Cargando…

Comparison of Subgenomic and Total RNA in SARS-CoV-2-Challenged Rhesus Macaques

Respiratory virus challenge studies involve administration of the challenge virus and sampling to assess for protection in the same anatomical locations. It can therefore be difficult to differentiate actively replicating virus from input challenge virus. For SARS-CoV-2, specific monitoring of activ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dagotto, Gabriel, Mercado, Noe B., Martinez, David R., Hou, Yixuan J., Nkolola, Joseph P., Carnahan, Robert H., Crowe, James E., Baric, Ralph S., Barouch, Dan H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02370-20
Descripción
Sumario:Respiratory virus challenge studies involve administration of the challenge virus and sampling to assess for protection in the same anatomical locations. It can therefore be difficult to differentiate actively replicating virus from input challenge virus. For SARS-CoV-2, specific monitoring of actively replicating virus is critical for investigating the protective and therapeutic efficacy of vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and antiviral drugs. We adapted a SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) RT-PCR assay to differentiate productive infection from inactivated or neutralized virus. Subgenomic RNAs are generated after cell entry and are poorly incorporated into mature virions, and thus may provide a marker for actively replicating virus. We show envelope (E) sgRNA was degraded by RNase in infected cell lysates, while genomic RNA (gRNA) was protected, presumably due to packaging into virions. To investigate the capacity of the sgRNA assay to distinguish input challenge virus from actively replicating virus in vivo, we compared the E sgRNA assay to a standard nucleoprotein (N) or E total (both gRNA and sgRNA) RNA in convalescent rhesus macaques and in antibody-treated rhesus macaques after experimental SARS-CoV-2 challenge. In both studies, the E sgRNA assay was negative, suggesting protective efficacy, whereas the N and E total RNA assays remained positive. These data suggest the potential utility of sgRNA to monitor actively replicating virus in prophylactic and therapeutic SARS-CoV-2 studies. IMPORTANCE Developing therapeutic and prophylactic countermeasures for the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a public health priority. During challenge studies, respiratory viruses are delivered and sampled from the same anatomical location. It is therefore important to distinguish actively replicating virus from input challenge virus. The most common assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 virus, reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) targeting nucleocapsid total RNA, cannot distinguish neutralized input virus from replicating virus. In this study, we assess SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RNA as a potential measure of replicating virus in rhesus macaques.