Cargando…

Should We Be Using Upstream Beta-Blocker Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Controversy exists whether beta-blockers should be given before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or to defer their administration for up to 24 hours. RECENT FINDINGS: Animal studies, most of them conducted in the 1970s and 1980s, showed evidence that early beta-blo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giannakopoulos, Georgios, Noble, Stephane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33961118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01494-3
_version_ 1783689566224384000
author Giannakopoulos, Georgios
Noble, Stephane
author_facet Giannakopoulos, Georgios
Noble, Stephane
author_sort Giannakopoulos, Georgios
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Controversy exists whether beta-blockers should be given before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or to defer their administration for up to 24 hours. RECENT FINDINGS: Animal studies, most of them conducted in the 1970s and 1980s, showed evidence that early beta-blocker administration may reduce infarct size. Subsequent human studies had mixed results on infarct size and survival. More specifically, in the current primary PCI era, only four studies evaluated the impact of early intravenous beta-blocker administration after acute myocardial infarction, only two of them before PCI. All studies agree that in hemodynamically stable patients, early intravenous beta-blocker administration is safe and protected against malignant arrhythmias. Nevertheless, results on infarct size and mortality are equivocal. SUMMARY: Considering the heterogeneity of currently available data, further studies are still needed to assess the benefit of early injection of metoprolol in STEMI patients in a large double-blinded and randomized design versus placebo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8105203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81052032021-05-11 Should We Be Using Upstream Beta-Blocker Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction? Giannakopoulos, Georgios Noble, Stephane Curr Cardiol Rep Interventional Cardiology (SR Bailey and T Helmy, Section Editors) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Controversy exists whether beta-blockers should be given before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or to defer their administration for up to 24 hours. RECENT FINDINGS: Animal studies, most of them conducted in the 1970s and 1980s, showed evidence that early beta-blocker administration may reduce infarct size. Subsequent human studies had mixed results on infarct size and survival. More specifically, in the current primary PCI era, only four studies evaluated the impact of early intravenous beta-blocker administration after acute myocardial infarction, only two of them before PCI. All studies agree that in hemodynamically stable patients, early intravenous beta-blocker administration is safe and protected against malignant arrhythmias. Nevertheless, results on infarct size and mortality are equivocal. SUMMARY: Considering the heterogeneity of currently available data, further studies are still needed to assess the benefit of early injection of metoprolol in STEMI patients in a large double-blinded and randomized design versus placebo. Springer US 2021-05-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8105203/ /pubmed/33961118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01494-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Interventional Cardiology (SR Bailey and T Helmy, Section Editors)
Giannakopoulos, Georgios
Noble, Stephane
Should We Be Using Upstream Beta-Blocker Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction?
title Should We Be Using Upstream Beta-Blocker Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction?
title_full Should We Be Using Upstream Beta-Blocker Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction?
title_fullStr Should We Be Using Upstream Beta-Blocker Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction?
title_full_unstemmed Should We Be Using Upstream Beta-Blocker Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction?
title_short Should We Be Using Upstream Beta-Blocker Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction?
title_sort should we be using upstream beta-blocker therapy for acute myocardial infarction?
topic Interventional Cardiology (SR Bailey and T Helmy, Section Editors)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33961118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01494-3
work_keys_str_mv AT giannakopoulosgeorgios shouldwebeusingupstreambetablockertherapyforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT noblestephane shouldwebeusingupstreambetablockertherapyforacutemyocardialinfarction