Cargando…
Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to (1) identify Graduate Public Health (GPH) programmes with an integrated practicum, (2) determine current practice for practicum design and (3) use the information to make recommendations to inform the design of Public Health Graduate programme practicu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33958343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047512 |
_version_ | 1783689390241873920 |
---|---|
author | Gummeson, Hannah Raj Goel, Sonika Elmusharaf, Khalifa |
author_facet | Gummeson, Hannah Raj Goel, Sonika Elmusharaf, Khalifa |
author_sort | Gummeson, Hannah |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to (1) identify Graduate Public Health (GPH) programmes with an integrated practicum, (2) determine current practice for practicum design and (3) use the information to make recommendations to inform the design of Public Health Graduate programme practicums. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Academic Ranking World Universities 2019 was used to identify top 10 institutions in each geographical hub offering GPH programmes. Each GPH programme website was searched for practicum information. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: GPH programmes offering a practice-based component as a requirement in their curriculum. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: One reviewer screened GPH websites for eligibility and extracted data. Verification of data for accuracy and completeness was done on 10% of the sample by the second author. Data were compiled into an Excel file and were analysed to describe the duration, timing, credit, contact hours, preceptor requirements, prerequisites, objectives, deliverables and methods of evaluation of the practice-based component. RESULTS: Out of the 108 GPH programmes screened, a total of 35 programmes were included. There was a significant variation in required practicum duration ranging from 4 to 16 weeks. Only 31% specifically outlined prerequisites to be completed before the initiation of the practicum. More than half (57%) had a published list of core competencies. A majority of practicum did not provide criteria for appropriate preceptors (63%) and their responsibilities (66%). All programmes listed assessment criteria however the majority (57%) did not specify if the practicum was graded or a for-credit component. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of practical components into curricula is inconsistent. This research resulted in 14 recommendations intended to guide GPH practicum design. We propose that this study be used as a tool to spark a global dialogue about best practices in GPH education through the identification of common practices and opportunities for improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8103934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81039342021-05-24 Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education Gummeson, Hannah Raj Goel, Sonika Elmusharaf, Khalifa BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to (1) identify Graduate Public Health (GPH) programmes with an integrated practicum, (2) determine current practice for practicum design and (3) use the information to make recommendations to inform the design of Public Health Graduate programme practicums. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Academic Ranking World Universities 2019 was used to identify top 10 institutions in each geographical hub offering GPH programmes. Each GPH programme website was searched for practicum information. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: GPH programmes offering a practice-based component as a requirement in their curriculum. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: One reviewer screened GPH websites for eligibility and extracted data. Verification of data for accuracy and completeness was done on 10% of the sample by the second author. Data were compiled into an Excel file and were analysed to describe the duration, timing, credit, contact hours, preceptor requirements, prerequisites, objectives, deliverables and methods of evaluation of the practice-based component. RESULTS: Out of the 108 GPH programmes screened, a total of 35 programmes were included. There was a significant variation in required practicum duration ranging from 4 to 16 weeks. Only 31% specifically outlined prerequisites to be completed before the initiation of the practicum. More than half (57%) had a published list of core competencies. A majority of practicum did not provide criteria for appropriate preceptors (63%) and their responsibilities (66%). All programmes listed assessment criteria however the majority (57%) did not specify if the practicum was graded or a for-credit component. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of practical components into curricula is inconsistent. This research resulted in 14 recommendations intended to guide GPH practicum design. We propose that this study be used as a tool to spark a global dialogue about best practices in GPH education through the identification of common practices and opportunities for improvement. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8103934/ /pubmed/33958343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047512 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Public Health Gummeson, Hannah Raj Goel, Sonika Elmusharaf, Khalifa Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education |
title | Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education |
title_full | Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education |
title_fullStr | Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education |
title_full_unstemmed | Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education |
title_short | Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education |
title_sort | public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33958343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047512 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gummesonhannah publichealthpracticumascopingreviewofcurrentpracticeingraduatepublichealtheducation AT rajgoelsonika publichealthpracticumascopingreviewofcurrentpracticeingraduatepublichealtheducation AT elmusharafkhalifa publichealthpracticumascopingreviewofcurrentpracticeingraduatepublichealtheducation |