Cargando…

Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking

People are likely to use their own knowledge as a frame of reference when they try to assess another person’s perspective. Due to this egocentric anchoring, people often overestimate the extent to which others share their point of view. This study investigated which type of feedback (if any) stimula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damen, Debby, van Amelsvoort, Marije, van der Wijst, Per, Pollmann, Monique, Krahmer, Emiel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33427086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021820987080
_version_ 1783689966381957120
author Damen, Debby
van Amelsvoort, Marije
van der Wijst, Per
Pollmann, Monique
Krahmer, Emiel
author_facet Damen, Debby
van Amelsvoort, Marije
van der Wijst, Per
Pollmann, Monique
Krahmer, Emiel
author_sort Damen, Debby
collection PubMed
description People are likely to use their own knowledge as a frame of reference when they try to assess another person’s perspective. Due to this egocentric anchoring, people often overestimate the extent to which others share their point of view. This study investigated which type of feedback (if any) stimulates perceivers to make estimations of another person’s perspective that are less biased by egocentric knowledge. We allocated participants to one of the three feedback conditions (no feedback, accuracy feedback, narrative feedback). Findings showed that participants who were given feedback adjusted their perspective-judgement more than those who did not receive feedback. They also showed less egocentric projection on future assessments. Participants adjusted their perspective within the same trial to the same degree for both feedback types. However, participants’ egocentric bias was only reduced when they received narrative feedback and not when they received accuracy feedback about their performance. Implications of these findings for theories of perspective-taking are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8107504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81075042021-05-17 Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking Damen, Debby van Amelsvoort, Marije van der Wijst, Per Pollmann, Monique Krahmer, Emiel Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Original Articles People are likely to use their own knowledge as a frame of reference when they try to assess another person’s perspective. Due to this egocentric anchoring, people often overestimate the extent to which others share their point of view. This study investigated which type of feedback (if any) stimulates perceivers to make estimations of another person’s perspective that are less biased by egocentric knowledge. We allocated participants to one of the three feedback conditions (no feedback, accuracy feedback, narrative feedback). Findings showed that participants who were given feedback adjusted their perspective-judgement more than those who did not receive feedback. They also showed less egocentric projection on future assessments. Participants adjusted their perspective within the same trial to the same degree for both feedback types. However, participants’ egocentric bias was only reduced when they received narrative feedback and not when they received accuracy feedback about their performance. Implications of these findings for theories of perspective-taking are discussed. SAGE Publications 2021-02-04 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8107504/ /pubmed/33427086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021820987080 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Lficense (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Damen, Debby
van Amelsvoort, Marije
van der Wijst, Per
Pollmann, Monique
Krahmer, Emiel
Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking
title Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking
title_full Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking
title_fullStr Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking
title_full_unstemmed Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking
title_short Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking
title_sort lifting the curse of knowing: how feedback improves perspective-taking
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33427086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021820987080
work_keys_str_mv AT damendebby liftingthecurseofknowinghowfeedbackimprovesperspectivetaking
AT vanamelsvoortmarije liftingthecurseofknowinghowfeedbackimprovesperspectivetaking
AT vanderwijstper liftingthecurseofknowinghowfeedbackimprovesperspectivetaking
AT pollmannmonique liftingthecurseofknowinghowfeedbackimprovesperspectivetaking
AT krahmeremiel liftingthecurseofknowinghowfeedbackimprovesperspectivetaking