Cargando…
Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review
PURPOSE: The reported conversion rates for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) range widely from 2 to 38%. The identification of risk factors for conversion may help surgeons during preoperative planning and patient counseling. Moreover, the impact of conversion on outcomes of MIDP is un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8106568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33301071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02043-2 |
_version_ | 1783689804998770688 |
---|---|
author | Balduzzi, A. van der Heijde, N. Alseidi, A. Dokmak, S. Kendrick, M. L. Polanco, P. M. Sandford, D. E. Shrikhande, S. V. Vollmer, C. M. Wang, S. E. Zeh, H. J. Hilal, M. Abu Asbun, H. J. Besselink, M. G. |
author_facet | Balduzzi, A. van der Heijde, N. Alseidi, A. Dokmak, S. Kendrick, M. L. Polanco, P. M. Sandford, D. E. Shrikhande, S. V. Vollmer, C. M. Wang, S. E. Zeh, H. J. Hilal, M. Abu Asbun, H. J. Besselink, M. G. |
author_sort | Balduzzi, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The reported conversion rates for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) range widely from 2 to 38%. The identification of risk factors for conversion may help surgeons during preoperative planning and patient counseling. Moreover, the impact of conversion on outcomes of MIDP is unknown. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted as part of the 2019 Miami International Evidence-Based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection (IG-MIPR). The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched for studies concerning conversion to open surgery in MIDP. RESULTS: Of the 828 studies screened, eight met the eligibility criteria, resulting in a combined dataset including 2592 patients after MIDP. The overall conversion rate was 17.1% (range 13.0–32.7%) with heterogeneity between studies associated with the definition of conversion adopted. Only one study divided conversion into elective and emergency conversion. The main indications for conversion were vascular involvement (23.7%), concern for oncological radicality (21.9%), and bleeding (18.9%). The reported risk factors for conversion included a malignancy as an indication for surgery, the proximity of the tumor to vascular structures in preoperative imaging, higher BMI or visceral fat, and multi-organ resection or extended resection. Contrasting results were seen in terms of blood loss and length of stay in comparing converted MIDP and completed MIDP patients. CONCLUSION: The identified risk factors for conversion from this study can be used for patient selection and counseling. Surgeon experience should be considered when contemplating MIDP for a complex patient. Future studies should divide conversion into elective and emergency conversion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8106568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81065682021-05-24 Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review Balduzzi, A. van der Heijde, N. Alseidi, A. Dokmak, S. Kendrick, M. L. Polanco, P. M. Sandford, D. E. Shrikhande, S. V. Vollmer, C. M. Wang, S. E. Zeh, H. J. Hilal, M. Abu Asbun, H. J. Besselink, M. G. Langenbecks Arch Surg Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses PURPOSE: The reported conversion rates for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) range widely from 2 to 38%. The identification of risk factors for conversion may help surgeons during preoperative planning and patient counseling. Moreover, the impact of conversion on outcomes of MIDP is unknown. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted as part of the 2019 Miami International Evidence-Based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection (IG-MIPR). The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched for studies concerning conversion to open surgery in MIDP. RESULTS: Of the 828 studies screened, eight met the eligibility criteria, resulting in a combined dataset including 2592 patients after MIDP. The overall conversion rate was 17.1% (range 13.0–32.7%) with heterogeneity between studies associated with the definition of conversion adopted. Only one study divided conversion into elective and emergency conversion. The main indications for conversion were vascular involvement (23.7%), concern for oncological radicality (21.9%), and bleeding (18.9%). The reported risk factors for conversion included a malignancy as an indication for surgery, the proximity of the tumor to vascular structures in preoperative imaging, higher BMI or visceral fat, and multi-organ resection or extended resection. Contrasting results were seen in terms of blood loss and length of stay in comparing converted MIDP and completed MIDP patients. CONCLUSION: The identified risk factors for conversion from this study can be used for patient selection and counseling. Surgeon experience should be considered when contemplating MIDP for a complex patient. Future studies should divide conversion into elective and emergency conversion. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-12-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8106568/ /pubmed/33301071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02043-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Balduzzi, A. van der Heijde, N. Alseidi, A. Dokmak, S. Kendrick, M. L. Polanco, P. M. Sandford, D. E. Shrikhande, S. V. Vollmer, C. M. Wang, S. E. Zeh, H. J. Hilal, M. Abu Asbun, H. J. Besselink, M. G. Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review |
title | Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review |
title_full | Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review |
title_short | Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review |
title_sort | risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8106568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33301071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02043-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balduzzia riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview AT vanderheijden riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview AT alseidia riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview AT dokmaks riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview AT kendrickml riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview AT polancopm riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview AT sandfordde riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview AT shrikhandesv riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview AT vollmercm riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview AT wangse riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview AT zehhj riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview AT hilalmabu riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview AT asbunhj riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview AT besselinkmg riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview AT riskfactorsandoutcomesofconversioninminimallyinvasivedistalpancreatectomyasystematicreview |