Cargando…

Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Methods to enhance the accuracy of the depression diagnosis continues to be of relevance to clinicians. The primary aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic precision of two different diagnostic strategies using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) as a referen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brinck-Claussen, Ursula Ødum, Curth, Nadja Kehler, Christensen, Kaj Sparle, Davidsen, Annette Sofie, Mikkelsen, John Hagel, Lau, Marianne Engelbrecht, Lundsteen, Merete, Csillag, Claudio, Hjorthøj, Carsten, Nordentoft, Merete, Eplov, Lene Falgaard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33962564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01432-w
_version_ 1783689680436330496
author Brinck-Claussen, Ursula Ødum
Curth, Nadja Kehler
Christensen, Kaj Sparle
Davidsen, Annette Sofie
Mikkelsen, John Hagel
Lau, Marianne Engelbrecht
Lundsteen, Merete
Csillag, Claudio
Hjorthøj, Carsten
Nordentoft, Merete
Eplov, Lene Falgaard
author_facet Brinck-Claussen, Ursula Ødum
Curth, Nadja Kehler
Christensen, Kaj Sparle
Davidsen, Annette Sofie
Mikkelsen, John Hagel
Lau, Marianne Engelbrecht
Lundsteen, Merete
Csillag, Claudio
Hjorthøj, Carsten
Nordentoft, Merete
Eplov, Lene Falgaard
author_sort Brinck-Claussen, Ursula Ødum
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methods to enhance the accuracy of the depression diagnosis continues to be of relevance to clinicians. The primary aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic precision of two different diagnostic strategies using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) as a reference standard. A secondary aim was to evaluate accordance between depression severity found via MINI and mean Major Depression Inventory (MDI) sum-scores presented at referral. METHODS: This study was a two-armed, cluster-randomized superiority trial embedded in the Collabri trials investigating collaborative care in Danish general practices. GPs performing case-finding were instructed always to use MDI when suspecting depression. GPs performing usual clinical assessment were instructed to detect depression as they would normally do. According to guidelines, GPs would use MDI if they had a clinical suspicion, and patients responded positively to two or three core symptoms of depression. We compared the positive predictive value (PPV) in the two groups. RESULTS: Fifty-one GP clusters were randomized. In total, 244 participants were recruited in the case-finding group from a total of 19 GP clusters, and 256 participants were recruited in the usual clinical assessment group from a total of 19 GP clusters. The PPV of the GP diagnosis, when based on case-finding, was 0.83 (95% CI 0.78–0.88) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.89–0.96) when based on usual clinical assessment. The mean MDI sum-scores for each depression severity group indicated higher scores than suggested cut-offs. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, systematic use of MDI on clinical suspicion of depression did not improve the diagnostic precision compared with the usual clinical assessment of depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered on 07/02/2016 at ClinicalTrials.gov. No. NCT02678845. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01432-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8105936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81059362021-05-10 Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial Brinck-Claussen, Ursula Ødum Curth, Nadja Kehler Christensen, Kaj Sparle Davidsen, Annette Sofie Mikkelsen, John Hagel Lau, Marianne Engelbrecht Lundsteen, Merete Csillag, Claudio Hjorthøj, Carsten Nordentoft, Merete Eplov, Lene Falgaard BMC Fam Pract Research BACKGROUND: Methods to enhance the accuracy of the depression diagnosis continues to be of relevance to clinicians. The primary aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic precision of two different diagnostic strategies using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) as a reference standard. A secondary aim was to evaluate accordance between depression severity found via MINI and mean Major Depression Inventory (MDI) sum-scores presented at referral. METHODS: This study was a two-armed, cluster-randomized superiority trial embedded in the Collabri trials investigating collaborative care in Danish general practices. GPs performing case-finding were instructed always to use MDI when suspecting depression. GPs performing usual clinical assessment were instructed to detect depression as they would normally do. According to guidelines, GPs would use MDI if they had a clinical suspicion, and patients responded positively to two or three core symptoms of depression. We compared the positive predictive value (PPV) in the two groups. RESULTS: Fifty-one GP clusters were randomized. In total, 244 participants were recruited in the case-finding group from a total of 19 GP clusters, and 256 participants were recruited in the usual clinical assessment group from a total of 19 GP clusters. The PPV of the GP diagnosis, when based on case-finding, was 0.83 (95% CI 0.78–0.88) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.89–0.96) when based on usual clinical assessment. The mean MDI sum-scores for each depression severity group indicated higher scores than suggested cut-offs. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, systematic use of MDI on clinical suspicion of depression did not improve the diagnostic precision compared with the usual clinical assessment of depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered on 07/02/2016 at ClinicalTrials.gov. No. NCT02678845. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01432-w. BioMed Central 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8105936/ /pubmed/33962564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01432-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Brinck-Claussen, Ursula Ødum
Curth, Nadja Kehler
Christensen, Kaj Sparle
Davidsen, Annette Sofie
Mikkelsen, John Hagel
Lau, Marianne Engelbrecht
Lundsteen, Merete
Csillag, Claudio
Hjorthøj, Carsten
Nordentoft, Merete
Eplov, Lene Falgaard
Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial
title Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial
title_full Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial
title_fullStr Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial
title_short Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial
title_sort improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33962564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01432-w
work_keys_str_mv AT brinckclaussenursulaødum improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT curthnadjakehler improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT christensenkajsparle improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT davidsenannettesofie improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT mikkelsenjohnhagel improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT laumarianneengelbrecht improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT lundsteenmerete improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT csillagclaudio improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT hjorthøjcarsten improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT nordentoftmerete improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT eplovlenefalgaard improvingtheprecisionofdepressiondiagnosisingeneralpracticeaclusterrandomizedtrial