Cargando…
Wie gut sehen unsere ABC-Schützen?
BACKGROUND: Within the framework of the German pediatric screening examinations, the checks include visual functions. There is no ophthalmological screening examination in childhood in Germany. This study investigated whether participation in the pediatric screening examinations U8 (at the end of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32833115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00347-020-01194-3 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Within the framework of the German pediatric screening examinations, the checks include visual functions. There is no ophthalmological screening examination in childhood in Germany. This study investigated whether participation in the pediatric screening examinations U8 (at the end of the fourth year of life) and U9 (at the beginning of the sixth year of life) is associated with the results of visual acuity, which are compiled at the school entry examinations (SEU). METHODS: This study evaluated data of the SEU for school the enrollment years 2009/2010–2014/2015 of the State of Rhineland-Palatinate. In these years visual acuity was assessed using the Rodenstock visual testing device (E-hooks; Rodenstock intruments GmbH, Ottobrunn, Deutschland) wearing glasses if present. The association between participation in the U8 and U9 screening examinations and the presence of unilateral and bilateral visual acuity <0.7 was investigated using multiple logistic regression adjusted for important disturbance variables. RESULTS: Data from 189,704 children (91,041 girls, 98,663 boys) from 35 out of 36 districts were included. A visual acuity <0.7 was measured in 8416 (4.4%) children and in both eyes in 4345 (2.3%) children. The participation rates in the U8 and U9 were 93.9% and 93.3%, respectively. There was a negative association between participation in the U8 and U9 and a unilateral or bilateral SEU visual acuity <0.7 (adjusted odds ratio, OR 0.68, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.61–0.75; p < 0.01, N = 124,467/adjusted OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.51–0.65; p < 0.01, N = 121,496). CONCLUSION: The proportion of children with visual acuity <0.7 at the SEU was high. Children who were examined in the U8 and U9 had a better chance for a good visual acuity in the school entry examination. |
---|