Cargando…

Comparisons between Locomat and Walkbot robotic gait training regarding balance and lower extremity function among non-ambulatory chronic acquired brain injury survivors

Lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robots connect with the human body in a wearable way and control the movement of joints in the gait rehabilitation process. Among treadmill-based lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robots, Lokomat (Hocoma AG, Volketswil, Switzerland) has 4 actuated joints for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hoo Young, Park, Jung Hyun, Kim, Tae-Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8104242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33950915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025125
_version_ 1783689453036896256
author Lee, Hoo Young
Park, Jung Hyun
Kim, Tae-Woo
author_facet Lee, Hoo Young
Park, Jung Hyun
Kim, Tae-Woo
author_sort Lee, Hoo Young
collection PubMed
description Lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robots connect with the human body in a wearable way and control the movement of joints in the gait rehabilitation process. Among treadmill-based lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robots, Lokomat (Hocoma AG, Volketswil, Switzerland) has 4 actuated joints for bilateral hips and knees whereas Walkbot (P&S Mechanics, Seoul, Korea) has 6 bilateral actuated joints for bilateral hips, knees, and ankles. Lokomat and Walkbot robotic gait training systems have not been directly compared previously. The present study aimed to directly compare Lokomat and Walkbot robots in non-ambulatory chronic patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). The authors conducted a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study of 62 subjects with ABI who were admitted to the rehabilitation hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Lokomat (n = 28) and Walkbot (n = 34). Patients were subjected to robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) combined with conventional physical therapy for a total of 14 (8–36) median (interquartile range) sessions. Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, lag time post-injury, ABI type, paralysis type, intervention sessions, lower extremity strength, spasticity, and cognitive function were assessed. Functional ambulation category (FAC) and Berg balance scale (BBS) were used for outcome measures. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. Baseline FAC score was 1 (0–2) in Lokomat and 1 (0–1) in Walkbot group. After the intervention, FAC scores improved significantly to 2 (1–3) in both groups (P < .05). Lokomat and Walkbot groups showed significantly enhanced BBS from 5 (2.75–24.25) and 15 (4–26.5) to 15 (4–26.5) and 22 (12–40), respectively (P < .05). Degree of improvements in both group were not significantly different with regard to balance (P = .56) and ambulatory ability (P = .74). This study indicates that both Locomat and Walkbot robotic gait training combined with conventional gait-oriented physiotherapy are promising intervention for gait rehabilitation in patients with chronic stage of ABI who are not able to walk independently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8104242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81042422021-05-10 Comparisons between Locomat and Walkbot robotic gait training regarding balance and lower extremity function among non-ambulatory chronic acquired brain injury survivors Lee, Hoo Young Park, Jung Hyun Kim, Tae-Woo Medicine (Baltimore) 6300 Lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robots connect with the human body in a wearable way and control the movement of joints in the gait rehabilitation process. Among treadmill-based lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robots, Lokomat (Hocoma AG, Volketswil, Switzerland) has 4 actuated joints for bilateral hips and knees whereas Walkbot (P&S Mechanics, Seoul, Korea) has 6 bilateral actuated joints for bilateral hips, knees, and ankles. Lokomat and Walkbot robotic gait training systems have not been directly compared previously. The present study aimed to directly compare Lokomat and Walkbot robots in non-ambulatory chronic patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). The authors conducted a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study of 62 subjects with ABI who were admitted to the rehabilitation hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Lokomat (n = 28) and Walkbot (n = 34). Patients were subjected to robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) combined with conventional physical therapy for a total of 14 (8–36) median (interquartile range) sessions. Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, lag time post-injury, ABI type, paralysis type, intervention sessions, lower extremity strength, spasticity, and cognitive function were assessed. Functional ambulation category (FAC) and Berg balance scale (BBS) were used for outcome measures. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. Baseline FAC score was 1 (0–2) in Lokomat and 1 (0–1) in Walkbot group. After the intervention, FAC scores improved significantly to 2 (1–3) in both groups (P < .05). Lokomat and Walkbot groups showed significantly enhanced BBS from 5 (2.75–24.25) and 15 (4–26.5) to 15 (4–26.5) and 22 (12–40), respectively (P < .05). Degree of improvements in both group were not significantly different with regard to balance (P = .56) and ambulatory ability (P = .74). This study indicates that both Locomat and Walkbot robotic gait training combined with conventional gait-oriented physiotherapy are promising intervention for gait rehabilitation in patients with chronic stage of ABI who are not able to walk independently. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8104242/ /pubmed/33950915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025125 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 6300
Lee, Hoo Young
Park, Jung Hyun
Kim, Tae-Woo
Comparisons between Locomat and Walkbot robotic gait training regarding balance and lower extremity function among non-ambulatory chronic acquired brain injury survivors
title Comparisons between Locomat and Walkbot robotic gait training regarding balance and lower extremity function among non-ambulatory chronic acquired brain injury survivors
title_full Comparisons between Locomat and Walkbot robotic gait training regarding balance and lower extremity function among non-ambulatory chronic acquired brain injury survivors
title_fullStr Comparisons between Locomat and Walkbot robotic gait training regarding balance and lower extremity function among non-ambulatory chronic acquired brain injury survivors
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons between Locomat and Walkbot robotic gait training regarding balance and lower extremity function among non-ambulatory chronic acquired brain injury survivors
title_short Comparisons between Locomat and Walkbot robotic gait training regarding balance and lower extremity function among non-ambulatory chronic acquired brain injury survivors
title_sort comparisons between locomat and walkbot robotic gait training regarding balance and lower extremity function among non-ambulatory chronic acquired brain injury survivors
topic 6300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8104242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33950915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025125
work_keys_str_mv AT leehooyoung comparisonsbetweenlocomatandwalkbotroboticgaittrainingregardingbalanceandlowerextremityfunctionamongnonambulatorychronicacquiredbraininjurysurvivors
AT parkjunghyun comparisonsbetweenlocomatandwalkbotroboticgaittrainingregardingbalanceandlowerextremityfunctionamongnonambulatorychronicacquiredbraininjurysurvivors
AT kimtaewoo comparisonsbetweenlocomatandwalkbotroboticgaittrainingregardingbalanceandlowerextremityfunctionamongnonambulatorychronicacquiredbraininjurysurvivors