Cargando…

Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to (1) identify Graduate Public Health (GPH) programmes with an integrated practicum, (2) determine current practice for practicum design and (3) use the information to make recommendations to inform the design of Public Health Graduate programme practicu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gummeson, Hannah, Raj Goel, Sonika, Elmusharaf, Khalifa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33958343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047512
_version_ 1783689390241873920
author Gummeson, Hannah
Raj Goel, Sonika
Elmusharaf, Khalifa
author_facet Gummeson, Hannah
Raj Goel, Sonika
Elmusharaf, Khalifa
author_sort Gummeson, Hannah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to (1) identify Graduate Public Health (GPH) programmes with an integrated practicum, (2) determine current practice for practicum design and (3) use the information to make recommendations to inform the design of Public Health Graduate programme practicums. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Academic Ranking World Universities 2019 was used to identify top 10 institutions in each geographical hub offering GPH programmes. Each GPH programme website was searched for practicum information. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: GPH programmes offering a practice-based component as a requirement in their curriculum. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: One reviewer screened GPH websites for eligibility and extracted data. Verification of data for accuracy and completeness was done on 10% of the sample by the second author. Data were compiled into an Excel file and were analysed to describe the duration, timing, credit, contact hours, preceptor requirements, prerequisites, objectives, deliverables and methods of evaluation of the practice-based component. RESULTS: Out of the 108 GPH programmes screened, a total of 35 programmes were included. There was a significant variation in required practicum duration ranging from 4 to 16 weeks. Only 31% specifically outlined prerequisites to be completed before the initiation of the practicum. More than half (57%) had a published list of core competencies. A majority of practicum did not provide criteria for appropriate preceptors (63%) and their responsibilities (66%). All programmes listed assessment criteria however the majority (57%) did not specify if the practicum was graded or a for-credit component. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of practical components into curricula is inconsistent. This research resulted in 14 recommendations intended to guide GPH practicum design. We propose that this study be used as a tool to spark a global dialogue about best practices in GPH education through the identification of common practices and opportunities for improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8103934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81039342021-05-24 Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education Gummeson, Hannah Raj Goel, Sonika Elmusharaf, Khalifa BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to (1) identify Graduate Public Health (GPH) programmes with an integrated practicum, (2) determine current practice for practicum design and (3) use the information to make recommendations to inform the design of Public Health Graduate programme practicums. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Academic Ranking World Universities 2019 was used to identify top 10 institutions in each geographical hub offering GPH programmes. Each GPH programme website was searched for practicum information. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: GPH programmes offering a practice-based component as a requirement in their curriculum. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: One reviewer screened GPH websites for eligibility and extracted data. Verification of data for accuracy and completeness was done on 10% of the sample by the second author. Data were compiled into an Excel file and were analysed to describe the duration, timing, credit, contact hours, preceptor requirements, prerequisites, objectives, deliverables and methods of evaluation of the practice-based component. RESULTS: Out of the 108 GPH programmes screened, a total of 35 programmes were included. There was a significant variation in required practicum duration ranging from 4 to 16 weeks. Only 31% specifically outlined prerequisites to be completed before the initiation of the practicum. More than half (57%) had a published list of core competencies. A majority of practicum did not provide criteria for appropriate preceptors (63%) and their responsibilities (66%). All programmes listed assessment criteria however the majority (57%) did not specify if the practicum was graded or a for-credit component. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of practical components into curricula is inconsistent. This research resulted in 14 recommendations intended to guide GPH practicum design. We propose that this study be used as a tool to spark a global dialogue about best practices in GPH education through the identification of common practices and opportunities for improvement. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8103934/ /pubmed/33958343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047512 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Gummeson, Hannah
Raj Goel, Sonika
Elmusharaf, Khalifa
Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education
title Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education
title_full Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education
title_fullStr Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education
title_full_unstemmed Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education
title_short Public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education
title_sort public health practicum: a scoping review of current practice in graduate public health education
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33958343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047512
work_keys_str_mv AT gummesonhannah publichealthpracticumascopingreviewofcurrentpracticeingraduatepublichealtheducation
AT rajgoelsonika publichealthpracticumascopingreviewofcurrentpracticeingraduatepublichealtheducation
AT elmusharafkhalifa publichealthpracticumascopingreviewofcurrentpracticeingraduatepublichealtheducation