Cargando…

Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review

PURPOSE: The reported conversion rates for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) range widely from 2 to 38%. The identification of risk factors for conversion may help surgeons during preoperative planning and patient counseling. Moreover, the impact of conversion on outcomes of MIDP is un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balduzzi, A., van der Heijde, N., Alseidi, A., Dokmak, S., Kendrick, M. L., Polanco, P. M., Sandford, D. E., Shrikhande, S. V., Vollmer, C. M., Wang, S. E., Zeh, H. J., Hilal, M. Abu, Asbun, H. J., Besselink, M. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8106568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33301071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02043-2
_version_ 1783689804998770688
author Balduzzi, A.
van der Heijde, N.
Alseidi, A.
Dokmak, S.
Kendrick, M. L.
Polanco, P. M.
Sandford, D. E.
Shrikhande, S. V.
Vollmer, C. M.
Wang, S. E.
Zeh, H. J.
Hilal, M. Abu
Asbun, H. J.
Besselink, M. G.
author_facet Balduzzi, A.
van der Heijde, N.
Alseidi, A.
Dokmak, S.
Kendrick, M. L.
Polanco, P. M.
Sandford, D. E.
Shrikhande, S. V.
Vollmer, C. M.
Wang, S. E.
Zeh, H. J.
Hilal, M. Abu
Asbun, H. J.
Besselink, M. G.
author_sort Balduzzi, A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The reported conversion rates for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) range widely from 2 to 38%. The identification of risk factors for conversion may help surgeons during preoperative planning and patient counseling. Moreover, the impact of conversion on outcomes of MIDP is unknown. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted as part of the 2019 Miami International Evidence-Based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection (IG-MIPR). The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched for studies concerning conversion to open surgery in MIDP. RESULTS: Of the 828 studies screened, eight met the eligibility criteria, resulting in a combined dataset including 2592 patients after MIDP. The overall conversion rate was 17.1% (range 13.0–32.7%) with heterogeneity between studies associated with the definition of conversion adopted. Only one study divided conversion into elective and emergency conversion. The main indications for conversion were vascular involvement (23.7%), concern for oncological radicality (21.9%), and bleeding (18.9%). The reported risk factors for conversion included a malignancy as an indication for surgery, the proximity of the tumor to vascular structures in preoperative imaging, higher BMI or visceral fat, and multi-organ resection or extended resection. Contrasting results were seen in terms of blood loss and length of stay in comparing converted MIDP and completed MIDP patients. CONCLUSION: The identified risk factors for conversion from this study can be used for patient selection and counseling. Surgeon experience should be considered when contemplating MIDP for a complex patient. Future studies should divide conversion into elective and emergency conversion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8106568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81065682021-05-24 Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review Balduzzi, A. van der Heijde, N. Alseidi, A. Dokmak, S. Kendrick, M. L. Polanco, P. M. Sandford, D. E. Shrikhande, S. V. Vollmer, C. M. Wang, S. E. Zeh, H. J. Hilal, M. Abu Asbun, H. J. Besselink, M. G. Langenbecks Arch Surg Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses PURPOSE: The reported conversion rates for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) range widely from 2 to 38%. The identification of risk factors for conversion may help surgeons during preoperative planning and patient counseling. Moreover, the impact of conversion on outcomes of MIDP is unknown. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted as part of the 2019 Miami International Evidence-Based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection (IG-MIPR). The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched for studies concerning conversion to open surgery in MIDP. RESULTS: Of the 828 studies screened, eight met the eligibility criteria, resulting in a combined dataset including 2592 patients after MIDP. The overall conversion rate was 17.1% (range 13.0–32.7%) with heterogeneity between studies associated with the definition of conversion adopted. Only one study divided conversion into elective and emergency conversion. The main indications for conversion were vascular involvement (23.7%), concern for oncological radicality (21.9%), and bleeding (18.9%). The reported risk factors for conversion included a malignancy as an indication for surgery, the proximity of the tumor to vascular structures in preoperative imaging, higher BMI or visceral fat, and multi-organ resection or extended resection. Contrasting results were seen in terms of blood loss and length of stay in comparing converted MIDP and completed MIDP patients. CONCLUSION: The identified risk factors for conversion from this study can be used for patient selection and counseling. Surgeon experience should be considered when contemplating MIDP for a complex patient. Future studies should divide conversion into elective and emergency conversion. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-12-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8106568/ /pubmed/33301071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02043-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Balduzzi, A.
van der Heijde, N.
Alseidi, A.
Dokmak, S.
Kendrick, M. L.
Polanco, P. M.
Sandford, D. E.
Shrikhande, S. V.
Vollmer, C. M.
Wang, S. E.
Zeh, H. J.
Hilal, M. Abu
Asbun, H. J.
Besselink, M. G.
Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review
title Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review
title_full Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review
title_fullStr Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review
title_short Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review
title_sort risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review
topic Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8106568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33301071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02043-2
work_keys_str_mv AT balduzzia riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview
AT vanderheijden riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview
AT alseidia riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview
AT dokmaks riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview
AT kendrickml riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview
AT polancopm riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview
AT sandfordde riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview
AT shrikhandesv riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview
AT vollmercm riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview
AT wangse riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview
AT zehhj riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview
AT hilalmabu riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview
AT asbunhj riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview
AT besselinkmg riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview
AT riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview