Cargando…

Early Adverse Stress and Depressive and Bipolar Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Treatment Interventions

Introduction: A significant proportion of adults with depressive or bipolar disorders exposed to early adverse stressors do not adequately respond to standard treatments. This review aimed at synthesizing the evidence on the effectiveness of treatment interventions for depressive or bipolar disorder...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martínez, Pablo, Gloger, Sergio, Diez de Medina, Dante, González, Arantza, Carrasco, María I., Schilling, Sara, Vöhringer, Paul A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981259
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650706
_version_ 1783689923886317568
author Martínez, Pablo
Gloger, Sergio
Diez de Medina, Dante
González, Arantza
Carrasco, María I.
Schilling, Sara
Vöhringer, Paul A.
author_facet Martínez, Pablo
Gloger, Sergio
Diez de Medina, Dante
González, Arantza
Carrasco, María I.
Schilling, Sara
Vöhringer, Paul A.
author_sort Martínez, Pablo
collection PubMed
description Introduction: A significant proportion of adults with depressive or bipolar disorders exposed to early adverse stressors do not adequately respond to standard treatments. This review aimed at synthesizing the evidence on the effectiveness of treatment interventions for depressive or bipolar disorders in adult individuals (aged 18 years or more) exposed to adverse stress early in life. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis including experimental and quasi-experimental published studies indexed in CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases and/or in reference lists. Data management and critical appraisal (with the Study Quality Assessment Tools) was conducted independently by multiple researchers. A quality-effects model for meta-analysis was used for data synthesis and publication bias was assessed using the Doi plot and LFK index. The main outcome was short-term reductions in depressive symptoms. Results: Eight randomized controlled trials, three controlled before-and-after (pre-post) studies, and three uncontrolled before-and-after studies were included. Studies lacked bipolar disorder patients. Unclear randomization procedures and reporting of blinded outcome assessor, and limited use of intention-to-treat analysis, were relevant potential sources of bias. Meta-analyses indicated that psychological, pharmacological, and combined interventions were effective in reducing depressive symptoms in the short- (Cohen's d = −0.55, 95% CI −0.75 to −0.36, I(2) = 0%) and mid-term (Cohen's d = −0.66, 95% CI −1.07 to −0.25, I(2) = 65.0%). However, a high risk of publication bias was detected for these outcomes. A small number of studies, with mixed results, reported interventions with long-term improvements in depressive symptomatology, and short- and mid-term response to treatment and remission. Conclusion: Despite the well-documented long-lasting, negative, and costly impact of early adverse stressors on adult psychopathology, evidence on treatment alternatives remains scant. Trauma-focused treatment interventions—whether psychological interventions alone or in combination with pharmacotherapy—may have the potential to reduce the severity of depressive symptom in adults who were exposed to early adverse stress. Findings must be interpreted with considerable caution, as important study and outcome-level limitations were observed and gray literature was not considered in this systematic review and meta-analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8107272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81072722021-05-11 Early Adverse Stress and Depressive and Bipolar Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Treatment Interventions Martínez, Pablo Gloger, Sergio Diez de Medina, Dante González, Arantza Carrasco, María I. Schilling, Sara Vöhringer, Paul A. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Introduction: A significant proportion of adults with depressive or bipolar disorders exposed to early adverse stressors do not adequately respond to standard treatments. This review aimed at synthesizing the evidence on the effectiveness of treatment interventions for depressive or bipolar disorders in adult individuals (aged 18 years or more) exposed to adverse stress early in life. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis including experimental and quasi-experimental published studies indexed in CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases and/or in reference lists. Data management and critical appraisal (with the Study Quality Assessment Tools) was conducted independently by multiple researchers. A quality-effects model for meta-analysis was used for data synthesis and publication bias was assessed using the Doi plot and LFK index. The main outcome was short-term reductions in depressive symptoms. Results: Eight randomized controlled trials, three controlled before-and-after (pre-post) studies, and three uncontrolled before-and-after studies were included. Studies lacked bipolar disorder patients. Unclear randomization procedures and reporting of blinded outcome assessor, and limited use of intention-to-treat analysis, were relevant potential sources of bias. Meta-analyses indicated that psychological, pharmacological, and combined interventions were effective in reducing depressive symptoms in the short- (Cohen's d = −0.55, 95% CI −0.75 to −0.36, I(2) = 0%) and mid-term (Cohen's d = −0.66, 95% CI −1.07 to −0.25, I(2) = 65.0%). However, a high risk of publication bias was detected for these outcomes. A small number of studies, with mixed results, reported interventions with long-term improvements in depressive symptomatology, and short- and mid-term response to treatment and remission. Conclusion: Despite the well-documented long-lasting, negative, and costly impact of early adverse stressors on adult psychopathology, evidence on treatment alternatives remains scant. Trauma-focused treatment interventions—whether psychological interventions alone or in combination with pharmacotherapy—may have the potential to reduce the severity of depressive symptom in adults who were exposed to early adverse stress. Findings must be interpreted with considerable caution, as important study and outcome-level limitations were observed and gray literature was not considered in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8107272/ /pubmed/33981259 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650706 Text en Copyright © 2021 Martínez, Gloger, Diez de Medina, González, Carrasco, Schilling and Vöhringer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Martínez, Pablo
Gloger, Sergio
Diez de Medina, Dante
González, Arantza
Carrasco, María I.
Schilling, Sara
Vöhringer, Paul A.
Early Adverse Stress and Depressive and Bipolar Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Treatment Interventions
title Early Adverse Stress and Depressive and Bipolar Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Treatment Interventions
title_full Early Adverse Stress and Depressive and Bipolar Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Treatment Interventions
title_fullStr Early Adverse Stress and Depressive and Bipolar Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Treatment Interventions
title_full_unstemmed Early Adverse Stress and Depressive and Bipolar Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Treatment Interventions
title_short Early Adverse Stress and Depressive and Bipolar Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Treatment Interventions
title_sort early adverse stress and depressive and bipolar disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment interventions
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981259
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650706
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezpablo earlyadversestressanddepressiveandbipolardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftreatmentinterventions
AT glogersergio earlyadversestressanddepressiveandbipolardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftreatmentinterventions
AT diezdemedinadante earlyadversestressanddepressiveandbipolardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftreatmentinterventions
AT gonzalezarantza earlyadversestressanddepressiveandbipolardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftreatmentinterventions
AT carrascomariai earlyadversestressanddepressiveandbipolardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftreatmentinterventions
AT schillingsara earlyadversestressanddepressiveandbipolardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftreatmentinterventions
AT vohringerpaula earlyadversestressanddepressiveandbipolardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftreatmentinterventions