Cargando…

Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials

OBJECTIVE: Motor evoked potentials (MEP), obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are a common tool in clinical research and diagnostic. Nevertheless, reports regarding the influence of filter settings on MEP are sparse. Here, we compared MEP amplitudes and signal to noise ratio (SNR) us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nikolov, Petyo, Hassan, Shady S., Schnitzler, Alfons, Groiss, Stefan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33967684
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.665258
_version_ 1783689164335611904
author Nikolov, Petyo
Hassan, Shady S.
Schnitzler, Alfons
Groiss, Stefan J.
author_facet Nikolov, Petyo
Hassan, Shady S.
Schnitzler, Alfons
Groiss, Stefan J.
author_sort Nikolov, Petyo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Motor evoked potentials (MEP), obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are a common tool in clinical research and diagnostic. Nevertheless, reports regarding the influence of filter settings on MEP are sparse. Here, we compared MEP amplitudes and signal to noise ratio (SNR) using multiple high pass filter (HPF) and notch filter settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Recruitment curves were obtained with HPF settings varied at 10, 20, 50, and 100 Hz. The four HPF settings were tested both with and without 50 Hz active notch filter. Low pass filter was kept constant at 5 kHz. RESULTS: MEP amplitudes with HPF at 10 and 20 Hz were significantly higher than at 100 Hz, regardless of the notch filter. However, SNR did not differ among HPF settings. An active notch filter significantly improved SNR. CONCLUSION: The reduction in MEP amplitudes with HPF above 20 Hz may be due to noise reduction, since the different HPF conditions did not alter SNR. Thus, higher HPF above 50 Hz may be an option to reduce noise, the use of a notch filter may even improve SNR. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings are relevant for the selection of filter settings and might be of importance to any researcher who utilizes TMS-MEP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8102734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81027342021-05-08 Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials Nikolov, Petyo Hassan, Shady S. Schnitzler, Alfons Groiss, Stefan J. Front Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: Motor evoked potentials (MEP), obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are a common tool in clinical research and diagnostic. Nevertheless, reports regarding the influence of filter settings on MEP are sparse. Here, we compared MEP amplitudes and signal to noise ratio (SNR) using multiple high pass filter (HPF) and notch filter settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Recruitment curves were obtained with HPF settings varied at 10, 20, 50, and 100 Hz. The four HPF settings were tested both with and without 50 Hz active notch filter. Low pass filter was kept constant at 5 kHz. RESULTS: MEP amplitudes with HPF at 10 and 20 Hz were significantly higher than at 100 Hz, regardless of the notch filter. However, SNR did not differ among HPF settings. An active notch filter significantly improved SNR. CONCLUSION: The reduction in MEP amplitudes with HPF above 20 Hz may be due to noise reduction, since the different HPF conditions did not alter SNR. Thus, higher HPF above 50 Hz may be an option to reduce noise, the use of a notch filter may even improve SNR. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings are relevant for the selection of filter settings and might be of importance to any researcher who utilizes TMS-MEP. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8102734/ /pubmed/33967684 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.665258 Text en Copyright © 2021 Nikolov, Hassan, Schnitzler and Groiss. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Nikolov, Petyo
Hassan, Shady S.
Schnitzler, Alfons
Groiss, Stefan J.
Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials
title Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials
title_full Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials
title_fullStr Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials
title_full_unstemmed Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials
title_short Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials
title_sort influence of high pass filter settings on motor evoked potentials
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33967684
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.665258
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolovpetyo influenceofhighpassfiltersettingsonmotorevokedpotentials
AT hassanshadys influenceofhighpassfiltersettingsonmotorevokedpotentials
AT schnitzleralfons influenceofhighpassfiltersettingsonmotorevokedpotentials
AT groissstefanj influenceofhighpassfiltersettingsonmotorevokedpotentials