Cargando…

Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake in low-and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The proportion of incident cases of HPV-attributable cancers is highest in the low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) but many are yet to initiate HPV vaccination programs. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the uptake of HPV vaccination in LMICs at the beginning of the global...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dorji, Thinley, Nopsopon, Tanawin, Tamang, Saran Tenzin, Pongpirul, Krit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100836
_version_ 1783689157931958272
author Dorji, Thinley
Nopsopon, Tanawin
Tamang, Saran Tenzin
Pongpirul, Krit
author_facet Dorji, Thinley
Nopsopon, Tanawin
Tamang, Saran Tenzin
Pongpirul, Krit
author_sort Dorji, Thinley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The proportion of incident cases of HPV-attributable cancers is highest in the low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) but many are yet to initiate HPV vaccination programs. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the uptake of HPV vaccination in LMICs at the beginning of the global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer and describes the gaps and challenges. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for observational studies that reported the uptake of HPV vaccination until October 2020. The meta-analysis was done using a random-effects model to assess the pooled estimate of HPV uptake. CRD42021218429 FINDINGS: During 2008–2020, an estimated 3.3 million females received at least one dose of HPV vaccine with 61.69% of the target population vaccinated. In countries with high uptake, the pooled estimate of uptake was higher in females than males (45.48% vs 8.45%) and showed significant decline in 2015–2020 compared to 2006–2014 (89.03% vs 41.48%). In countries with low uptake, the estimate of uptake was low in both males and females (5.31% vs 2.93%) and showed increase in uptake in 2015–2020 compared to 2006–2014 (0.76% vs 5.22%). In countries with high uptake, compared to routine programs, the estimate was higher when delivered through demonstration programs (89.94% vs 59.74%). INTERPRETATION: The major concern was a significant drop in the uptake in countries that started with high uptake, challenges in the maintenance of vaccine uptake, sustainability of funding and the lack of standard monitoring and reporting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8102703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81027032021-05-14 Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake in low-and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis Dorji, Thinley Nopsopon, Tanawin Tamang, Saran Tenzin Pongpirul, Krit EClinicalMedicine Research Paper BACKGROUND: The proportion of incident cases of HPV-attributable cancers is highest in the low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) but many are yet to initiate HPV vaccination programs. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the uptake of HPV vaccination in LMICs at the beginning of the global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer and describes the gaps and challenges. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for observational studies that reported the uptake of HPV vaccination until October 2020. The meta-analysis was done using a random-effects model to assess the pooled estimate of HPV uptake. CRD42021218429 FINDINGS: During 2008–2020, an estimated 3.3 million females received at least one dose of HPV vaccine with 61.69% of the target population vaccinated. In countries with high uptake, the pooled estimate of uptake was higher in females than males (45.48% vs 8.45%) and showed significant decline in 2015–2020 compared to 2006–2014 (89.03% vs 41.48%). In countries with low uptake, the estimate of uptake was low in both males and females (5.31% vs 2.93%) and showed increase in uptake in 2015–2020 compared to 2006–2014 (0.76% vs 5.22%). In countries with high uptake, compared to routine programs, the estimate was higher when delivered through demonstration programs (89.94% vs 59.74%). INTERPRETATION: The major concern was a significant drop in the uptake in countries that started with high uptake, challenges in the maintenance of vaccine uptake, sustainability of funding and the lack of standard monitoring and reporting. Elsevier 2021-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8102703/ /pubmed/33997733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100836 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Dorji, Thinley
Nopsopon, Tanawin
Tamang, Saran Tenzin
Pongpirul, Krit
Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake in low-and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis
title Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake in low-and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis
title_full Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake in low-and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake in low-and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake in low-and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis
title_short Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake in low-and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis
title_sort human papillomavirus vaccination uptake in low-and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100836
work_keys_str_mv AT dorjithinley humanpapillomavirusvaccinationuptakeinlowandmiddleincomecountriesametaanalysis
AT nopsopontanawin humanpapillomavirusvaccinationuptakeinlowandmiddleincomecountriesametaanalysis
AT tamangsarantenzin humanpapillomavirusvaccinationuptakeinlowandmiddleincomecountriesametaanalysis
AT pongpirulkrit humanpapillomavirusvaccinationuptakeinlowandmiddleincomecountriesametaanalysis