Cargando…

Repeat Epidural Injections of SP-102 (Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate Injectable Gel) in Subjects with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy

PURPOSE: SP-102 is a novel epidural steroid injection (ESI) formulation of 10 mg dexamethasone sodium phosphate in a viscous gel solution. Repeat dosing of ESIs is possible if required for pain relief, but with consideration of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis suppression from prolonged sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radnovich, Richard, Heinz, Jill, Ambrose, Chris, Stannard, Elizabeth, Lissin, Dmitri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981160
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S303282
_version_ 1783689884434694144
author Radnovich, Richard
Heinz, Jill
Ambrose, Chris
Stannard, Elizabeth
Lissin, Dmitri
author_facet Radnovich, Richard
Heinz, Jill
Ambrose, Chris
Stannard, Elizabeth
Lissin, Dmitri
author_sort Radnovich, Richard
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: SP-102 is a novel epidural steroid injection (ESI) formulation of 10 mg dexamethasone sodium phosphate in a viscous gel solution. Repeat dosing of ESIs is possible if required for pain relief, but with consideration of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis suppression from prolonged systemic exposure. This phase I/II study investigated the effect of initial and repeat SP-102 injections on HPA suppression and analgesia. METHODS: Subjects with lumbosacral radiculopathy received an initial epidural SP-102 injection (T1) on day 1, followed by a repeat injection (T2) on ≥28 days later. To determine HPA suppression, area under the effect curve over 28 days and maximum change from baseline were calculated for cortisol, glucose levels, and white blood cell (WBC) count. Equivalent effect on HPA suppression of T1 relative to T2 was determined if the 90% CIs for ratios of these measures were within 80%–125%. The effect of repeat injections on leg and back pain was also assessed. RESULTS: Based on the responder analysis, all subjects had achieved a cortisol response by day 3 after initial injection and by day 2 after repeat injection. The repeat injection had similar effects on glucose levels and WBC count to the initial injection. Pain scores decreased after each injection and remained low for the 28-day follow-up, with some evidence of improved analgesic effect of the second dose compared with the first. There were no serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: The lack of cumulative effect and rapid resolution of HPA suppression following repeated SP-102 dosing suggests that consideration of HPA pharmacodynamics is not clinically relevant when making decisions regarding repeat dosing. SP-102 ESIs provided prolonged pain relief, with preliminary evidence of greater efficacy after repeat injection. A phase III trial is ongoing. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03613662.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8107054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81070542021-05-11 Repeat Epidural Injections of SP-102 (Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate Injectable Gel) in Subjects with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Radnovich, Richard Heinz, Jill Ambrose, Chris Stannard, Elizabeth Lissin, Dmitri J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: SP-102 is a novel epidural steroid injection (ESI) formulation of 10 mg dexamethasone sodium phosphate in a viscous gel solution. Repeat dosing of ESIs is possible if required for pain relief, but with consideration of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis suppression from prolonged systemic exposure. This phase I/II study investigated the effect of initial and repeat SP-102 injections on HPA suppression and analgesia. METHODS: Subjects with lumbosacral radiculopathy received an initial epidural SP-102 injection (T1) on day 1, followed by a repeat injection (T2) on ≥28 days later. To determine HPA suppression, area under the effect curve over 28 days and maximum change from baseline were calculated for cortisol, glucose levels, and white blood cell (WBC) count. Equivalent effect on HPA suppression of T1 relative to T2 was determined if the 90% CIs for ratios of these measures were within 80%–125%. The effect of repeat injections on leg and back pain was also assessed. RESULTS: Based on the responder analysis, all subjects had achieved a cortisol response by day 3 after initial injection and by day 2 after repeat injection. The repeat injection had similar effects on glucose levels and WBC count to the initial injection. Pain scores decreased after each injection and remained low for the 28-day follow-up, with some evidence of improved analgesic effect of the second dose compared with the first. There were no serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: The lack of cumulative effect and rapid resolution of HPA suppression following repeated SP-102 dosing suggests that consideration of HPA pharmacodynamics is not clinically relevant when making decisions regarding repeat dosing. SP-102 ESIs provided prolonged pain relief, with preliminary evidence of greater efficacy after repeat injection. A phase III trial is ongoing. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03613662. Dove 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8107054/ /pubmed/33981160 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S303282 Text en © 2021 Radnovich et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Radnovich, Richard
Heinz, Jill
Ambrose, Chris
Stannard, Elizabeth
Lissin, Dmitri
Repeat Epidural Injections of SP-102 (Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate Injectable Gel) in Subjects with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
title Repeat Epidural Injections of SP-102 (Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate Injectable Gel) in Subjects with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
title_full Repeat Epidural Injections of SP-102 (Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate Injectable Gel) in Subjects with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
title_fullStr Repeat Epidural Injections of SP-102 (Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate Injectable Gel) in Subjects with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
title_full_unstemmed Repeat Epidural Injections of SP-102 (Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate Injectable Gel) in Subjects with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
title_short Repeat Epidural Injections of SP-102 (Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate Injectable Gel) in Subjects with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
title_sort repeat epidural injections of sp-102 (dexamethasone sodium phosphate injectable gel) in subjects with lumbosacral radiculopathy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981160
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S303282
work_keys_str_mv AT radnovichrichard repeatepiduralinjectionsofsp102dexamethasonesodiumphosphateinjectablegelinsubjectswithlumbosacralradiculopathy
AT heinzjill repeatepiduralinjectionsofsp102dexamethasonesodiumphosphateinjectablegelinsubjectswithlumbosacralradiculopathy
AT ambrosechris repeatepiduralinjectionsofsp102dexamethasonesodiumphosphateinjectablegelinsubjectswithlumbosacralradiculopathy
AT stannardelizabeth repeatepiduralinjectionsofsp102dexamethasonesodiumphosphateinjectablegelinsubjectswithlumbosacralradiculopathy
AT lissindmitri repeatepiduralinjectionsofsp102dexamethasonesodiumphosphateinjectablegelinsubjectswithlumbosacralradiculopathy