Cargando…
Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction
Intrinsically disordered proteins, defying the traditional protein structure–function paradigm, are a challenge to study experimentally. Because a large part of our knowledge rests on computational predictions, it is crucial that their accuracy is high. The Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic D...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3 |
Sumario: | Intrinsically disordered proteins, defying the traditional protein structure–function paradigm, are a challenge to study experimentally. Because a large part of our knowledge rests on computational predictions, it is crucial that their accuracy is high. The Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID) experiment was established as a community-based blind test to determine the state of the art in prediction of intrinsically disordered regions and the subset of residues involved in binding. A total of 43 methods were evaluated on a dataset of 646 proteins from DisProt. The best methods use deep learning techniques and notably outperform physicochemical methods. The top disorder predictor has F(max) = 0.483 on the full dataset and F(max) = 0.792 following filtering out of bona fide structured regions. Disordered binding regions remain hard to predict, with F(max) = 0.231. Interestingly, computing times among methods can vary by up to four orders of magnitude. |
---|