Cargando…

LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol

INTRODUCTION: Best practice approaches for addressing COVID-19-related psychological distress among young people (<25 years) and their families remain unclear. Psychological first aid (PFA) is promoted by public health authorities to provide psychological support in the context of extreme events;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kimber, Melissa, Harms, Sheila, Soreni, Noam, Inrig, Maggie, Acai, Anita, Lipman, Ellen Louise, Sassi, Roberto, Streiner, David L, MacMillan, Harriet L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33952558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049995
_version_ 1783689192485683200
author Kimber, Melissa
Harms, Sheila
Soreni, Noam
Inrig, Maggie
Acai, Anita
Lipman, Ellen Louise
Sassi, Roberto
Streiner, David L
MacMillan, Harriet L
author_facet Kimber, Melissa
Harms, Sheila
Soreni, Noam
Inrig, Maggie
Acai, Anita
Lipman, Ellen Louise
Sassi, Roberto
Streiner, David L
MacMillan, Harriet L
author_sort Kimber, Melissa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Best practice approaches for addressing COVID-19-related psychological distress among young people (<25 years) and their families remain unclear. Psychological first aid (PFA) is promoted by public health authorities to provide psychological support in the context of extreme events; however, there is limited evidence for its effectiveness. As a prerequisite to conducting a randomised controlled trial to examine programme effectiveness, this project is evaluating the acceptability and feasibility of implementing and evaluating a PFA training programme (‘LIVES for Families’) for mental health (MH) practitioners to improve their ability to recognise and respond to COVID-19-related psychological distress among their clients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are using a triangulation mixed methods research design; complementary strands of quantitative and qualitative data are being collected in parallel and will be merged at the interpretation phase of the project. The quantitative strand uses a repeated measures design; a consecutive sample of MH practitioners (n=80) providing MH support to young people or their families are being recruited to participate in the LIVES for Families PFA training programme and complete quantitative measures at baseline (pretraining), 2-week and 6-month follow-up time points. The qualitative strand uses fundamental description and semistructured interviews with a subset of practitioners (n=30), as well as managers of MH agencies (n=20). A mixed methods joint display and associated narrative will generate a comprehensive understanding regarding acceptability and feasibility. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board approved the study (project number: 11295). Results will be shared broadly with the policy and practice community through publications, presentations and public webinars. As a brief, evidence-informed intervention, the LIVES for Families PFA training programme is suitable in its mode of delivery across care settings. The outcomes of this study could have international implications for mitigating the MH impacts of viral pandemics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8102861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81028612021-05-10 LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol Kimber, Melissa Harms, Sheila Soreni, Noam Inrig, Maggie Acai, Anita Lipman, Ellen Louise Sassi, Roberto Streiner, David L MacMillan, Harriet L BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Best practice approaches for addressing COVID-19-related psychological distress among young people (<25 years) and their families remain unclear. Psychological first aid (PFA) is promoted by public health authorities to provide psychological support in the context of extreme events; however, there is limited evidence for its effectiveness. As a prerequisite to conducting a randomised controlled trial to examine programme effectiveness, this project is evaluating the acceptability and feasibility of implementing and evaluating a PFA training programme (‘LIVES for Families’) for mental health (MH) practitioners to improve their ability to recognise and respond to COVID-19-related psychological distress among their clients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are using a triangulation mixed methods research design; complementary strands of quantitative and qualitative data are being collected in parallel and will be merged at the interpretation phase of the project. The quantitative strand uses a repeated measures design; a consecutive sample of MH practitioners (n=80) providing MH support to young people or their families are being recruited to participate in the LIVES for Families PFA training programme and complete quantitative measures at baseline (pretraining), 2-week and 6-month follow-up time points. The qualitative strand uses fundamental description and semistructured interviews with a subset of practitioners (n=30), as well as managers of MH agencies (n=20). A mixed methods joint display and associated narrative will generate a comprehensive understanding regarding acceptability and feasibility. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board approved the study (project number: 11295). Results will be shared broadly with the policy and practice community through publications, presentations and public webinars. As a brief, evidence-informed intervention, the LIVES for Families PFA training programme is suitable in its mode of delivery across care settings. The outcomes of this study could have international implications for mitigating the MH impacts of viral pandemics. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8102861/ /pubmed/33952558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049995 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mental Health
Kimber, Melissa
Harms, Sheila
Soreni, Noam
Inrig, Maggie
Acai, Anita
Lipman, Ellen Louise
Sassi, Roberto
Streiner, David L
MacMillan, Harriet L
LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol
title LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol
title_full LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol
title_fullStr LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol
title_full_unstemmed LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol
title_short LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol
title_sort lives for families psychological first aid training programme to address covid-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33952558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049995
work_keys_str_mv AT kimbermelissa livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol
AT harmssheila livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol
AT soreninoam livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol
AT inrigmaggie livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol
AT acaianita livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol
AT lipmanellenlouise livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol
AT sassiroberto livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol
AT streinerdavidl livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol
AT macmillanharrietl livesforfamiliespsychologicalfirstaidtrainingprogrammetoaddresscovid19psychologicaldistressamixedmethodsacceptabilityandfeasibilityprotocol