Cargando…

Bridging the gap: a pre-post feasibility study of embedding exercise therapy into a co-located cancer unit

PURPOSE: To establish the feasibility of embedding a flexible, exercise-based rehabilitation program into a cancer treatment unit to allow cancer survivors early exercise support. METHOD: A pre-post study was conducted using Bowen’s Framework to describe key domains of feasibility: demand (referrals...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dennett, Amy M., Zappa, Bernadette, Wong, Rachel, Ting, Stephen B., Williams, Kimberley, Peiris, Casey L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33963458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06261-2
_version_ 1783689553071046656
author Dennett, Amy M.
Zappa, Bernadette
Wong, Rachel
Ting, Stephen B.
Williams, Kimberley
Peiris, Casey L.
author_facet Dennett, Amy M.
Zappa, Bernadette
Wong, Rachel
Ting, Stephen B.
Williams, Kimberley
Peiris, Casey L.
author_sort Dennett, Amy M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To establish the feasibility of embedding a flexible, exercise-based rehabilitation program into a cancer treatment unit to allow cancer survivors early exercise support. METHOD: A pre-post study was conducted using Bowen’s Framework to describe key domains of feasibility: demand (referrals), acceptability (uptake, attendance, satisfaction), implementation (resources), practicality (adverse events, costs) and limited-efficacy (function, quality of life, self-efficacy). Participants were medically stable, adult cancer survivors receiving curative or palliative treatment for cancer at the health service. Participants completed an 8-week home or hospital-based exercise program. Data were analysed descriptively. Standardised mean differences (Hedge’s g) and mean differences were calculated to determine effect size and clinical significance. RESULTS: The exercise-based rehabilitation service received 155 referrals over 6 months. Of those eligible, 73/119 (61%) commenced. Participants opting for twice-weekly, hospital-based exercise attended 9/16 (56%) sessions. Participants reported high satisfaction and there were no major adverse events. The program utilised existing resources, with the predominant cost being staff. The average health service cost per participant was AUD $1,104. Participants made clinically significant gains in function (6-min walk distance; + 73 m, 95% confidence interval 49 to 96) and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 Global quality of life; + 8 units, 95% confidence interval 3 to 13). CONCLUSION: Implementation of exercise-based rehabilitation in a co-located cancer unit was safe and feasible. Access, patient and staff education and establishing funding streams are important implementation considerations. Implications for cancer survivors Access to exercise in a cancer unit provides opportunity for early intervention to optimise function during treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06261-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8105143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81051432021-05-10 Bridging the gap: a pre-post feasibility study of embedding exercise therapy into a co-located cancer unit Dennett, Amy M. Zappa, Bernadette Wong, Rachel Ting, Stephen B. Williams, Kimberley Peiris, Casey L. Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: To establish the feasibility of embedding a flexible, exercise-based rehabilitation program into a cancer treatment unit to allow cancer survivors early exercise support. METHOD: A pre-post study was conducted using Bowen’s Framework to describe key domains of feasibility: demand (referrals), acceptability (uptake, attendance, satisfaction), implementation (resources), practicality (adverse events, costs) and limited-efficacy (function, quality of life, self-efficacy). Participants were medically stable, adult cancer survivors receiving curative or palliative treatment for cancer at the health service. Participants completed an 8-week home or hospital-based exercise program. Data were analysed descriptively. Standardised mean differences (Hedge’s g) and mean differences were calculated to determine effect size and clinical significance. RESULTS: The exercise-based rehabilitation service received 155 referrals over 6 months. Of those eligible, 73/119 (61%) commenced. Participants opting for twice-weekly, hospital-based exercise attended 9/16 (56%) sessions. Participants reported high satisfaction and there were no major adverse events. The program utilised existing resources, with the predominant cost being staff. The average health service cost per participant was AUD $1,104. Participants made clinically significant gains in function (6-min walk distance; + 73 m, 95% confidence interval 49 to 96) and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 Global quality of life; + 8 units, 95% confidence interval 3 to 13). CONCLUSION: Implementation of exercise-based rehabilitation in a co-located cancer unit was safe and feasible. Access, patient and staff education and establishing funding streams are important implementation considerations. Implications for cancer survivors Access to exercise in a cancer unit provides opportunity for early intervention to optimise function during treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06261-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8105143/ /pubmed/33963458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06261-2 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dennett, Amy M.
Zappa, Bernadette
Wong, Rachel
Ting, Stephen B.
Williams, Kimberley
Peiris, Casey L.
Bridging the gap: a pre-post feasibility study of embedding exercise therapy into a co-located cancer unit
title Bridging the gap: a pre-post feasibility study of embedding exercise therapy into a co-located cancer unit
title_full Bridging the gap: a pre-post feasibility study of embedding exercise therapy into a co-located cancer unit
title_fullStr Bridging the gap: a pre-post feasibility study of embedding exercise therapy into a co-located cancer unit
title_full_unstemmed Bridging the gap: a pre-post feasibility study of embedding exercise therapy into a co-located cancer unit
title_short Bridging the gap: a pre-post feasibility study of embedding exercise therapy into a co-located cancer unit
title_sort bridging the gap: a pre-post feasibility study of embedding exercise therapy into a co-located cancer unit
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33963458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06261-2
work_keys_str_mv AT dennettamym bridgingthegapaprepostfeasibilitystudyofembeddingexercisetherapyintoacolocatedcancerunit
AT zappabernadette bridgingthegapaprepostfeasibilitystudyofembeddingexercisetherapyintoacolocatedcancerunit
AT wongrachel bridgingthegapaprepostfeasibilitystudyofembeddingexercisetherapyintoacolocatedcancerunit
AT tingstephenb bridgingthegapaprepostfeasibilitystudyofembeddingexercisetherapyintoacolocatedcancerunit
AT williamskimberley bridgingthegapaprepostfeasibilitystudyofembeddingexercisetherapyintoacolocatedcancerunit
AT peiriscaseyl bridgingthegapaprepostfeasibilitystudyofembeddingexercisetherapyintoacolocatedcancerunit