Cargando…

Assessment of body composition in spinal cord injury: A scoping review

The objective of this scoping review was to map the evidence on measurement properties of body composition tools to assess whole-body and regional fat and fat-free mass in adults with SCI, and to identify research gaps in order to set future research priorities. Electronic databases of PubMed, EMBAS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Scheer, Jan W., Totosy de Zepetnek, Julia O., Blauwet, Cheri, Brooke-Wavell, Katherine, Graham-Paulson, Terri, Leonard, Amber N., Webborn, Nick, Goosey-Tolfrey, Victoria L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8104368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33961647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251142
_version_ 1783689480167751680
author van der Scheer, Jan W.
Totosy de Zepetnek, Julia O.
Blauwet, Cheri
Brooke-Wavell, Katherine
Graham-Paulson, Terri
Leonard, Amber N.
Webborn, Nick
Goosey-Tolfrey, Victoria L.
author_facet van der Scheer, Jan W.
Totosy de Zepetnek, Julia O.
Blauwet, Cheri
Brooke-Wavell, Katherine
Graham-Paulson, Terri
Leonard, Amber N.
Webborn, Nick
Goosey-Tolfrey, Victoria L.
author_sort van der Scheer, Jan W.
collection PubMed
description The objective of this scoping review was to map the evidence on measurement properties of body composition tools to assess whole-body and regional fat and fat-free mass in adults with SCI, and to identify research gaps in order to set future research priorities. Electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched up to April 2020. Included studies employed assessments related to whole-body or regional fat and/or fat-free mass and provided data to quantify measurement properties that involved adults with SCI. All searches and data extractions were conducted by two independent reviewers. The scoping review was designed and conducted together with an expert panel (n = 8) that represented research, clinical, nutritional and lived SCI experience. The panel collaboratively determined the scope and design of the review and interpreted its findings. Additionally, the expert panel reached out to their professional networks to gain further stakeholder feedback via interactive practitioner surveys and workshops with people with SCI. The research gaps identified by the review, together with discussions among the expert panel including consideration of the survey and workshop feedback, informed the formulation of future research priorities. A total of 42 eligible articles were identified (1,011 males and 143 females). The only tool supported by studies showing both acceptable test-retest reliability and convergent validity was whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The survey/workshop participants considered the measurement burden of DXA acceptable as long as it was reliable, valid and would do no harm (e.g. radiation, skin damage). Practitioners considered cost and accessibility of DXA major barriers in applied settings. The survey/workshop participants expressed a preference towards simple tools if they could be confident in their reliability and validity. This review suggests that future research should prioritize reliability and validity studies on: (1) DXA as a surrogate ‘gold standard’ tool to assess whole-body composition, regional fat and fat-free mass; and (2) skinfold thickness and waist circumference as practical low-cost tools to assess regional fat mass in persons with SCI, and (3) females to explore potential sex differences of body composition assessment tools. Registration review protocol: CRD42018090187 (PROSPERO).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8104368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81043682021-05-18 Assessment of body composition in spinal cord injury: A scoping review van der Scheer, Jan W. Totosy de Zepetnek, Julia O. Blauwet, Cheri Brooke-Wavell, Katherine Graham-Paulson, Terri Leonard, Amber N. Webborn, Nick Goosey-Tolfrey, Victoria L. PLoS One Research Article The objective of this scoping review was to map the evidence on measurement properties of body composition tools to assess whole-body and regional fat and fat-free mass in adults with SCI, and to identify research gaps in order to set future research priorities. Electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched up to April 2020. Included studies employed assessments related to whole-body or regional fat and/or fat-free mass and provided data to quantify measurement properties that involved adults with SCI. All searches and data extractions were conducted by two independent reviewers. The scoping review was designed and conducted together with an expert panel (n = 8) that represented research, clinical, nutritional and lived SCI experience. The panel collaboratively determined the scope and design of the review and interpreted its findings. Additionally, the expert panel reached out to their professional networks to gain further stakeholder feedback via interactive practitioner surveys and workshops with people with SCI. The research gaps identified by the review, together with discussions among the expert panel including consideration of the survey and workshop feedback, informed the formulation of future research priorities. A total of 42 eligible articles were identified (1,011 males and 143 females). The only tool supported by studies showing both acceptable test-retest reliability and convergent validity was whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The survey/workshop participants considered the measurement burden of DXA acceptable as long as it was reliable, valid and would do no harm (e.g. radiation, skin damage). Practitioners considered cost and accessibility of DXA major barriers in applied settings. The survey/workshop participants expressed a preference towards simple tools if they could be confident in their reliability and validity. This review suggests that future research should prioritize reliability and validity studies on: (1) DXA as a surrogate ‘gold standard’ tool to assess whole-body composition, regional fat and fat-free mass; and (2) skinfold thickness and waist circumference as practical low-cost tools to assess regional fat mass in persons with SCI, and (3) females to explore potential sex differences of body composition assessment tools. Registration review protocol: CRD42018090187 (PROSPERO). Public Library of Science 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8104368/ /pubmed/33961647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251142 Text en © 2021 van der Scheer et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Scheer, Jan W.
Totosy de Zepetnek, Julia O.
Blauwet, Cheri
Brooke-Wavell, Katherine
Graham-Paulson, Terri
Leonard, Amber N.
Webborn, Nick
Goosey-Tolfrey, Victoria L.
Assessment of body composition in spinal cord injury: A scoping review
title Assessment of body composition in spinal cord injury: A scoping review
title_full Assessment of body composition in spinal cord injury: A scoping review
title_fullStr Assessment of body composition in spinal cord injury: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of body composition in spinal cord injury: A scoping review
title_short Assessment of body composition in spinal cord injury: A scoping review
title_sort assessment of body composition in spinal cord injury: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8104368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33961647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251142
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderscheerjanw assessmentofbodycompositioninspinalcordinjuryascopingreview
AT totosydezepetnekjuliao assessmentofbodycompositioninspinalcordinjuryascopingreview
AT blauwetcheri assessmentofbodycompositioninspinalcordinjuryascopingreview
AT brookewavellkatherine assessmentofbodycompositioninspinalcordinjuryascopingreview
AT grahampaulsonterri assessmentofbodycompositioninspinalcordinjuryascopingreview
AT leonardambern assessmentofbodycompositioninspinalcordinjuryascopingreview
AT webbornnick assessmentofbodycompositioninspinalcordinjuryascopingreview
AT gooseytolfreyvictorial assessmentofbodycompositioninspinalcordinjuryascopingreview