Cargando…

Mechanisms of sterile inflammation after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs: a narrative review

BACKGROUND: Intraocular inflammation is an uncommon but potentially vision-threatening adverse event related to anti-VEGF therapy. This is of increasing importance given both the volume of injections performed, as well as the increased prevalence of inflammation seen with newer anti-VEGF agents. Bro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, William J., da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos, Lima, Luiz Henrique, Emerson, Geoffrey G., Rodrigues, Eduardo Büchele, Melo, Gustavo Barreto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33962696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-021-00307-7
_version_ 1783689336607211520
author Anderson, William J.
da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos
Lima, Luiz Henrique
Emerson, Geoffrey G.
Rodrigues, Eduardo Büchele
Melo, Gustavo Barreto
author_facet Anderson, William J.
da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos
Lima, Luiz Henrique
Emerson, Geoffrey G.
Rodrigues, Eduardo Büchele
Melo, Gustavo Barreto
author_sort Anderson, William J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intraocular inflammation is an uncommon but potentially vision-threatening adverse event related to anti-VEGF therapy. This is of increasing importance given both the volume of injections performed, as well as the increased prevalence of inflammation seen with newer anti-VEGF agents. Brolucizumab, the newest anti-VEGF agent, has been associated with an inflammatory retinal vasculitis and the underlying mechanism is unclear. Reviewing potential mechanisms and clinical differences of intraocular inflammation may assist clinicians and scientists in reducing the risk of these events in the future. OBSERVATIONS: Two types of inflammation are seen with intravitreal injections, acute onset sterile inflammation and delayed onset inflammatory vasculitis. Acute onset inflammation can be subcategorized into subclinical anterior chamber inflammation and sterile uveitis/endophthalmitis. Subclinical anterior chamber inflammation can occur at rates as high as 19% after intravitreal anti-VEGF injection. Rates of sterile uveitis/endophthalmitis range from 0.05% to 4.4% depending on the anti-VEGF agent. Inflammatory vasculitis is only associated with brolucizumab and occurred in 3.3% of injections according to the post hoc review of the HAWK/HARRIER data. In addition, silicone oil from syringes can induce immunogenic protein aggregates. Agitation of the syringe, freeze thawing, shipping and improper storage prior to injection may increase the amount of silicone oil released from the syringe. CONCLUSION: The main factors which play a role in intraocular inflammation after anti-VEGF injection can be divided into three causes: patient-specific, medication-specific and delivery-specific. The majority of clinically significant inflammation seen after intravitreal injection is an acute onset inflammatory response with most patients recovering baseline VA in 3–5 weeks. The presence of pain, hypopyon, severe anterior chamber reaction, hyperemia and significant vision loss may help distinguish infectious from non-infectious etiologies of post injection inflammation. Avoiding temperature fluctuation, mechanical shock, agitation during transport and handling of syringes/drugs, and the use of SO-free syringes may help minimize intraocular inflammation. While a definitive mechanism has not yet been established, current knowledge of the clinical presentation and vitreous histopathology of brolucizumab-retinal vasculitis favors an auto-immune type IV hypersensitivity reaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8103589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81035892021-05-10 Mechanisms of sterile inflammation after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs: a narrative review Anderson, William J. da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos Lima, Luiz Henrique Emerson, Geoffrey G. Rodrigues, Eduardo Büchele Melo, Gustavo Barreto Int J Retina Vitreous Review BACKGROUND: Intraocular inflammation is an uncommon but potentially vision-threatening adverse event related to anti-VEGF therapy. This is of increasing importance given both the volume of injections performed, as well as the increased prevalence of inflammation seen with newer anti-VEGF agents. Brolucizumab, the newest anti-VEGF agent, has been associated with an inflammatory retinal vasculitis and the underlying mechanism is unclear. Reviewing potential mechanisms and clinical differences of intraocular inflammation may assist clinicians and scientists in reducing the risk of these events in the future. OBSERVATIONS: Two types of inflammation are seen with intravitreal injections, acute onset sterile inflammation and delayed onset inflammatory vasculitis. Acute onset inflammation can be subcategorized into subclinical anterior chamber inflammation and sterile uveitis/endophthalmitis. Subclinical anterior chamber inflammation can occur at rates as high as 19% after intravitreal anti-VEGF injection. Rates of sterile uveitis/endophthalmitis range from 0.05% to 4.4% depending on the anti-VEGF agent. Inflammatory vasculitis is only associated with brolucizumab and occurred in 3.3% of injections according to the post hoc review of the HAWK/HARRIER data. In addition, silicone oil from syringes can induce immunogenic protein aggregates. Agitation of the syringe, freeze thawing, shipping and improper storage prior to injection may increase the amount of silicone oil released from the syringe. CONCLUSION: The main factors which play a role in intraocular inflammation after anti-VEGF injection can be divided into three causes: patient-specific, medication-specific and delivery-specific. The majority of clinically significant inflammation seen after intravitreal injection is an acute onset inflammatory response with most patients recovering baseline VA in 3–5 weeks. The presence of pain, hypopyon, severe anterior chamber reaction, hyperemia and significant vision loss may help distinguish infectious from non-infectious etiologies of post injection inflammation. Avoiding temperature fluctuation, mechanical shock, agitation during transport and handling of syringes/drugs, and the use of SO-free syringes may help minimize intraocular inflammation. While a definitive mechanism has not yet been established, current knowledge of the clinical presentation and vitreous histopathology of brolucizumab-retinal vasculitis favors an auto-immune type IV hypersensitivity reaction. BioMed Central 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8103589/ /pubmed/33962696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-021-00307-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Anderson, William J.
da Cruz, Natasha Ferreira Santos
Lima, Luiz Henrique
Emerson, Geoffrey G.
Rodrigues, Eduardo Büchele
Melo, Gustavo Barreto
Mechanisms of sterile inflammation after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs: a narrative review
title Mechanisms of sterile inflammation after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs: a narrative review
title_full Mechanisms of sterile inflammation after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs: a narrative review
title_fullStr Mechanisms of sterile inflammation after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Mechanisms of sterile inflammation after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs: a narrative review
title_short Mechanisms of sterile inflammation after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs: a narrative review
title_sort mechanisms of sterile inflammation after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs: a narrative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33962696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-021-00307-7
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonwilliamj mechanismsofsterileinflammationafterintravitrealinjectionofantiangiogenicdrugsanarrativereview
AT dacruznatashaferreirasantos mechanismsofsterileinflammationafterintravitrealinjectionofantiangiogenicdrugsanarrativereview
AT limaluizhenrique mechanismsofsterileinflammationafterintravitrealinjectionofantiangiogenicdrugsanarrativereview
AT emersongeoffreyg mechanismsofsterileinflammationafterintravitrealinjectionofantiangiogenicdrugsanarrativereview
AT rodrigueseduardobuchele mechanismsofsterileinflammationafterintravitrealinjectionofantiangiogenicdrugsanarrativereview
AT melogustavobarreto mechanismsofsterileinflammationafterintravitrealinjectionofantiangiogenicdrugsanarrativereview