Cargando…
LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol
INTRODUCTION: Best practice approaches for addressing COVID-19-related psychological distress among young people (<25 years) and their families remain unclear. Psychological first aid (PFA) is promoted by public health authorities to provide psychological support in the context of extreme events;...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33952558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049995 |
_version_ | 1783689192485683200 |
---|---|
author | Kimber, Melissa Harms, Sheila Soreni, Noam Inrig, Maggie Acai, Anita Lipman, Ellen Louise Sassi, Roberto Streiner, David L MacMillan, Harriet L |
author_facet | Kimber, Melissa Harms, Sheila Soreni, Noam Inrig, Maggie Acai, Anita Lipman, Ellen Louise Sassi, Roberto Streiner, David L MacMillan, Harriet L |
author_sort | Kimber, Melissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Best practice approaches for addressing COVID-19-related psychological distress among young people (<25 years) and their families remain unclear. Psychological first aid (PFA) is promoted by public health authorities to provide psychological support in the context of extreme events; however, there is limited evidence for its effectiveness. As a prerequisite to conducting a randomised controlled trial to examine programme effectiveness, this project is evaluating the acceptability and feasibility of implementing and evaluating a PFA training programme (‘LIVES for Families’) for mental health (MH) practitioners to improve their ability to recognise and respond to COVID-19-related psychological distress among their clients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are using a triangulation mixed methods research design; complementary strands of quantitative and qualitative data are being collected in parallel and will be merged at the interpretation phase of the project. The quantitative strand uses a repeated measures design; a consecutive sample of MH practitioners (n=80) providing MH support to young people or their families are being recruited to participate in the LIVES for Families PFA training programme and complete quantitative measures at baseline (pretraining), 2-week and 6-month follow-up time points. The qualitative strand uses fundamental description and semistructured interviews with a subset of practitioners (n=30), as well as managers of MH agencies (n=20). A mixed methods joint display and associated narrative will generate a comprehensive understanding regarding acceptability and feasibility. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board approved the study (project number: 11295). Results will be shared broadly with the policy and practice community through publications, presentations and public webinars. As a brief, evidence-informed intervention, the LIVES for Families PFA training programme is suitable in its mode of delivery across care settings. The outcomes of this study could have international implications for mitigating the MH impacts of viral pandemics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8102861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81028612021-05-10 LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol Kimber, Melissa Harms, Sheila Soreni, Noam Inrig, Maggie Acai, Anita Lipman, Ellen Louise Sassi, Roberto Streiner, David L MacMillan, Harriet L BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Best practice approaches for addressing COVID-19-related psychological distress among young people (<25 years) and their families remain unclear. Psychological first aid (PFA) is promoted by public health authorities to provide psychological support in the context of extreme events; however, there is limited evidence for its effectiveness. As a prerequisite to conducting a randomised controlled trial to examine programme effectiveness, this project is evaluating the acceptability and feasibility of implementing and evaluating a PFA training programme (‘LIVES for Families’) for mental health (MH) practitioners to improve their ability to recognise and respond to COVID-19-related psychological distress among their clients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are using a triangulation mixed methods research design; complementary strands of quantitative and qualitative data are being collected in parallel and will be merged at the interpretation phase of the project. The quantitative strand uses a repeated measures design; a consecutive sample of MH practitioners (n=80) providing MH support to young people or their families are being recruited to participate in the LIVES for Families PFA training programme and complete quantitative measures at baseline (pretraining), 2-week and 6-month follow-up time points. The qualitative strand uses fundamental description and semistructured interviews with a subset of practitioners (n=30), as well as managers of MH agencies (n=20). A mixed methods joint display and associated narrative will generate a comprehensive understanding regarding acceptability and feasibility. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board approved the study (project number: 11295). Results will be shared broadly with the policy and practice community through publications, presentations and public webinars. As a brief, evidence-informed intervention, the LIVES for Families PFA training programme is suitable in its mode of delivery across care settings. The outcomes of this study could have international implications for mitigating the MH impacts of viral pandemics. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8102861/ /pubmed/33952558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049995 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Kimber, Melissa Harms, Sheila Soreni, Noam Inrig, Maggie Acai, Anita Lipman, Ellen Louise Sassi, Roberto Streiner, David L MacMillan, Harriet L LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol |
title | LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol |
title_full | LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol |
title_fullStr | LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol |
title_short | LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol |
title_sort | lives for families psychological first aid training programme to address covid-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33952558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049995 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimbermelissa livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol AT harmssheila livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol AT soreninoam livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol AT inrigmaggie livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol AT acaianita livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol AT lipmanellenlouise livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol AT sassiroberto livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol AT streinerdavidl livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol AT macmillanharrietl livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol |