Cargando…

Sagittal, rotational and transverse changes with three intraoral distalization force systems: Jones jig, distal jet and first class

BACKGROUND: To compare the maxillary dentoalveolar changes of patients treated with three distalization force systems: Jones Jig, Distal Jet and First Class appliances, using digitized models. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective sample comprised 118 digitized models of 59 patients with Class II...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bellini-Pereira, Silvio-Augusto, Aliaga-Del Castillo, Aron, Vilanova, Lorena, Patel, Mayara-Paim, Reis, Rachelle-Simões, Grec, Roberto-Henrique-da Costa, Henriques, José-Fernando-Castanha, Janson, Guilherme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8106932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981392
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57993
_version_ 1783689860400283648
author Bellini-Pereira, Silvio-Augusto
Aliaga-Del Castillo, Aron
Vilanova, Lorena
Patel, Mayara-Paim
Reis, Rachelle-Simões
Grec, Roberto-Henrique-da Costa
Henriques, José-Fernando-Castanha
Janson, Guilherme
author_facet Bellini-Pereira, Silvio-Augusto
Aliaga-Del Castillo, Aron
Vilanova, Lorena
Patel, Mayara-Paim
Reis, Rachelle-Simões
Grec, Roberto-Henrique-da Costa
Henriques, José-Fernando-Castanha
Janson, Guilherme
author_sort Bellini-Pereira, Silvio-Augusto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the maxillary dentoalveolar changes of patients treated with three distalization force systems: Jones Jig, Distal Jet and First Class appliances, using digitized models. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective sample comprised 118 digitized models of 59 patients with Class II malocclusion divided into three groups: Group 1 consisted of 22 patients treated with the Jones Jig appliance; Group 2 consisted of 20 patients treated with the Distal Jet, and Group 3 comprised 17 patients treated with the First Class appliance. Pretreatment and post-distalization plaster models of all patients were digitized and evaluated with OrthoAnalyzerTM software. The pretreatment and post-distalization variables regarding sagittal, rotational and transverse changes were compared by the One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis tests, depending on normality. RESULTS: All appliances presented similar amounts of distalization. The Distal Jet appliance promoted significantly smaller mesial displacement of premolars and greater expansion of posterior teeth. The First Class presented the smallest rotation of the maxillary molars and treatment time. CONCLUSIONS: The distalizers were effective in correcting Class II molar relationship, however, a palatal force seems to provide fewer undesirable effects. Additionally, the degree of rotation and expansion was associated with the side of force application. Key words:Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Orthodontics, Corrective, Distalizers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8106932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81069322021-05-11 Sagittal, rotational and transverse changes with three intraoral distalization force systems: Jones jig, distal jet and first class Bellini-Pereira, Silvio-Augusto Aliaga-Del Castillo, Aron Vilanova, Lorena Patel, Mayara-Paim Reis, Rachelle-Simões Grec, Roberto-Henrique-da Costa Henriques, José-Fernando-Castanha Janson, Guilherme J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: To compare the maxillary dentoalveolar changes of patients treated with three distalization force systems: Jones Jig, Distal Jet and First Class appliances, using digitized models. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective sample comprised 118 digitized models of 59 patients with Class II malocclusion divided into three groups: Group 1 consisted of 22 patients treated with the Jones Jig appliance; Group 2 consisted of 20 patients treated with the Distal Jet, and Group 3 comprised 17 patients treated with the First Class appliance. Pretreatment and post-distalization plaster models of all patients were digitized and evaluated with OrthoAnalyzerTM software. The pretreatment and post-distalization variables regarding sagittal, rotational and transverse changes were compared by the One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis tests, depending on normality. RESULTS: All appliances presented similar amounts of distalization. The Distal Jet appliance promoted significantly smaller mesial displacement of premolars and greater expansion of posterior teeth. The First Class presented the smallest rotation of the maxillary molars and treatment time. CONCLUSIONS: The distalizers were effective in correcting Class II molar relationship, however, a palatal force seems to provide fewer undesirable effects. Additionally, the degree of rotation and expansion was associated with the side of force application. Key words:Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Orthodontics, Corrective, Distalizers. Medicina Oral S.L. 2021-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8106932/ /pubmed/33981392 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57993 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Bellini-Pereira, Silvio-Augusto
Aliaga-Del Castillo, Aron
Vilanova, Lorena
Patel, Mayara-Paim
Reis, Rachelle-Simões
Grec, Roberto-Henrique-da Costa
Henriques, José-Fernando-Castanha
Janson, Guilherme
Sagittal, rotational and transverse changes with three intraoral distalization force systems: Jones jig, distal jet and first class
title Sagittal, rotational and transverse changes with three intraoral distalization force systems: Jones jig, distal jet and first class
title_full Sagittal, rotational and transverse changes with three intraoral distalization force systems: Jones jig, distal jet and first class
title_fullStr Sagittal, rotational and transverse changes with three intraoral distalization force systems: Jones jig, distal jet and first class
title_full_unstemmed Sagittal, rotational and transverse changes with three intraoral distalization force systems: Jones jig, distal jet and first class
title_short Sagittal, rotational and transverse changes with three intraoral distalization force systems: Jones jig, distal jet and first class
title_sort sagittal, rotational and transverse changes with three intraoral distalization force systems: jones jig, distal jet and first class
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8106932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981392
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57993
work_keys_str_mv AT bellinipereirasilvioaugusto sagittalrotationalandtransversechangeswiththreeintraoraldistalizationforcesystemsjonesjigdistaljetandfirstclass
AT aliagadelcastilloaron sagittalrotationalandtransversechangeswiththreeintraoraldistalizationforcesystemsjonesjigdistaljetandfirstclass
AT vilanovalorena sagittalrotationalandtransversechangeswiththreeintraoraldistalizationforcesystemsjonesjigdistaljetandfirstclass
AT patelmayarapaim sagittalrotationalandtransversechangeswiththreeintraoraldistalizationforcesystemsjonesjigdistaljetandfirstclass
AT reisrachellesimoes sagittalrotationalandtransversechangeswiththreeintraoraldistalizationforcesystemsjonesjigdistaljetandfirstclass
AT grecrobertohenriquedacosta sagittalrotationalandtransversechangeswiththreeintraoraldistalizationforcesystemsjonesjigdistaljetandfirstclass
AT henriquesjosefernandocastanha sagittalrotationalandtransversechangeswiththreeintraoraldistalizationforcesystemsjonesjigdistaljetandfirstclass
AT jansonguilherme sagittalrotationalandtransversechangeswiththreeintraoraldistalizationforcesystemsjonesjigdistaljetandfirstclass