Cargando…
Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking
People are likely to use their own knowledge as a frame of reference when they try to assess another person’s perspective. Due to this egocentric anchoring, people often overestimate the extent to which others share their point of view. This study investigated which type of feedback (if any) stimula...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33427086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021820987080 |
_version_ | 1783689966381957120 |
---|---|
author | Damen, Debby van Amelsvoort, Marije van der Wijst, Per Pollmann, Monique Krahmer, Emiel |
author_facet | Damen, Debby van Amelsvoort, Marije van der Wijst, Per Pollmann, Monique Krahmer, Emiel |
author_sort | Damen, Debby |
collection | PubMed |
description | People are likely to use their own knowledge as a frame of reference when they try to assess another person’s perspective. Due to this egocentric anchoring, people often overestimate the extent to which others share their point of view. This study investigated which type of feedback (if any) stimulates perceivers to make estimations of another person’s perspective that are less biased by egocentric knowledge. We allocated participants to one of the three feedback conditions (no feedback, accuracy feedback, narrative feedback). Findings showed that participants who were given feedback adjusted their perspective-judgement more than those who did not receive feedback. They also showed less egocentric projection on future assessments. Participants adjusted their perspective within the same trial to the same degree for both feedback types. However, participants’ egocentric bias was only reduced when they received narrative feedback and not when they received accuracy feedback about their performance. Implications of these findings for theories of perspective-taking are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8107504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81075042021-05-17 Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking Damen, Debby van Amelsvoort, Marije van der Wijst, Per Pollmann, Monique Krahmer, Emiel Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Original Articles People are likely to use their own knowledge as a frame of reference when they try to assess another person’s perspective. Due to this egocentric anchoring, people often overestimate the extent to which others share their point of view. This study investigated which type of feedback (if any) stimulates perceivers to make estimations of another person’s perspective that are less biased by egocentric knowledge. We allocated participants to one of the three feedback conditions (no feedback, accuracy feedback, narrative feedback). Findings showed that participants who were given feedback adjusted their perspective-judgement more than those who did not receive feedback. They also showed less egocentric projection on future assessments. Participants adjusted their perspective within the same trial to the same degree for both feedback types. However, participants’ egocentric bias was only reduced when they received narrative feedback and not when they received accuracy feedback about their performance. Implications of these findings for theories of perspective-taking are discussed. SAGE Publications 2021-02-04 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8107504/ /pubmed/33427086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021820987080 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Lficense (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Damen, Debby van Amelsvoort, Marije van der Wijst, Per Pollmann, Monique Krahmer, Emiel Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking |
title | Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking |
title_full | Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking |
title_fullStr | Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking |
title_full_unstemmed | Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking |
title_short | Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking |
title_sort | lifting the curse of knowing: how feedback improves perspective-taking |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33427086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021820987080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT damendebby liftingthecurseofknowinghowfeedbackimprovesperspectivetaking AT vanamelsvoortmarije liftingthecurseofknowinghowfeedbackimprovesperspectivetaking AT vanderwijstper liftingthecurseofknowinghowfeedbackimprovesperspectivetaking AT pollmannmonique liftingthecurseofknowinghowfeedbackimprovesperspectivetaking AT krahmeremiel liftingthecurseofknowinghowfeedbackimprovesperspectivetaking |