Cargando…

The cost of community research—recruiting community-dwelling participants to a feasibility primary care cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: To support a robust evidence base for the organisation and provision of community-delivered health services for older people, clinical trials need to be designed to account for community-based participant recruitment. There is currently little reported information available on the time a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harrison, Nicola, Brundle, Caroline, Heaven, Anne, Clegg, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8106218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33964964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05297-3
_version_ 1783689742147125248
author Harrison, Nicola
Brundle, Caroline
Heaven, Anne
Clegg, Andrew
author_facet Harrison, Nicola
Brundle, Caroline
Heaven, Anne
Clegg, Andrew
author_sort Harrison, Nicola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To support a robust evidence base for the organisation and provision of community-delivered health services for older people, clinical trials need to be designed to account for community-based participant recruitment. There is currently little reported information available on the time and cost of recruiting community-dwelling older people, which makes the completion of cost attribution documentation problematic when applying for research funding. MAIN BODY: We aimed to establish the amount of researcher time it takes to recruit community-dwelling older people to a feasibility primary care cluster randomised controlled trial, including collecting baseline data. The trial was part of a programme of work investigating an intervention to improve the quality of life for older people with frailty. Two researchers conducting home visits to recruit and collect baseline data from participants recorded the time spent on travelling to and from the visit, at the visit itself and any associated administration. The median total researcher activity time per visit was 148 min. We discuss the various elements of recruitment and data collection activity and the factors that impacted the length of time taken, including location, individuals’ capacity and cognition, hearing and visual impairment and the desire for social contact. CONCLUSION: Studies cannot reach their recruitment targets if they are unrealistically planned and resourced. We recommend that trials recruiting older people in the community allocate two and a half hours of researcher time per person, on average, for consent, baseline data collection, travel and administration. We acknowledge that a variety of different factors will mean that researcher activity will vary between different community-based trials. Our findings give a good starting point for timing calculations, and evidence on which to base the justification of research activity costings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Personalised care planning for older people with frailty ISRCTN12363970. 08/11/2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8106218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81062182021-05-10 The cost of community research—recruiting community-dwelling participants to a feasibility primary care cluster randomised controlled trial Harrison, Nicola Brundle, Caroline Heaven, Anne Clegg, Andrew Trials Commentary BACKGROUND: To support a robust evidence base for the organisation and provision of community-delivered health services for older people, clinical trials need to be designed to account for community-based participant recruitment. There is currently little reported information available on the time and cost of recruiting community-dwelling older people, which makes the completion of cost attribution documentation problematic when applying for research funding. MAIN BODY: We aimed to establish the amount of researcher time it takes to recruit community-dwelling older people to a feasibility primary care cluster randomised controlled trial, including collecting baseline data. The trial was part of a programme of work investigating an intervention to improve the quality of life for older people with frailty. Two researchers conducting home visits to recruit and collect baseline data from participants recorded the time spent on travelling to and from the visit, at the visit itself and any associated administration. The median total researcher activity time per visit was 148 min. We discuss the various elements of recruitment and data collection activity and the factors that impacted the length of time taken, including location, individuals’ capacity and cognition, hearing and visual impairment and the desire for social contact. CONCLUSION: Studies cannot reach their recruitment targets if they are unrealistically planned and resourced. We recommend that trials recruiting older people in the community allocate two and a half hours of researcher time per person, on average, for consent, baseline data collection, travel and administration. We acknowledge that a variety of different factors will mean that researcher activity will vary between different community-based trials. Our findings give a good starting point for timing calculations, and evidence on which to base the justification of research activity costings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Personalised care planning for older people with frailty ISRCTN12363970. 08/11/2018. BioMed Central 2021-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8106218/ /pubmed/33964964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05297-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Harrison, Nicola
Brundle, Caroline
Heaven, Anne
Clegg, Andrew
The cost of community research—recruiting community-dwelling participants to a feasibility primary care cluster randomised controlled trial
title The cost of community research—recruiting community-dwelling participants to a feasibility primary care cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full The cost of community research—recruiting community-dwelling participants to a feasibility primary care cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The cost of community research—recruiting community-dwelling participants to a feasibility primary care cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The cost of community research—recruiting community-dwelling participants to a feasibility primary care cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short The cost of community research—recruiting community-dwelling participants to a feasibility primary care cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort cost of community research—recruiting community-dwelling participants to a feasibility primary care cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8106218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33964964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05297-3
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisonnicola thecostofcommunityresearchrecruitingcommunitydwellingparticipantstoafeasibilityprimarycareclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brundlecaroline thecostofcommunityresearchrecruitingcommunitydwellingparticipantstoafeasibilityprimarycareclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT heavenanne thecostofcommunityresearchrecruitingcommunitydwellingparticipantstoafeasibilityprimarycareclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cleggandrew thecostofcommunityresearchrecruitingcommunitydwellingparticipantstoafeasibilityprimarycareclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT harrisonnicola costofcommunityresearchrecruitingcommunitydwellingparticipantstoafeasibilityprimarycareclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brundlecaroline costofcommunityresearchrecruitingcommunitydwellingparticipantstoafeasibilityprimarycareclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT heavenanne costofcommunityresearchrecruitingcommunitydwellingparticipantstoafeasibilityprimarycareclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cleggandrew costofcommunityresearchrecruitingcommunitydwellingparticipantstoafeasibilityprimarycareclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial