Cargando…

Comparison of the Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Follicular Protocol with the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of long-acting GnRH agonist follicular and GnRH antagonist protocols among women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) using data published in both English-language and Chinese studies. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Rui, Guan, Yichun, Perrot, Valerie, Ma, Juan, Li, Rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33651282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01612-7
_version_ 1783689888926793728
author Yang, Rui
Guan, Yichun
Perrot, Valerie
Ma, Juan
Li, Rong
author_facet Yang, Rui
Guan, Yichun
Perrot, Valerie
Ma, Juan
Li, Rong
author_sort Yang, Rui
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of long-acting GnRH agonist follicular and GnRH antagonist protocols among women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) using data published in both English-language and Chinese studies. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, and Wanfang databases up to March 2019 for studies comparing long-acting GnRH agonist follicular and GnRH antagonist protocols in women undergoing IVF. The primary outcome was live birth rate; secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate; safety outcomes were ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and miscarriage rate in fresh cycle. Statistical analysis was done using R software. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019139396). RESULTS: In 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 1994 women belonged to the long-acting GnRH agonist follicular protocol group and 1678 to the GnRH antagonist protocol group. Live birth rate (relative risk (RR) 1.61; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27, 2.05; P < 0.001), clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.44; 95% CI 1.32, 1.58; P < 0.001), and implantation rate (RR 1.58; 95% CI 1.44, 1.73; P = 0.001) were higher in the long-acting GnRH agonist follicular protocol compared with the antagonist protocol group. There was no difference in miscarriage rate (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.58, 1.64; P = 0.98) between the long-acting GnRH agonist follicular and antagonist protocols. However, OHSS rate (RR 1.63; 95% CI 1.15, 2.32; P = 0.0058) was lower in the GnRH antagonist protocol compared to the long-acting GnRH agonist protocol group. CONCLUSION: The long-acting GnRH agonist follicular protocol was beneficial in improving live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and implantation rate whereas the incidence of OHSS was significantly lower in women undergoing the GnRH antagonist protocol. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-020-01612-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8107074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81070742021-05-24 Comparison of the Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Follicular Protocol with the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Yang, Rui Guan, Yichun Perrot, Valerie Ma, Juan Li, Rong Adv Ther Review INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of long-acting GnRH agonist follicular and GnRH antagonist protocols among women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) using data published in both English-language and Chinese studies. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, and Wanfang databases up to March 2019 for studies comparing long-acting GnRH agonist follicular and GnRH antagonist protocols in women undergoing IVF. The primary outcome was live birth rate; secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate; safety outcomes were ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and miscarriage rate in fresh cycle. Statistical analysis was done using R software. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019139396). RESULTS: In 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 1994 women belonged to the long-acting GnRH agonist follicular protocol group and 1678 to the GnRH antagonist protocol group. Live birth rate (relative risk (RR) 1.61; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27, 2.05; P < 0.001), clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.44; 95% CI 1.32, 1.58; P < 0.001), and implantation rate (RR 1.58; 95% CI 1.44, 1.73; P = 0.001) were higher in the long-acting GnRH agonist follicular protocol compared with the antagonist protocol group. There was no difference in miscarriage rate (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.58, 1.64; P = 0.98) between the long-acting GnRH agonist follicular and antagonist protocols. However, OHSS rate (RR 1.63; 95% CI 1.15, 2.32; P = 0.0058) was lower in the GnRH antagonist protocol compared to the long-acting GnRH agonist protocol group. CONCLUSION: The long-acting GnRH agonist follicular protocol was beneficial in improving live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and implantation rate whereas the incidence of OHSS was significantly lower in women undergoing the GnRH antagonist protocol. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-020-01612-7. Springer Healthcare 2021-03-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8107074/ /pubmed/33651282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01612-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Yang, Rui
Guan, Yichun
Perrot, Valerie
Ma, Juan
Li, Rong
Comparison of the Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Follicular Protocol with the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Comparison of the Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Follicular Protocol with the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of the Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Follicular Protocol with the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of the Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Follicular Protocol with the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Follicular Protocol with the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of the Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Follicular Protocol with the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of the long-acting gnrh agonist follicular protocol with the gnrh antagonist protocol in women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33651282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01612-7
work_keys_str_mv AT yangrui comparisonofthelongactinggnrhagonistfollicularprotocolwiththegnrhantagonistprotocolinwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guanyichun comparisonofthelongactinggnrhagonistfollicularprotocolwiththegnrhantagonistprotocolinwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT perrotvalerie comparisonofthelongactinggnrhagonistfollicularprotocolwiththegnrhantagonistprotocolinwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT majuan comparisonofthelongactinggnrhagonistfollicularprotocolwiththegnrhantagonistprotocolinwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lirong comparisonofthelongactinggnrhagonistfollicularprotocolwiththegnrhantagonistprotocolinwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis