Cargando…
The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response
This paper highlights the principal features of the M(w)5.4 Zagreb earthquake. Located within the city limits at a depth of 10 km, the earthquake generated a peak ground acceleration of more than 0.2 g and a maximum spectral acceleration of about 0.6 g at 0.1 s in the historic downtown area. The sit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01117-w |
_version_ | 1783689656175427584 |
---|---|
author | Atalić, Josip Uroš, Mario Šavor Novak, Marta Demšić, Marija Nastev, Miroslav |
author_facet | Atalić, Josip Uroš, Mario Šavor Novak, Marta Demšić, Marija Nastev, Miroslav |
author_sort | Atalić, Josip |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper highlights the principal features of the M(w)5.4 Zagreb earthquake. Located within the city limits at a depth of 10 km, the earthquake generated a peak ground acceleration of more than 0.2 g and a maximum spectral acceleration of about 0.6 g at 0.1 s in the historic downtown area. The situation was particularly challenging since the event occurred amid a partial Covid-19 lockdown at temperatures close to 0 °C, emphasizing the extensive and complex vulnerability of the local communities and individuals. 27 people were reported severely injured, one of which later died. The surprisingly high economic costs, needed to achieve a full reconstruction of damaged buildings and infrastructure in the affected area, are currently evaluated at more than 10B euros. Description of the organization of the emergency response in the first days and the observed damage to buildings is given with typical examples. The focus is on the performance of older masonry residential and cultural heritage buildings in the historic downtown, their inspection and evaluation of damage to structural and non-structural components. This information provides the basis for understanding of the negative impacts and clarifies the overall context identifying the enablers and barriers to the still ongoing recovery process. It also helps to increase the awareness of the seismic vulnerability of European cities with similar construction practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8105706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81057062021-05-10 The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response Atalić, Josip Uroš, Mario Šavor Novak, Marta Demšić, Marija Nastev, Miroslav Bull Earthquake Eng Case Study Reports This paper highlights the principal features of the M(w)5.4 Zagreb earthquake. Located within the city limits at a depth of 10 km, the earthquake generated a peak ground acceleration of more than 0.2 g and a maximum spectral acceleration of about 0.6 g at 0.1 s in the historic downtown area. The situation was particularly challenging since the event occurred amid a partial Covid-19 lockdown at temperatures close to 0 °C, emphasizing the extensive and complex vulnerability of the local communities and individuals. 27 people were reported severely injured, one of which later died. The surprisingly high economic costs, needed to achieve a full reconstruction of damaged buildings and infrastructure in the affected area, are currently evaluated at more than 10B euros. Description of the organization of the emergency response in the first days and the observed damage to buildings is given with typical examples. The focus is on the performance of older masonry residential and cultural heritage buildings in the historic downtown, their inspection and evaluation of damage to structural and non-structural components. This information provides the basis for understanding of the negative impacts and clarifies the overall context identifying the enablers and barriers to the still ongoing recovery process. It also helps to increase the awareness of the seismic vulnerability of European cities with similar construction practices. Springer Netherlands 2021-05-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8105706/ /pubmed/35210984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01117-w Text en © Crown 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Case Study Reports Atalić, Josip Uroš, Mario Šavor Novak, Marta Demšić, Marija Nastev, Miroslav The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response |
title | The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response |
title_full | The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response |
title_fullStr | The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response |
title_full_unstemmed | The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response |
title_short | The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response |
title_sort | m(w)5.4 zagreb (croatia) earthquake of march 22, 2020: impacts and response |
topic | Case Study Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01117-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atalicjosip themw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse AT urosmario themw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse AT savornovakmarta themw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse AT demsicmarija themw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse AT nastevmiroslav themw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse AT atalicjosip mw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse AT urosmario mw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse AT savornovakmarta mw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse AT demsicmarija mw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse AT nastevmiroslav mw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse |