Cargando…

Scoping review of cochlear implantation in Susac’s syndrome

OBJECTIVE: Scoping review of published literature to establish clinical characteristics and audiologic outcomes in patients diagnosed with Susac’s Syndrome(SS) who have undergone cochlear implantation (CI). DATA SOURCES: All published studies of CI in SS and contribution of two of our own patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez, Philip L., McCall, Andrew A., Hirsch, Barry E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: KeAi Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.10.004
_version_ 1783689324505595904
author Pérez, Philip L.
McCall, Andrew A.
Hirsch, Barry E.
author_facet Pérez, Philip L.
McCall, Andrew A.
Hirsch, Barry E.
author_sort Pérez, Philip L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Scoping review of published literature to establish clinical characteristics and audiologic outcomes in patients diagnosed with Susac’s Syndrome(SS) who have undergone cochlear implantation (CI). DATA SOURCES: All published studies of CI in SS and contribution of two of our own patients who have not been reported previously. METHODS: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE (via PubMed) was carried out in March 2020 using the following keywords and related entry terms: Susac’s Syndrome, Cochlear Implantation. RESULTS: Our search identified a total of five case reports of CI in SS. With the addition of our two patients reported here, we analyzed characteristics and outcomes in seven patients. Mean age at implantation was 30 years old (range 19–46), with six women and one man implanted. Mean time from onset of hearing loss to implantation was 17 months (range three months to four years). Best reported postoperative speech understanding was reported via different metrics, with six of seven patients achieving open set speech scores of 90% or better, and one subject performing at 68%. Vestibular symptoms were present preoperatively in four of seven patients (57%), with vestibular testing reported in two patients, and showing vestibulopathy in one patient. No complications were reported following cochlear implantation. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation is a viable option for hearing rehabilitation in patients with SS, with levels of attainment of open set speech comparable to other populations of CI candidates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8103525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher KeAi Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81035252021-05-13 Scoping review of cochlear implantation in Susac’s syndrome Pérez, Philip L. McCall, Andrew A. Hirsch, Barry E. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg Review Article OBJECTIVE: Scoping review of published literature to establish clinical characteristics and audiologic outcomes in patients diagnosed with Susac’s Syndrome(SS) who have undergone cochlear implantation (CI). DATA SOURCES: All published studies of CI in SS and contribution of two of our own patients who have not been reported previously. METHODS: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE (via PubMed) was carried out in March 2020 using the following keywords and related entry terms: Susac’s Syndrome, Cochlear Implantation. RESULTS: Our search identified a total of five case reports of CI in SS. With the addition of our two patients reported here, we analyzed characteristics and outcomes in seven patients. Mean age at implantation was 30 years old (range 19–46), with six women and one man implanted. Mean time from onset of hearing loss to implantation was 17 months (range three months to four years). Best reported postoperative speech understanding was reported via different metrics, with six of seven patients achieving open set speech scores of 90% or better, and one subject performing at 68%. Vestibular symptoms were present preoperatively in four of seven patients (57%), with vestibular testing reported in two patients, and showing vestibulopathy in one patient. No complications were reported following cochlear implantation. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation is a viable option for hearing rehabilitation in patients with SS, with levels of attainment of open set speech comparable to other populations of CI candidates. KeAi Publishing 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8103525/ /pubmed/33997722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.10.004 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Pérez, Philip L.
McCall, Andrew A.
Hirsch, Barry E.
Scoping review of cochlear implantation in Susac’s syndrome
title Scoping review of cochlear implantation in Susac’s syndrome
title_full Scoping review of cochlear implantation in Susac’s syndrome
title_fullStr Scoping review of cochlear implantation in Susac’s syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Scoping review of cochlear implantation in Susac’s syndrome
title_short Scoping review of cochlear implantation in Susac’s syndrome
title_sort scoping review of cochlear implantation in susac’s syndrome
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.10.004
work_keys_str_mv AT perezphilipl scopingreviewofcochlearimplantationinsusacssyndrome
AT mccallandrewa scopingreviewofcochlearimplantationinsusacssyndrome
AT hirschbarrye scopingreviewofcochlearimplantationinsusacssyndrome