Cargando…
Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial
BACKGROUND: Methods to enhance the accuracy of the depression diagnosis continues to be of relevance to clinicians. The primary aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic precision of two different diagnostic strategies using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) as a referen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33962564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01432-w |
_version_ | 1783689680436330496 |
---|---|
author | Brinck-Claussen, Ursula Ødum Curth, Nadja Kehler Christensen, Kaj Sparle Davidsen, Annette Sofie Mikkelsen, John Hagel Lau, Marianne Engelbrecht Lundsteen, Merete Csillag, Claudio Hjorthøj, Carsten Nordentoft, Merete Eplov, Lene Falgaard |
author_facet | Brinck-Claussen, Ursula Ødum Curth, Nadja Kehler Christensen, Kaj Sparle Davidsen, Annette Sofie Mikkelsen, John Hagel Lau, Marianne Engelbrecht Lundsteen, Merete Csillag, Claudio Hjorthøj, Carsten Nordentoft, Merete Eplov, Lene Falgaard |
author_sort | Brinck-Claussen, Ursula Ødum |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Methods to enhance the accuracy of the depression diagnosis continues to be of relevance to clinicians. The primary aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic precision of two different diagnostic strategies using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) as a reference standard. A secondary aim was to evaluate accordance between depression severity found via MINI and mean Major Depression Inventory (MDI) sum-scores presented at referral. METHODS: This study was a two-armed, cluster-randomized superiority trial embedded in the Collabri trials investigating collaborative care in Danish general practices. GPs performing case-finding were instructed always to use MDI when suspecting depression. GPs performing usual clinical assessment were instructed to detect depression as they would normally do. According to guidelines, GPs would use MDI if they had a clinical suspicion, and patients responded positively to two or three core symptoms of depression. We compared the positive predictive value (PPV) in the two groups. RESULTS: Fifty-one GP clusters were randomized. In total, 244 participants were recruited in the case-finding group from a total of 19 GP clusters, and 256 participants were recruited in the usual clinical assessment group from a total of 19 GP clusters. The PPV of the GP diagnosis, when based on case-finding, was 0.83 (95% CI 0.78–0.88) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.89–0.96) when based on usual clinical assessment. The mean MDI sum-scores for each depression severity group indicated higher scores than suggested cut-offs. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, systematic use of MDI on clinical suspicion of depression did not improve the diagnostic precision compared with the usual clinical assessment of depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered on 07/02/2016 at ClinicalTrials.gov. No. NCT02678845. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01432-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8105936 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81059362021-05-10 Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial Brinck-Claussen, Ursula Ødum Curth, Nadja Kehler Christensen, Kaj Sparle Davidsen, Annette Sofie Mikkelsen, John Hagel Lau, Marianne Engelbrecht Lundsteen, Merete Csillag, Claudio Hjorthøj, Carsten Nordentoft, Merete Eplov, Lene Falgaard BMC Fam Pract Research BACKGROUND: Methods to enhance the accuracy of the depression diagnosis continues to be of relevance to clinicians. The primary aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic precision of two different diagnostic strategies using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) as a reference standard. A secondary aim was to evaluate accordance between depression severity found via MINI and mean Major Depression Inventory (MDI) sum-scores presented at referral. METHODS: This study was a two-armed, cluster-randomized superiority trial embedded in the Collabri trials investigating collaborative care in Danish general practices. GPs performing case-finding were instructed always to use MDI when suspecting depression. GPs performing usual clinical assessment were instructed to detect depression as they would normally do. According to guidelines, GPs would use MDI if they had a clinical suspicion, and patients responded positively to two or three core symptoms of depression. We compared the positive predictive value (PPV) in the two groups. RESULTS: Fifty-one GP clusters were randomized. In total, 244 participants were recruited in the case-finding group from a total of 19 GP clusters, and 256 participants were recruited in the usual clinical assessment group from a total of 19 GP clusters. The PPV of the GP diagnosis, when based on case-finding, was 0.83 (95% CI 0.78–0.88) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.89–0.96) when based on usual clinical assessment. The mean MDI sum-scores for each depression severity group indicated higher scores than suggested cut-offs. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, systematic use of MDI on clinical suspicion of depression did not improve the diagnostic precision compared with the usual clinical assessment of depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered on 07/02/2016 at ClinicalTrials.gov. No. NCT02678845. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01432-w. BioMed Central 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8105936/ /pubmed/33962564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01432-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Brinck-Claussen, Ursula Ødum Curth, Nadja Kehler Christensen, Kaj Sparle Davidsen, Annette Sofie Mikkelsen, John Hagel Lau, Marianne Engelbrecht Lundsteen, Merete Csillag, Claudio Hjorthøj, Carsten Nordentoft, Merete Eplov, Lene Falgaard Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial |
title | Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial |
title_full | Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial |
title_short | Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial |
title_sort | improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33962564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01432-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brinckclaussenursulaødum improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial AT curthnadjakehler improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial AT christensenkajsparle improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial AT davidsenannettesofie improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial AT mikkelsenjohnhagel improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial AT laumarianneengelbrecht improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial AT lundsteenmerete improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial AT csillagclaudio improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial AT hjorthøjcarsten improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial AT nordentoftmerete improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial AT eplovlenefalgaard improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial |