Cargando…

Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic

OBJECTIVES: To investigate how personal protective equipment (PPE) guidance altered the facial hair of hospital doctors and explore the wider impact and implications of these changes. METHODS: A single site uncontrolled before‐after survey study examining change in facial hairstyles, and wider impli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahota, Sanjeev, Gill, Simon, Ridenton, Jennifer, Hegarty, Helen, Pope, Katherine, Gentile, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33977160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.278
_version_ 1783689245876027392
author Sahota, Sanjeev
Gill, Simon
Ridenton, Jennifer
Hegarty, Helen
Pope, Katherine
Gentile, Giorgio
author_facet Sahota, Sanjeev
Gill, Simon
Ridenton, Jennifer
Hegarty, Helen
Pope, Katherine
Gentile, Giorgio
author_sort Sahota, Sanjeev
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate how personal protective equipment (PPE) guidance altered the facial hair of hospital doctors and explore the wider impact and implications of these changes. METHODS: A single site uncontrolled before‐after survey study examining change in facial hairstyles, and wider implications on doctor's cultural, religious, and personal wellbeing. Outcome measures included change in facial hair between January and April 2020 and whether these changes adhered to guidance set by Public Health England. Participants were also asked about the wider impact of these changes which were thematically analyzed using an inductive approach. RESULTS: Of those who completed the survey, 257 participants met the inclusion criteria. 68% (n = 67) of doctors who could grow facial hair changed their facial hairstyle during the COVID‐19 pandemic and 96% (n = 64) reported that the change was in response to PPE guidance. The odds of having a facial hairstyle that complied with PPE guidance before the pandemic was 0.32, which rose to 2.77 after guidance was released, giving an odds ratio of 8.54 (95% CI 4.49‐16.23, P < .001). When compared to those who sported a shaven face prepandemic, the odds ratio of a change in style for those with prepandemic full beards was 37.92 (95% CI 7.45‐192.8, P < .001), for goatees was 7.22 (95% CI 1.076‐48.47, P = .04), for moustaches was 4.33 (95% CI 0.207‐90.85, P = .345), and for stubble was 9.06 (95% CI 2.133‐38.49, P = .003). Qualitative analysis revealed multiple themes, including skin irritation, loss of identity, and a significant impact on participants required to maintain a beard due to religious or cultural reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Facial hairstyles have changed significantly at our hospital during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Facial hair can impact upon doctors' cultural, religious, and personal wellbeing and these factors need to be considered with policy and provision of PPE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8103089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81030892021-05-10 Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic Sahota, Sanjeev Gill, Simon Ridenton, Jennifer Hegarty, Helen Pope, Katherine Gentile, Giorgio Health Sci Rep Research Articles OBJECTIVES: To investigate how personal protective equipment (PPE) guidance altered the facial hair of hospital doctors and explore the wider impact and implications of these changes. METHODS: A single site uncontrolled before‐after survey study examining change in facial hairstyles, and wider implications on doctor's cultural, religious, and personal wellbeing. Outcome measures included change in facial hair between January and April 2020 and whether these changes adhered to guidance set by Public Health England. Participants were also asked about the wider impact of these changes which were thematically analyzed using an inductive approach. RESULTS: Of those who completed the survey, 257 participants met the inclusion criteria. 68% (n = 67) of doctors who could grow facial hair changed their facial hairstyle during the COVID‐19 pandemic and 96% (n = 64) reported that the change was in response to PPE guidance. The odds of having a facial hairstyle that complied with PPE guidance before the pandemic was 0.32, which rose to 2.77 after guidance was released, giving an odds ratio of 8.54 (95% CI 4.49‐16.23, P < .001). When compared to those who sported a shaven face prepandemic, the odds ratio of a change in style for those with prepandemic full beards was 37.92 (95% CI 7.45‐192.8, P < .001), for goatees was 7.22 (95% CI 1.076‐48.47, P = .04), for moustaches was 4.33 (95% CI 0.207‐90.85, P = .345), and for stubble was 9.06 (95% CI 2.133‐38.49, P = .003). Qualitative analysis revealed multiple themes, including skin irritation, loss of identity, and a significant impact on participants required to maintain a beard due to religious or cultural reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Facial hairstyles have changed significantly at our hospital during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Facial hair can impact upon doctors' cultural, religious, and personal wellbeing and these factors need to be considered with policy and provision of PPE. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8103089/ /pubmed/33977160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.278 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Sahota, Sanjeev
Gill, Simon
Ridenton, Jennifer
Hegarty, Helen
Pope, Katherine
Gentile, Giorgio
Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_full Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_fullStr Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_short Hair today, gone tomorrow: How personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_sort hair today, gone tomorrow: how personal protective equipment guidance changed doctor's facial hair during the covid‐19 pandemic
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33977160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.278
work_keys_str_mv AT sahotasanjeev hairtodaygonetomorrowhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentguidancechangeddoctorsfacialhairduringthecovid19pandemic
AT gillsimon hairtodaygonetomorrowhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentguidancechangeddoctorsfacialhairduringthecovid19pandemic
AT ridentonjennifer hairtodaygonetomorrowhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentguidancechangeddoctorsfacialhairduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hegartyhelen hairtodaygonetomorrowhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentguidancechangeddoctorsfacialhairduringthecovid19pandemic
AT popekatherine hairtodaygonetomorrowhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentguidancechangeddoctorsfacialhairduringthecovid19pandemic
AT gentilegiorgio hairtodaygonetomorrowhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentguidancechangeddoctorsfacialhairduringthecovid19pandemic