The diagnostic reliability and validity of noninvasive imaging modalities to assess leptomeningeal collateral flow for ischemic stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Leptomeningeal collateral flow (LMF) is associated with infarct area and clinical outcome for ischemic stroke patients. Although LMF can be detected by multiple imaging methods, but their diagnostic performance is uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic validity or reliability of noninvasive image methods in assessing LMF. Databases included PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Original observational cohort studies. Ischemic stroke patients. Different noninvasive image methods to assess LMF. Newcastle–Ottawa Scale to evaluate the quality of the studies; forest plot to show pooled results; I(2) and Egger test to evaluate the heterogeneity and publication bias. Thirty of the 126 selected studies were eligible. For CT angiography, the interobserver agreement ranged from 0.494 to 0.93 and weighted kappa was 0.888; for patients receiving thrombolysis or endovascular treatment, 0.68 to 0.91; 0.494 to 0.89 for the 2-point system, 0.60 to 0.93 for the 3-point system, 0.68 to 0.87 for the system of >4 points; area under the curve (AUC) was 0.78. For perfusion computed tomography (CTP), the interobserver agreement ranged from 0.724 to 0.872; for patients receiving thrombolysis or endovascular treatment, 0.74 to 0.872; 0.724 for the 2-point system, 0.783 to 0.953 for the 3-point system; the intraobserver agreement was 0.884; AUC was 0.826. For MRI-fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), the interobserver agreement ranged from 0.58 to 0.86; for patients receiving thrombolysis or endovascular treatment, 0.75 to 0.86; 0.86 for the two-point system, 0.77 to 0.87 for the system of more than 5 points; AUC was 0.82. No pooled data of CTP and FLAIR. The difference cohort study had difference bias. The unpublished data were not included. CT angiography is a good tool for assessing LMF. CTP shows a good validity and reliability, but its diagnostic value needs more evidence. FLAIR is a good modality to assess LMF. These image methods had better validity and reliability to evaluate LMF of patients receiving thrombolysis or endovascular treatment than all ischemic stroke patients.