Clinical Efficacy of Hormonal and Nonhormonal Agents in the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Atrophy

OBJECTIVES: Symptomatic local treatment of vaginal atrophy (VA) in menopausal women includes hormonal and nonhormonal preparations. Some women may be reluctant to use vaginal estradiol preparations because of the concern for developing breast cancer and endometrial hyperplasia. Therefore, it is necessary to compare the therapeutic effectiveness of alternative vaginal drugs, such as promestriene, an estrogen agonist, and sodium hyaluronate (NaH), a nonhormonal, water-based agent. METHODS: Ninety-one postmenopausal women diagnosed with symptomatic VA were divided into three groups and treated for 12 weeks; 30 women with vaginal estradiol (VE), 30 women with promestriene, and 31 women with NaH. Composite scoring, vaginal maturation index (VMI), pH, frequency of sexual activity, serum hormone levels, and endometrial thickness were evaluated VA before and after treatment. RESULTS: In the comparison of VA examination findings composite scoring, VMI, and vaginal pH values, three different drugs were found to be effective in the treatment (P < 0.05). The VMI following VE treatment was significantly higher than that after NaH treatment (P = 0.031), whereas the promestriene group had a more positive change than the others in terms of increase in after treatment composite scoring and sexual activity frequency (P = 0.031, P = 0.020). There were no differences between the groups in terms of pre and after treatment serum E2 levels and endometrial thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, we can conclude that the use of promestriene or NaH can prove to be as effective and well tolerated as vaginal estradiol in the symptomatic treatment of vaginal atrophy.