Cargando…
A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer
The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic and conventional techniques following Total Pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (TPLE) with respect to perioperative morbidity and mortality and postoperative recovery in post cricoid cancer patients. This is a prospective study, which was undertaken in Gu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805248 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clinpract11020025 |
_version_ | 1783689284269637632 |
---|---|
author | Prakash, Basavegowda Vinod Anwar, Ali Zaid Abhishek, Mahadev Sharma, Shivaji Shruthi, Saseendran |
author_facet | Prakash, Basavegowda Vinod Anwar, Ali Zaid Abhishek, Mahadev Sharma, Shivaji Shruthi, Saseendran |
author_sort | Prakash, Basavegowda Vinod |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic and conventional techniques following Total Pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (TPLE) with respect to perioperative morbidity and mortality and postoperative recovery in post cricoid cancer patients. This is a prospective study, which was undertaken in Gujrat Cancer Research Institute (GCRI) in the period of July 2007 to March 2010. Fifteen consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic TPLE were compared to that of 18 consecutive patients who underwent open TPLE. Laparoscopic and open TPLE procedure were compared with respect to patient characteristics, intra operative and complications present. The average duration was observed to be 3.5 h in the MIS (Minimally Invasive Group) group and was 5.3 h in the open group. The average blood loss was 300 mL in the MIS group and 500 mL in the open group. Average duration of the hospital stay in the MIS group was 13 days and 16 days in the open group. In the MIS group, one patient (6.7%) had a pneumonic complication and two patients (13%) had wound complications. In the open group, six patients (33%) had pneumonic consolidation and four patients (22%) had wound infections. In both groups, one patient each suffered mortality. Laparoscopic TPLE has been found to be much safer with less morbidity as compared with open surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8103263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81032632021-05-08 A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer Prakash, Basavegowda Vinod Anwar, Ali Zaid Abhishek, Mahadev Sharma, Shivaji Shruthi, Saseendran Clin Pract Brief Report The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic and conventional techniques following Total Pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (TPLE) with respect to perioperative morbidity and mortality and postoperative recovery in post cricoid cancer patients. This is a prospective study, which was undertaken in Gujrat Cancer Research Institute (GCRI) in the period of July 2007 to March 2010. Fifteen consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic TPLE were compared to that of 18 consecutive patients who underwent open TPLE. Laparoscopic and open TPLE procedure were compared with respect to patient characteristics, intra operative and complications present. The average duration was observed to be 3.5 h in the MIS (Minimally Invasive Group) group and was 5.3 h in the open group. The average blood loss was 300 mL in the MIS group and 500 mL in the open group. Average duration of the hospital stay in the MIS group was 13 days and 16 days in the open group. In the MIS group, one patient (6.7%) had a pneumonic complication and two patients (13%) had wound complications. In the open group, six patients (33%) had pneumonic consolidation and four patients (22%) had wound infections. In both groups, one patient each suffered mortality. Laparoscopic TPLE has been found to be much safer with less morbidity as compared with open surgery. MDPI 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8103263/ /pubmed/33805248 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clinpract11020025 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Prakash, Basavegowda Vinod Anwar, Ali Zaid Abhishek, Mahadev Sharma, Shivaji Shruthi, Saseendran A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer |
title | A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer |
title_full | A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer |
title_fullStr | A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer |
title_short | A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer |
title_sort | prospective study comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional stomach pull up in total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy for post cricoid cancer |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805248 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clinpract11020025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prakashbasavegowdavinod aprospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer AT anwaralizaid aprospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer AT abhishekmahadev aprospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer AT sharmashivaji aprospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer AT shruthisaseendran aprospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer AT prakashbasavegowdavinod prospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer AT anwaralizaid prospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer AT abhishekmahadev prospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer AT sharmashivaji prospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer AT shruthisaseendran prospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer |