a finer scale to reach the “first 90” |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.503555 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waruruanthony wherearethenewlydiagnosedhivpositivesinkenyatimetoconsidergeospatiallyguidedtargetingatafinerscaletoreachthefirst90 AT wamicwejoyce wherearethenewlydiagnosedhivpositivesinkenyatimetoconsidergeospatiallyguidedtargetingatafinerscaletoreachthefirst90 AT mwangijonathan wherearethenewlydiagnosedhivpositivesinkenyatimetoconsidergeospatiallyguidedtargetingatafinerscaletoreachthefirst90 AT achiathomasno wherearethenewlydiagnosedhivpositivesinkenyatimetoconsidergeospatiallyguidedtargetingatafinerscaletoreachthefirst90 AT zielinskigutierrezemily wherearethenewlydiagnosedhivpositivesinkenyatimetoconsidergeospatiallyguidedtargetingatafinerscaletoreachthefirst90 AT ngangalucy wherearethenewlydiagnosedhivpositivesinkenyatimetoconsidergeospatiallyguidedtargetingatafinerscaletoreachthefirst90 AT mirukafredrick wherearethenewlydiagnosedhivpositivesinkenyatimetoconsidergeospatiallyguidedtargetingatafinerscaletoreachthefirst90 AT yegonpeter wherearethenewlydiagnosedhivpositivesinkenyatimetoconsidergeospatiallyguidedtargetingatafinerscaletoreachthefirst90 AT kimangadavies wherearethenewlydiagnosedhivpositivesinkenyatimetoconsidergeospatiallyguidedtargetingatafinerscaletoreachthefirst90 AT tobiasjamesl wherearethenewlydiagnosedhivpositivesinkenyatimetoconsidergeospatiallyguidedtargetingatafinerscaletoreachthefirst90 AT youngpeterw wherearethenewlydiagnosedhivpositivesinkenyatimetoconsidergeospatiallyguidedtargetingatafinerscaletoreachthefirst90 AT decockkevinm wherearethenewlydiagnosedhivpositivesinkenyatimetoconsidergeospatiallyguidedtargetingatafinerscaletoreachthefirst90 AT tylleskarthorkild wherearethenewlydiagnosedhivpositivesinkenyatimetoconsidergeospatiallyguidedtargetingatafinerscaletoreachthefirst90 |