Cargando…
Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic
OBJECTIVES: To investigate how personal protective equipment (PPE) guidance altered the facial hair of hospital doctors and explore the wider impact and implications of these changes. METHODS: A single site uncontrolled before‐after survey study examining change in facial hairstyles, and wider impli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33977160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.278 |
_version_ | 1783689245876027392 |
---|---|
author | Sahota, Sanjeev Gill, Simon Ridenton, Jennifer Hegarty, Helen Pope, Katherine Gentile, Giorgio |
author_facet | Sahota, Sanjeev Gill, Simon Ridenton, Jennifer Hegarty, Helen Pope, Katherine Gentile, Giorgio |
author_sort | Sahota, Sanjeev |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate how personal protective equipment (PPE) guidance altered the facial hair of hospital doctors and explore the wider impact and implications of these changes. METHODS: A single site uncontrolled before‐after survey study examining change in facial hairstyles, and wider implications on doctor's cultural, religious, and personal wellbeing. Outcome measures included change in facial hair between January and April 2020 and whether these changes adhered to guidance set by Public Health England. Participants were also asked about the wider impact of these changes which were thematically analyzed using an inductive approach. RESULTS: Of those who completed the survey, 257 participants met the inclusion criteria. 68% (n = 67) of doctors who could grow facial hair changed their facial hairstyle during the COVID‐19 pandemic and 96% (n = 64) reported that the change was in response to PPE guidance. The odds of having a facial hairstyle that complied with PPE guidance before the pandemic was 0.32, which rose to 2.77 after guidance was released, giving an odds ratio of 8.54 (95% CI 4.49‐16.23, P < .001). When compared to those who sported a shaven face prepandemic, the odds ratio of a change in style for those with prepandemic full beards was 37.92 (95% CI 7.45‐192.8, P < .001), for goatees was 7.22 (95% CI 1.076‐48.47, P = .04), for moustaches was 4.33 (95% CI 0.207‐90.85, P = .345), and for stubble was 9.06 (95% CI 2.133‐38.49, P = .003). Qualitative analysis revealed multiple themes, including skin irritation, loss of identity, and a significant impact on participants required to maintain a beard due to religious or cultural reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Facial hairstyles have changed significantly at our hospital during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Facial hair can impact upon doctors' cultural, religious, and personal wellbeing and these factors need to be considered with policy and provision of PPE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8103089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81030892021-05-10 Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic Sahota, Sanjeev Gill, Simon Ridenton, Jennifer Hegarty, Helen Pope, Katherine Gentile, Giorgio Health Sci Rep Research Articles OBJECTIVES: To investigate how personal protective equipment (PPE) guidance altered the facial hair of hospital doctors and explore the wider impact and implications of these changes. METHODS: A single site uncontrolled before‐after survey study examining change in facial hairstyles, and wider implications on doctor's cultural, religious, and personal wellbeing. Outcome measures included change in facial hair between January and April 2020 and whether these changes adhered to guidance set by Public Health England. Participants were also asked about the wider impact of these changes which were thematically analyzed using an inductive approach. RESULTS: Of those who completed the survey, 257 participants met the inclusion criteria. 68% (n = 67) of doctors who could grow facial hair changed their facial hairstyle during the COVID‐19 pandemic and 96% (n = 64) reported that the change was in response to PPE guidance. The odds of having a facial hairstyle that complied with PPE guidance before the pandemic was 0.32, which rose to 2.77 after guidance was released, giving an odds ratio of 8.54 (95% CI 4.49‐16.23, P < .001). When compared to those who sported a shaven face prepandemic, the odds ratio of a change in style for those with prepandemic full beards was 37.92 (95% CI 7.45‐192.8, P < .001), for goatees was 7.22 (95% CI 1.076‐48.47, P = .04), for moustaches was 4.33 (95% CI 0.207‐90.85, P = .345), and for stubble was 9.06 (95% CI 2.133‐38.49, P = .003). Qualitative analysis revealed multiple themes, including skin irritation, loss of identity, and a significant impact on participants required to maintain a beard due to religious or cultural reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Facial hairstyles have changed significantly at our hospital during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Facial hair can impact upon doctors' cultural, religious, and personal wellbeing and these factors need to be considered with policy and provision of PPE. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8103089/ /pubmed/33977160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.278 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Sahota, Sanjeev Gill, Simon Ridenton, Jennifer Hegarty, Helen Pope, Katherine Gentile, Giorgio Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title | Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_full | Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_short | Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_sort | hair today, gone tomorrow: how personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the covid‐19 pandemic |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33977160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sahotasanjeev hairtodaygonetomorrowhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentguidancechangeddoctorsfacialhairduringthecovid19pandemic AT gillsimon hairtodaygonetomorrowhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentguidancechangeddoctorsfacialhairduringthecovid19pandemic AT ridentonjennifer hairtodaygonetomorrowhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentguidancechangeddoctorsfacialhairduringthecovid19pandemic AT hegartyhelen hairtodaygonetomorrowhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentguidancechangeddoctorsfacialhairduringthecovid19pandemic AT popekatherine hairtodaygonetomorrowhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentguidancechangeddoctorsfacialhairduringthecovid19pandemic AT gentilegiorgio hairtodaygonetomorrowhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentguidancechangeddoctorsfacialhairduringthecovid19pandemic |