Cargando…

A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer

The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic and conventional techniques following Total Pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (TPLE) with respect to perioperative morbidity and mortality and postoperative recovery in post cricoid cancer patients. This is a prospective study, which was undertaken in Gu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prakash, Basavegowda Vinod, Anwar, Ali Zaid, Abhishek, Mahadev, Sharma, Shivaji, Shruthi, Saseendran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805248
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clinpract11020025
_version_ 1783689284269637632
author Prakash, Basavegowda Vinod
Anwar, Ali Zaid
Abhishek, Mahadev
Sharma, Shivaji
Shruthi, Saseendran
author_facet Prakash, Basavegowda Vinod
Anwar, Ali Zaid
Abhishek, Mahadev
Sharma, Shivaji
Shruthi, Saseendran
author_sort Prakash, Basavegowda Vinod
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic and conventional techniques following Total Pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (TPLE) with respect to perioperative morbidity and mortality and postoperative recovery in post cricoid cancer patients. This is a prospective study, which was undertaken in Gujrat Cancer Research Institute (GCRI) in the period of July 2007 to March 2010. Fifteen consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic TPLE were compared to that of 18 consecutive patients who underwent open TPLE. Laparoscopic and open TPLE procedure were compared with respect to patient characteristics, intra operative and complications present. The average duration was observed to be 3.5 h in the MIS (Minimally Invasive Group) group and was 5.3 h in the open group. The average blood loss was 300 mL in the MIS group and 500 mL in the open group. Average duration of the hospital stay in the MIS group was 13 days and 16 days in the open group. In the MIS group, one patient (6.7%) had a pneumonic complication and two patients (13%) had wound complications. In the open group, six patients (33%) had pneumonic consolidation and four patients (22%) had wound infections. In both groups, one patient each suffered mortality. Laparoscopic TPLE has been found to be much safer with less morbidity as compared with open surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8103263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81032632021-05-08 A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer Prakash, Basavegowda Vinod Anwar, Ali Zaid Abhishek, Mahadev Sharma, Shivaji Shruthi, Saseendran Clin Pract Brief Report The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic and conventional techniques following Total Pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (TPLE) with respect to perioperative morbidity and mortality and postoperative recovery in post cricoid cancer patients. This is a prospective study, which was undertaken in Gujrat Cancer Research Institute (GCRI) in the period of July 2007 to March 2010. Fifteen consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic TPLE were compared to that of 18 consecutive patients who underwent open TPLE. Laparoscopic and open TPLE procedure were compared with respect to patient characteristics, intra operative and complications present. The average duration was observed to be 3.5 h in the MIS (Minimally Invasive Group) group and was 5.3 h in the open group. The average blood loss was 300 mL in the MIS group and 500 mL in the open group. Average duration of the hospital stay in the MIS group was 13 days and 16 days in the open group. In the MIS group, one patient (6.7%) had a pneumonic complication and two patients (13%) had wound complications. In the open group, six patients (33%) had pneumonic consolidation and four patients (22%) had wound infections. In both groups, one patient each suffered mortality. Laparoscopic TPLE has been found to be much safer with less morbidity as compared with open surgery. MDPI 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8103263/ /pubmed/33805248 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clinpract11020025 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Prakash, Basavegowda Vinod
Anwar, Ali Zaid
Abhishek, Mahadev
Sharma, Shivaji
Shruthi, Saseendran
A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer
title A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer
title_full A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer
title_fullStr A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer
title_short A Prospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Stomach Pull Up in Total Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Post Cricoid Cancer
title_sort prospective study comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional stomach pull up in total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy for post cricoid cancer
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805248
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clinpract11020025
work_keys_str_mv AT prakashbasavegowdavinod aprospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer
AT anwaralizaid aprospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer
AT abhishekmahadev aprospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer
AT sharmashivaji aprospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer
AT shruthisaseendran aprospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer
AT prakashbasavegowdavinod prospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer
AT anwaralizaid prospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer
AT abhishekmahadev prospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer
AT sharmashivaji prospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer
AT shruthisaseendran prospectivestudycomparinglaparoscopicvsconventionalstomachpullupintotalpharyngolaryngoesophagectomyforpostcricoidcancer