Cargando…

Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 31 patients with soft-tissue injury or fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esmailian, Mehrdad, Ataie, Mahdi, Ahmadi, Omid, Rastegar, Shirvan, Adibi, Atoosa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8106407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084193
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jrms.JRMS_264_20
_version_ 1783689770885447680
author Esmailian, Mehrdad
Ataie, Mahdi
Ahmadi, Omid
Rastegar, Shirvan
Adibi, Atoosa
author_facet Esmailian, Mehrdad
Ataie, Mahdi
Ahmadi, Omid
Rastegar, Shirvan
Adibi, Atoosa
author_sort Esmailian, Mehrdad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 31 patients with soft-tissue injury or fracture, referring to the MRI imaging center of Alzahra and Kashani Hospitals in Isfahan from October 2018 to March 2019. After an MRI, an ultrasound of the affected ankle was performed for all patients. Sonography and MRI were performed by two radiologists who were blinded to the results of each other's reports. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of sonography were determined. RESULTS: In this study, 31 patients with ankle trauma were studied. The mean age of the patients was 30.73 ± 10.15 years; 32.3% were male and 67.7% were female. The sensitivity of ultrasound relative to MRI to detect damage to the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), posterior talofibular ligament (PTFL), and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) was 66.67%, 50%, and 100%, respectively, and the corresponding specificity was 92.86%, 93.10%, and 93.10%, respectively. According to Kappa test, the agreement between ultrasound and MRI methods for detecting injury to ATFL (κ = 0.51), PTFL (κ = 0.35), and CFL (κ= 0.63) was statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound is an appropriate modality for the diagnosis of injuries to CFL and ATFL and has shown acceptable results for PTFL. It could be used as an alternative in cases where access to MRI is not available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8106407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81064072021-06-02 Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury Esmailian, Mehrdad Ataie, Mahdi Ahmadi, Omid Rastegar, Shirvan Adibi, Atoosa J Res Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 31 patients with soft-tissue injury or fracture, referring to the MRI imaging center of Alzahra and Kashani Hospitals in Isfahan from October 2018 to March 2019. After an MRI, an ultrasound of the affected ankle was performed for all patients. Sonography and MRI were performed by two radiologists who were blinded to the results of each other's reports. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of sonography were determined. RESULTS: In this study, 31 patients with ankle trauma were studied. The mean age of the patients was 30.73 ± 10.15 years; 32.3% were male and 67.7% were female. The sensitivity of ultrasound relative to MRI to detect damage to the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), posterior talofibular ligament (PTFL), and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) was 66.67%, 50%, and 100%, respectively, and the corresponding specificity was 92.86%, 93.10%, and 93.10%, respectively. According to Kappa test, the agreement between ultrasound and MRI methods for detecting injury to ATFL (κ = 0.51), PTFL (κ = 0.35), and CFL (κ= 0.63) was statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound is an appropriate modality for the diagnosis of injuries to CFL and ATFL and has shown acceptable results for PTFL. It could be used as an alternative in cases where access to MRI is not available. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8106407/ /pubmed/34084193 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jrms.JRMS_264_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Research in Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Esmailian, Mehrdad
Ataie, Mahdi
Ahmadi, Omid
Rastegar, Shirvan
Adibi, Atoosa
Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury
title Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury
title_full Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury
title_fullStr Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury
title_short Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury
title_sort sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8106407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084193
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jrms.JRMS_264_20
work_keys_str_mv AT esmailianmehrdad sensitivityandspecificityofultrasoundinthediagnosisoftraumaticankleinjury
AT ataiemahdi sensitivityandspecificityofultrasoundinthediagnosisoftraumaticankleinjury
AT ahmadiomid sensitivityandspecificityofultrasoundinthediagnosisoftraumaticankleinjury
AT rastegarshirvan sensitivityandspecificityofultrasoundinthediagnosisoftraumaticankleinjury
AT adibiatoosa sensitivityandspecificityofultrasoundinthediagnosisoftraumaticankleinjury