Cargando…

The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response

This paper highlights the principal features of the M(w)5.4 Zagreb earthquake. Located within the city limits at a depth of 10 km, the earthquake generated a peak ground acceleration of more than 0.2 g and a maximum spectral acceleration of about 0.6 g at 0.1 s in the historic downtown area. The sit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atalić, Josip, Uroš, Mario, Šavor Novak, Marta, Demšić, Marija, Nastev, Miroslav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01117-w
_version_ 1783689656175427584
author Atalić, Josip
Uroš, Mario
Šavor Novak, Marta
Demšić, Marija
Nastev, Miroslav
author_facet Atalić, Josip
Uroš, Mario
Šavor Novak, Marta
Demšić, Marija
Nastev, Miroslav
author_sort Atalić, Josip
collection PubMed
description This paper highlights the principal features of the M(w)5.4 Zagreb earthquake. Located within the city limits at a depth of 10 km, the earthquake generated a peak ground acceleration of more than 0.2 g and a maximum spectral acceleration of about 0.6 g at 0.1 s in the historic downtown area. The situation was particularly challenging since the event occurred amid a partial Covid-19 lockdown at temperatures close to 0 °C, emphasizing the extensive and complex vulnerability of the local communities and individuals. 27 people were reported severely injured, one of which later died. The surprisingly high economic costs, needed to achieve a full reconstruction of damaged buildings and infrastructure in the affected area, are currently evaluated at more than 10B euros. Description of the organization of the emergency response in the first days and the observed damage to buildings is given with typical examples. The focus is on the performance of older masonry residential and cultural heritage buildings in the historic downtown, their inspection and evaluation of damage to structural and non-structural components. This information provides the basis for understanding of the negative impacts and clarifies the overall context identifying the enablers and barriers to the still ongoing recovery process. It also helps to increase the awareness of the seismic vulnerability of European cities with similar construction practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8105706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81057062021-05-10 The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response Atalić, Josip Uroš, Mario Šavor Novak, Marta Demšić, Marija Nastev, Miroslav Bull Earthquake Eng Case Study Reports This paper highlights the principal features of the M(w)5.4 Zagreb earthquake. Located within the city limits at a depth of 10 km, the earthquake generated a peak ground acceleration of more than 0.2 g and a maximum spectral acceleration of about 0.6 g at 0.1 s in the historic downtown area. The situation was particularly challenging since the event occurred amid a partial Covid-19 lockdown at temperatures close to 0 °C, emphasizing the extensive and complex vulnerability of the local communities and individuals. 27 people were reported severely injured, one of which later died. The surprisingly high economic costs, needed to achieve a full reconstruction of damaged buildings and infrastructure in the affected area, are currently evaluated at more than 10B euros. Description of the organization of the emergency response in the first days and the observed damage to buildings is given with typical examples. The focus is on the performance of older masonry residential and cultural heritage buildings in the historic downtown, their inspection and evaluation of damage to structural and non-structural components. This information provides the basis for understanding of the negative impacts and clarifies the overall context identifying the enablers and barriers to the still ongoing recovery process. It also helps to increase the awareness of the seismic vulnerability of European cities with similar construction practices. Springer Netherlands 2021-05-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8105706/ /pubmed/35210984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01117-w Text en © Crown 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Case Study Reports
Atalić, Josip
Uroš, Mario
Šavor Novak, Marta
Demšić, Marija
Nastev, Miroslav
The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response
title The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response
title_full The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response
title_fullStr The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response
title_full_unstemmed The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response
title_short The M(w)5.4 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake of March 22, 2020: impacts and response
title_sort m(w)5.4 zagreb (croatia) earthquake of march 22, 2020: impacts and response
topic Case Study Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01117-w
work_keys_str_mv AT atalicjosip themw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse
AT urosmario themw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse
AT savornovakmarta themw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse
AT demsicmarija themw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse
AT nastevmiroslav themw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse
AT atalicjosip mw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse
AT urosmario mw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse
AT savornovakmarta mw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse
AT demsicmarija mw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse
AT nastevmiroslav mw54zagrebcroatiaearthquakeofmarch222020impactsandresponse