Cargando…

Xiao Chai Hu Tang for Peptic Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

A peptic ulcer (PU) is a digestive disorder most commonly found in clinical practice. An oriental herbal formula, Xiao Chai Hu Tang (XCHT), has been used to treat PU for an extended period in China. The effectiveness and safety of XCHT in treating peptic ulcers was evaluated using a systematic revie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Min, Dan, Wenchao, Zhang, Hui, Yun, Yong'en, He, Qingyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34012475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6693677
_version_ 1783689544016592896
author Li, Min
Dan, Wenchao
Zhang, Hui
Yun, Yong'en
He, Qingyong
author_facet Li, Min
Dan, Wenchao
Zhang, Hui
Yun, Yong'en
He, Qingyong
author_sort Li, Min
collection PubMed
description A peptic ulcer (PU) is a digestive disorder most commonly found in clinical practice. An oriental herbal formula, Xiao Chai Hu Tang (XCHT), has been used to treat PU for an extended period in China. The effectiveness and safety of XCHT in treating peptic ulcers was evaluated using a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies were systematically retrieved from CNKI, Embase, Medline, PubMed, SinoMed, VIP, Wanfang, and Web of Science. The following information was extracted from the relevant RCTs: the clinical efficacy rate, recurrence rate, clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine, and the adverse effects. 13 RCTs, including 1334 patients, were included in this review. The meta-analysis showed that treatment with XCHT was superior to conventional pharmacotherapy (CPT) in improving the clinical efficacy rate (RR: 1.20, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 1.08–1.34, P=0.0007), poor appetite (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.15–0.61, P=0.0009), abdominal distension (RR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39–0.96, P=0.03), vomiting (RR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.19–0.55, P < 0.0001), and stomach pain (RR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.19–0.68, P=0.002) and reducing adverse events (RR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07–0.69, P=0.009). XCHT considerably increased the total clinical efficacy rate (RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.15–1.30, P < 0.00001) as both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy. The recurrence rate (RR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.16–0.52, P < 0.0001) was remarkably decreased in the XCHT plus CPT group. The meta-analysis did not show a significant beneficial effect of XCHT compared with CPT in reducing the recurrence rate (RR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.07–3.10, P=0.42) and acid reflux (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.47–1.23, P=0.26). Our findings show that XCHT can treat peptic ulcers as part of an alternative medicine approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8105105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81051052021-05-18 Xiao Chai Hu Tang for Peptic Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Li, Min Dan, Wenchao Zhang, Hui Yun, Yong'en He, Qingyong Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Review Article A peptic ulcer (PU) is a digestive disorder most commonly found in clinical practice. An oriental herbal formula, Xiao Chai Hu Tang (XCHT), has been used to treat PU for an extended period in China. The effectiveness and safety of XCHT in treating peptic ulcers was evaluated using a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies were systematically retrieved from CNKI, Embase, Medline, PubMed, SinoMed, VIP, Wanfang, and Web of Science. The following information was extracted from the relevant RCTs: the clinical efficacy rate, recurrence rate, clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine, and the adverse effects. 13 RCTs, including 1334 patients, were included in this review. The meta-analysis showed that treatment with XCHT was superior to conventional pharmacotherapy (CPT) in improving the clinical efficacy rate (RR: 1.20, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 1.08–1.34, P=0.0007), poor appetite (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.15–0.61, P=0.0009), abdominal distension (RR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39–0.96, P=0.03), vomiting (RR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.19–0.55, P < 0.0001), and stomach pain (RR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.19–0.68, P=0.002) and reducing adverse events (RR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07–0.69, P=0.009). XCHT considerably increased the total clinical efficacy rate (RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.15–1.30, P < 0.00001) as both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy. The recurrence rate (RR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.16–0.52, P < 0.0001) was remarkably decreased in the XCHT plus CPT group. The meta-analysis did not show a significant beneficial effect of XCHT compared with CPT in reducing the recurrence rate (RR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.07–3.10, P=0.42) and acid reflux (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.47–1.23, P=0.26). Our findings show that XCHT can treat peptic ulcers as part of an alternative medicine approach. Hindawi 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8105105/ /pubmed/34012475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6693677 Text en Copyright © 2021 Min Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Li, Min
Dan, Wenchao
Zhang, Hui
Yun, Yong'en
He, Qingyong
Xiao Chai Hu Tang for Peptic Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Xiao Chai Hu Tang for Peptic Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Xiao Chai Hu Tang for Peptic Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Xiao Chai Hu Tang for Peptic Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Xiao Chai Hu Tang for Peptic Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Xiao Chai Hu Tang for Peptic Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort xiao chai hu tang for peptic ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34012475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6693677
work_keys_str_mv AT limin xiaochaihutangforpepticulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT danwenchao xiaochaihutangforpepticulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhanghui xiaochaihutangforpepticulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yunyongen xiaochaihutangforpepticulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT heqingyong xiaochaihutangforpepticulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials