Cargando…

Comparison of two vasopressor protocols for preventing hypotension post-spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine infusion decreases hypotension after spinal anesthesia during cesarean section. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of norepinephrine infusion and ephedrine bolus against post-spinal hypotension in parturients. METHODS: In this double-blinded, randomized controlled cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Qian-Qian, Wang, Yong-Hui, Fu, Jing-Wen, Dong, Hai-Long, Yang, Man-Ping, Liu, Duo-Duo, Jiang, Xiao-Fan, Wu, Zhi-Xin, Xiong, Li-Ze, Lu, Zhi-Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8104294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001404
_version_ 1783689465039945728
author Fan, Qian-Qian
Wang, Yong-Hui
Fu, Jing-Wen
Dong, Hai-Long
Yang, Man-Ping
Liu, Duo-Duo
Jiang, Xiao-Fan
Wu, Zhi-Xin
Xiong, Li-Ze
Lu, Zhi-Hong
author_facet Fan, Qian-Qian
Wang, Yong-Hui
Fu, Jing-Wen
Dong, Hai-Long
Yang, Man-Ping
Liu, Duo-Duo
Jiang, Xiao-Fan
Wu, Zhi-Xin
Xiong, Li-Ze
Lu, Zhi-Hong
author_sort Fan, Qian-Qian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine infusion decreases hypotension after spinal anesthesia during cesarean section. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of norepinephrine infusion and ephedrine bolus against post-spinal hypotension in parturients. METHODS: In this double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial, parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomly allocated to receive norepinephrine infusion (0.05 μg·kg(−1)·min(−1)) just before spinal anesthesia continuing for 30 min or ephedrine bolus (0.15 mg/kg) just before spinal anesthesia. A rescue bolus (5 μg norepinephrine for the norepinephrine group, and 5 mg ephedrine for the ephedrine group) was administered whenever hypotension occurred. Our primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension within 30 min of spinal anesthesia administration. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes 30 min after spinal block, and neonatal cerebral oxygenation 10 min after birth. RESULTS: In total, 190 patients were enrolled; of these patients, 177 were included in the final analysis. Fewer patients suffered hypotension in the norepinephrine group than in the ephedrine group (29.5% vs. 44.9%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.95, P = 0.034). Moreover, the tachycardia frequency was lower in the norepinephrine group than in the ephedrine group (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.11–0.44, P < 0.001), and patients suffered less nausea and vomiting (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.11–0.70, P = 0.004). There was no difference in Apgar scores and umbilical arterial blood gas analysis between the two groups. However, neonatal cerebral regional saturations were significantly higher after birth in the norepinephrine group than in the ephedrine group (mean difference: 2.0%, 95% CI: 0.55%–3.45%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia, norepinephrine infusion compared to ephedrine bolus resulted in less hypotension and tachycardia, and exhibited potential neonatal benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02542748; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02542748
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8104294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81042942021-05-10 Comparison of two vasopressor protocols for preventing hypotension post-spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial Fan, Qian-Qian Wang, Yong-Hui Fu, Jing-Wen Dong, Hai-Long Yang, Man-Ping Liu, Duo-Duo Jiang, Xiao-Fan Wu, Zhi-Xin Xiong, Li-Ze Lu, Zhi-Hong Chin Med J (Engl) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine infusion decreases hypotension after spinal anesthesia during cesarean section. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of norepinephrine infusion and ephedrine bolus against post-spinal hypotension in parturients. METHODS: In this double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial, parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomly allocated to receive norepinephrine infusion (0.05 μg·kg(−1)·min(−1)) just before spinal anesthesia continuing for 30 min or ephedrine bolus (0.15 mg/kg) just before spinal anesthesia. A rescue bolus (5 μg norepinephrine for the norepinephrine group, and 5 mg ephedrine for the ephedrine group) was administered whenever hypotension occurred. Our primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension within 30 min of spinal anesthesia administration. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes 30 min after spinal block, and neonatal cerebral oxygenation 10 min after birth. RESULTS: In total, 190 patients were enrolled; of these patients, 177 were included in the final analysis. Fewer patients suffered hypotension in the norepinephrine group than in the ephedrine group (29.5% vs. 44.9%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.95, P = 0.034). Moreover, the tachycardia frequency was lower in the norepinephrine group than in the ephedrine group (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.11–0.44, P < 0.001), and patients suffered less nausea and vomiting (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.11–0.70, P = 0.004). There was no difference in Apgar scores and umbilical arterial blood gas analysis between the two groups. However, neonatal cerebral regional saturations were significantly higher after birth in the norepinephrine group than in the ephedrine group (mean difference: 2.0%, 95% CI: 0.55%–3.45%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia, norepinephrine infusion compared to ephedrine bolus resulted in less hypotension and tachycardia, and exhibited potential neonatal benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02542748; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02542748 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-05 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8104294/ /pubmed/33661141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001404 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Fan, Qian-Qian
Wang, Yong-Hui
Fu, Jing-Wen
Dong, Hai-Long
Yang, Man-Ping
Liu, Duo-Duo
Jiang, Xiao-Fan
Wu, Zhi-Xin
Xiong, Li-Ze
Lu, Zhi-Hong
Comparison of two vasopressor protocols for preventing hypotension post-spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of two vasopressor protocols for preventing hypotension post-spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of two vasopressor protocols for preventing hypotension post-spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of two vasopressor protocols for preventing hypotension post-spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two vasopressor protocols for preventing hypotension post-spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of two vasopressor protocols for preventing hypotension post-spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of two vasopressor protocols for preventing hypotension post-spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8104294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001404
work_keys_str_mv AT fanqianqian comparisonoftwovasopressorprotocolsforpreventinghypotensionpostspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangyonghui comparisonoftwovasopressorprotocolsforpreventinghypotensionpostspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fujingwen comparisonoftwovasopressorprotocolsforpreventinghypotensionpostspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT donghailong comparisonoftwovasopressorprotocolsforpreventinghypotensionpostspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yangmanping comparisonoftwovasopressorprotocolsforpreventinghypotensionpostspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liuduoduo comparisonoftwovasopressorprotocolsforpreventinghypotensionpostspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jiangxiaofan comparisonoftwovasopressorprotocolsforpreventinghypotensionpostspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuzhixin comparisonoftwovasopressorprotocolsforpreventinghypotensionpostspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xionglize comparisonoftwovasopressorprotocolsforpreventinghypotensionpostspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT luzhihong comparisonoftwovasopressorprotocolsforpreventinghypotensionpostspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial