Cargando…
Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH)
ABSTRACT: APPROACH is an EU-wide research consortium with the goal to identify different subgroups of knee osteoarthritis to enable future differential diagnosis and treatment. During a 2-year clinical study images, biomarkers and clinical data are collected from people living with knee osteoarthrit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33971982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00267-0 |
_version_ | 1783689947502346240 |
---|---|
author | Taylor, Jane Dekker, Sjouke Jurg, Diny Skandsen, Jon Grossman, Maureen Marijnissen, Anne-Karien Ladel, Christoph Mobasheri, Ali Larkin, Jon Weinans, Harrie Kanter-Schlifke, Irene |
author_facet | Taylor, Jane Dekker, Sjouke Jurg, Diny Skandsen, Jon Grossman, Maureen Marijnissen, Anne-Karien Ladel, Christoph Mobasheri, Ali Larkin, Jon Weinans, Harrie Kanter-Schlifke, Irene |
author_sort | Taylor, Jane |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: APPROACH is an EU-wide research consortium with the goal to identify different subgroups of knee osteoarthritis to enable future differential diagnosis and treatment. During a 2-year clinical study images, biomarkers and clinical data are collected from people living with knee osteoarthritis and data are analyzed to confirm patterns that can indicate such different subgroups. A Patient Council (PC) has been set up at project initiation and consists of five people from Norway, The Netherlands and UK. Initially, this group of individuals had to learn how to effectively work with each other and with the researchers. Today, the PC is a strong team that is fully integrated in the consortium and acknowledged by researchers as an important sounding board. The article describes this journey looking at formal processes of involvement – organizational structure, budget, meetings – and more informal processes such as building relationships and changing researcher perceptions. It describes how the PC helped improve the experience and engagement of study participants by providing input to the clinical protocol and ensuring effective communication (e.g. through direct interactions with participants and newsletters). Furthermore, the PC is helping with dissemination of results and project advocacy, and overall provides the patient perspective to researchers. Additionally, the authors experienced and describe the intangible benefits such as a shift in researcher attitudes and a sense of community and purpose for PC members. Importantly, learnings reported in this article also include the challenges, such as effective integration of the PC with researchers’ work in the early phase of the project. TRIAL REGISTRATION: US National Library of Medicine, NCT03883568, retrospectively registered 21 March 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-021-00267-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8107424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81074242021-05-10 Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH) Taylor, Jane Dekker, Sjouke Jurg, Diny Skandsen, Jon Grossman, Maureen Marijnissen, Anne-Karien Ladel, Christoph Mobasheri, Ali Larkin, Jon Weinans, Harrie Kanter-Schlifke, Irene Res Involv Engagem Commentary ABSTRACT: APPROACH is an EU-wide research consortium with the goal to identify different subgroups of knee osteoarthritis to enable future differential diagnosis and treatment. During a 2-year clinical study images, biomarkers and clinical data are collected from people living with knee osteoarthritis and data are analyzed to confirm patterns that can indicate such different subgroups. A Patient Council (PC) has been set up at project initiation and consists of five people from Norway, The Netherlands and UK. Initially, this group of individuals had to learn how to effectively work with each other and with the researchers. Today, the PC is a strong team that is fully integrated in the consortium and acknowledged by researchers as an important sounding board. The article describes this journey looking at formal processes of involvement – organizational structure, budget, meetings – and more informal processes such as building relationships and changing researcher perceptions. It describes how the PC helped improve the experience and engagement of study participants by providing input to the clinical protocol and ensuring effective communication (e.g. through direct interactions with participants and newsletters). Furthermore, the PC is helping with dissemination of results and project advocacy, and overall provides the patient perspective to researchers. Additionally, the authors experienced and describe the intangible benefits such as a shift in researcher attitudes and a sense of community and purpose for PC members. Importantly, learnings reported in this article also include the challenges, such as effective integration of the PC with researchers’ work in the early phase of the project. TRIAL REGISTRATION: US National Library of Medicine, NCT03883568, retrospectively registered 21 March 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-021-00267-0. BioMed Central 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8107424/ /pubmed/33971982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00267-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Taylor, Jane Dekker, Sjouke Jurg, Diny Skandsen, Jon Grossman, Maureen Marijnissen, Anne-Karien Ladel, Christoph Mobasheri, Ali Larkin, Jon Weinans, Harrie Kanter-Schlifke, Irene Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH) |
title | Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH) |
title_full | Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH) |
title_fullStr | Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH) |
title_full_unstemmed | Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH) |
title_short | Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH) |
title_sort | making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an eu project (imi-approach) |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33971982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00267-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taylorjane makingthepatientvoiceheardinaresearchconsortiumexperiencesfromaneuprojectimiapproach AT dekkersjouke makingthepatientvoiceheardinaresearchconsortiumexperiencesfromaneuprojectimiapproach AT jurgdiny makingthepatientvoiceheardinaresearchconsortiumexperiencesfromaneuprojectimiapproach AT skandsenjon makingthepatientvoiceheardinaresearchconsortiumexperiencesfromaneuprojectimiapproach AT grossmanmaureen makingthepatientvoiceheardinaresearchconsortiumexperiencesfromaneuprojectimiapproach AT marijnissenannekarien makingthepatientvoiceheardinaresearchconsortiumexperiencesfromaneuprojectimiapproach AT ladelchristoph makingthepatientvoiceheardinaresearchconsortiumexperiencesfromaneuprojectimiapproach AT mobasheriali makingthepatientvoiceheardinaresearchconsortiumexperiencesfromaneuprojectimiapproach AT larkinjon makingthepatientvoiceheardinaresearchconsortiumexperiencesfromaneuprojectimiapproach AT weinansharrie makingthepatientvoiceheardinaresearchconsortiumexperiencesfromaneuprojectimiapproach AT kanterschlifkeirene makingthepatientvoiceheardinaresearchconsortiumexperiencesfromaneuprojectimiapproach AT makingthepatientvoiceheardinaresearchconsortiumexperiencesfromaneuprojectimiapproach |