Cargando…

Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction

Intrinsically disordered proteins, defying the traditional protein structure–function paradigm, are a challenge to study experimentally. Because a large part of our knowledge rests on computational predictions, it is crucial that their accuracy is high. The Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Necci, Marco, Piovesan, Damiano, Tosatto, Silvio C. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3
_version_ 1783689559966482432
author Necci, Marco
Piovesan, Damiano
Tosatto, Silvio C. E.
author_facet Necci, Marco
Piovesan, Damiano
Tosatto, Silvio C. E.
author_sort Necci, Marco
collection PubMed
description Intrinsically disordered proteins, defying the traditional protein structure–function paradigm, are a challenge to study experimentally. Because a large part of our knowledge rests on computational predictions, it is crucial that their accuracy is high. The Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID) experiment was established as a community-based blind test to determine the state of the art in prediction of intrinsically disordered regions and the subset of residues involved in binding. A total of 43 methods were evaluated on a dataset of 646 proteins from DisProt. The best methods use deep learning techniques and notably outperform physicochemical methods. The top disorder predictor has F(max) = 0.483 on the full dataset and F(max) = 0.792 following filtering out of bona fide structured regions. Disordered binding regions remain hard to predict, with F(max) = 0.231. Interestingly, computing times among methods can vary by up to four orders of magnitude.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8105172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81051722021-05-24 Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction Necci, Marco Piovesan, Damiano Tosatto, Silvio C. E. Nat Methods Analysis Intrinsically disordered proteins, defying the traditional protein structure–function paradigm, are a challenge to study experimentally. Because a large part of our knowledge rests on computational predictions, it is crucial that their accuracy is high. The Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID) experiment was established as a community-based blind test to determine the state of the art in prediction of intrinsically disordered regions and the subset of residues involved in binding. A total of 43 methods were evaluated on a dataset of 646 proteins from DisProt. The best methods use deep learning techniques and notably outperform physicochemical methods. The top disorder predictor has F(max) = 0.483 on the full dataset and F(max) = 0.792 following filtering out of bona fide structured regions. Disordered binding regions remain hard to predict, with F(max) = 0.231. Interestingly, computing times among methods can vary by up to four orders of magnitude. Nature Publishing Group US 2021-04-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8105172/ /pubmed/33875885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Analysis
Necci, Marco
Piovesan, Damiano
Tosatto, Silvio C. E.
Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction
title Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction
title_full Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction
title_fullStr Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction
title_full_unstemmed Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction
title_short Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction
title_sort critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction
topic Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3
work_keys_str_mv AT neccimarco criticalassessmentofproteinintrinsicdisorderprediction
AT piovesandamiano criticalassessmentofproteinintrinsicdisorderprediction
AT criticalassessmentofproteinintrinsicdisorderprediction
AT criticalassessmentofproteinintrinsicdisorderprediction
AT tosattosilvioce criticalassessmentofproteinintrinsicdisorderprediction