Cargando…

Performance evaluation of the Q.Clear reconstruction framework versus conventional reconstruction algorithms for quantitative brain PET-MR studies

BACKGROUND: Q.Clear is a Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm that presents improvements in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in clinical positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Brain studies in research require a reconstruction that provides a good spatial resolution and accentu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ribeiro, Daniela, Hallett, William, Tavares, Adriana A. S.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:	Original Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33961164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00386-3

Ejemplares similares

Assessing the impact of different penalty factors of the Bayesian reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear on in vivo low count kinetic analysis of [(11)C]PHNO brain PET-MR studies
por: Ribeiro, Daniela, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Impact of the Q.Clear reconstruction algorithm on the interpretation of PET/CT images in patients with lymphoma
por: Wyrzykowski, Michał, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Optimization of Q.Clear reconstruction for dynamic (18)F PET imaging
por: Lysvik, Elisabeth Kirkeby, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The effect of Q.Clear reconstruction on quantification and spatial resolution of 18F-FDG PET in simultaneous PET/MR
por: Tian, Defeng, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear®) in comparison with the OSEM reconstruction on low contrast PET hypoxic images
por: Texte, Edgar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) of (18)F-fluciclovine PET for imaging of recurrent prostate cancer: semi-quantitative and clinical evaluation
por: Teoh, Eugene J, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Impact of γ factor in the penalty function of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) to achieve high-resolution PET images
por: Miwa, Kenta, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Impact of the Noise Penalty Factor on Quantification in Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (Q.Clear) Reconstructions of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Scans
por: Rijnsdorp, Sjoerd, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF)
por: Rogasch, Julian M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Phantom and clinical assessment of small pulmonary nodules using Q.Clear reconstruction on a silicon-photomultiplier-based time-of-flight PET/CT system
por: Wu, Zhifang, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of Image Quality and Quantification Parameters between Q.Clear and OSEM Reconstruction Methods on FDG-PET/CT Images in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer
por: Naghavi-Behzad, Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Correction: Rijnsdorp et al. Impact of the Noise Penalty Factor on Quantification in Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (Q.Clear) Reconstructions of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Scans. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 847
por: Rijnsdorp, Sjoerd, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for (18)F-NaF bone PET/CT images acquired over shorter durations using a custom-designed phantom
por: Yoshii, Tokiya, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The effects of various penalty parameter values in Q.Clear algorithm for rectal cancer detection on (18)F-FDG images using a BGO-based PET/CT scanner: a phantom and clinical study
por: Sadeghi, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

High-resolution, quantitative 3D PET image reconstruction for the Siemens hybrid 3T MR/BrainPET scanner using the PET reconstruction software toolkit (PRESTO)
por: Scheins, Juergen, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Dynamic brain PET/MR using TOF reconstruction
por: Khalighi, Mohammad Mehdi, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Intercomparison of MR‐informed PET image reconstruction methods
por: Bland, James, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Blob-Based Time-of-Flight PET Image Reconstruction in Hybrid Brain PET/MR Imaging
por: Leemans, Eva L., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging
por: Shi, Ximin, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Simultaneous reconstruction of attenuation and activity for non–TOF PET/MR using MR prior information
por: Heußer, Thorsten, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

MR constrained simultaneous reconstruction of activity and attenuation maps in brain TOF-PET/MR imaging
por: Mehranian, Abolfazl, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Optimization of PET reconstruction algorithm, SUV thresholding algorithm and PET acquisition time in clinical (11)C-acetate PET/CT
por: Strandberg, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

PET NEMA IQ Phantom dataset: image reconstruction settings for quantitative PET imaging
por: Vosoughi, Habibeh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Image reconstruction of mMR PET data using the open source software STIR
por: Markiewicz, Pawel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Multi‐modal synergistic PET and MR reconstruction using mutually weighted quadratic priors
por: Mehranian, Abolfazl, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Quantitative performance and optimal regularization parameter in block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstructions in clinical (68)Ga-PSMA PET/MR
por: ter Voert, Edwin E. G. W., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Robust Framework for PET Image Reconstruction Incorporating System and Measurement Uncertainties
por: Liu, Huafeng, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Deliverable 2.8 Development and optimization of TOF-PET reconstruction algorithms
por: The ENVISION Collaboration
Publicado: (2014)

Optimization, evaluation, and comparison of standard algorithms for image reconstruction with the VIP-PET
por: Mikhaylova, E., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors
por: Liu, Yao, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

MR Image Reconstruction Based on Iterative Split Bregman Algorithm and Nonlocal Total Variation
por: Gopi, Varun P., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Diagnostic performance of deep learning–based reconstruction algorithm in 3D MR neurography
por: Ensle, Falko, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Improved image reconstruction of (89)Zr-immunoPET studies using a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm
por: Kirchner, Julian, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Stiffness reconstruction methods for MR elastography
por: Fovargue, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The impact of reconstruction algorithms and time of flight information on PET/CT image quality
por: Suljic, Alen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Ultra fast, accurate PET image reconstruction for the Siemens hybrid MR/BrainPET scanner using raw LOR data
por: Scheins, Juergen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparison of different tube-of-response (TOR) models for resolution recovery in PET image reconstruction for the Philips Ingenuity TF PET/MR
por: Lougovski, Alexandr, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Point-spread function reconstructed PET images of sub-centimeter lesions are not quantitative
por: Munk, O. L., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Enhancement of Partial Volume Correction in MR-Guided PET Image Reconstruction by Using MRI Voxel Sizes
Publicado: (2018)

AI for PET image reconstruction
por: Reader, Andrew J, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_kge614mdc049ljceqijtgeic1e