Cargando…
Minimally-invasive-perventricular-device-occlusion versus surgical-closure for treating perimembranous-ventricular-septal-defect: 3-year outcomes of a multicenter randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Minimally-invasive-perventricular-device-occlusion (MIPDO) combined superiority of surgical-repair and percutaneous-device-closure in treating perimembranous-ventricular-septal-defect (pmVSD). This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MIPDO for treating pmVSD, comparing with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34012561 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3298 |
_version_ | 1783689971078529024 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Wenxin Zhang, Fengwen Fan, Taibing Zhao, Tianli Han, Yu Hu, Xiaopeng Li, Qi Shi, Hao Pan, Xiangbin |
author_facet | Lu, Wenxin Zhang, Fengwen Fan, Taibing Zhao, Tianli Han, Yu Hu, Xiaopeng Li, Qi Shi, Hao Pan, Xiangbin |
author_sort | Lu, Wenxin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Minimally-invasive-perventricular-device-occlusion (MIPDO) combined superiority of surgical-repair and percutaneous-device-closure in treating perimembranous-ventricular-septal-defect (pmVSD). This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MIPDO for treating pmVSD, comparing with surgical-repair. METHODS: Patients aged ≥3 months with isolated pmVSDs were randomized to undergo either surgical or MIPDO procedure, with the median follow-up time of 49 months. The primary outcome was the rate of complete pmVSD closure at discharge. The secondary outcomes included the adverse events during hospitalization and follow-up, chest tube output volume, blood transfusion volume, procedural duration, ventilation time, hospitalization duration and hospitalization cost. Also, perioperative cardiac performance and systemic conditions were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 313 patients (9 months to 42 years old; median, 4 years old) with pmVSDs recruited from 3 centers, 100 were finally enrolled and randomly allocated 1:1 into two groups. The non-inferiority (non-inferiority margin −8.0%) of MIPDO to surgical closure regarding efficacy was shown in both intention-to-treat (0, 95% CI: −0.055 to 0.055) and per-protocol populations (0.02, 95% CI: −0.018 to 0.058). Although the rate of adverse events was similar between groups, the MIPDO group showed superiority in procedural duration, ventilation time, chest tube output volume, postoperative hospitalization time and hospitalization cost compared with surgical group (P<0.05). Moreover, MIPDO method showed comparable perioperative cardiac performance with milder change of systemic condition. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pmVSDs, MIPDO method showed non-inferiority to surgical closure in efficacy for both intention-to-treat and per-protocol population with easier perioperative recovery, economic benefit and promising outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8107524 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81075242021-05-18 Minimally-invasive-perventricular-device-occlusion versus surgical-closure for treating perimembranous-ventricular-septal-defect: 3-year outcomes of a multicenter randomized clinical trial Lu, Wenxin Zhang, Fengwen Fan, Taibing Zhao, Tianli Han, Yu Hu, Xiaopeng Li, Qi Shi, Hao Pan, Xiangbin J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Minimally-invasive-perventricular-device-occlusion (MIPDO) combined superiority of surgical-repair and percutaneous-device-closure in treating perimembranous-ventricular-septal-defect (pmVSD). This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MIPDO for treating pmVSD, comparing with surgical-repair. METHODS: Patients aged ≥3 months with isolated pmVSDs were randomized to undergo either surgical or MIPDO procedure, with the median follow-up time of 49 months. The primary outcome was the rate of complete pmVSD closure at discharge. The secondary outcomes included the adverse events during hospitalization and follow-up, chest tube output volume, blood transfusion volume, procedural duration, ventilation time, hospitalization duration and hospitalization cost. Also, perioperative cardiac performance and systemic conditions were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 313 patients (9 months to 42 years old; median, 4 years old) with pmVSDs recruited from 3 centers, 100 were finally enrolled and randomly allocated 1:1 into two groups. The non-inferiority (non-inferiority margin −8.0%) of MIPDO to surgical closure regarding efficacy was shown in both intention-to-treat (0, 95% CI: −0.055 to 0.055) and per-protocol populations (0.02, 95% CI: −0.018 to 0.058). Although the rate of adverse events was similar between groups, the MIPDO group showed superiority in procedural duration, ventilation time, chest tube output volume, postoperative hospitalization time and hospitalization cost compared with surgical group (P<0.05). Moreover, MIPDO method showed comparable perioperative cardiac performance with milder change of systemic condition. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pmVSDs, MIPDO method showed non-inferiority to surgical closure in efficacy for both intention-to-treat and per-protocol population with easier perioperative recovery, economic benefit and promising outcomes. AME Publishing Company 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8107524/ /pubmed/34012561 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3298 Text en 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lu, Wenxin Zhang, Fengwen Fan, Taibing Zhao, Tianli Han, Yu Hu, Xiaopeng Li, Qi Shi, Hao Pan, Xiangbin Minimally-invasive-perventricular-device-occlusion versus surgical-closure for treating perimembranous-ventricular-septal-defect: 3-year outcomes of a multicenter randomized clinical trial |
title | Minimally-invasive-perventricular-device-occlusion versus surgical-closure for treating perimembranous-ventricular-septal-defect: 3-year outcomes of a multicenter randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Minimally-invasive-perventricular-device-occlusion versus surgical-closure for treating perimembranous-ventricular-septal-defect: 3-year outcomes of a multicenter randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Minimally-invasive-perventricular-device-occlusion versus surgical-closure for treating perimembranous-ventricular-septal-defect: 3-year outcomes of a multicenter randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally-invasive-perventricular-device-occlusion versus surgical-closure for treating perimembranous-ventricular-septal-defect: 3-year outcomes of a multicenter randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Minimally-invasive-perventricular-device-occlusion versus surgical-closure for treating perimembranous-ventricular-septal-defect: 3-year outcomes of a multicenter randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | minimally-invasive-perventricular-device-occlusion versus surgical-closure for treating perimembranous-ventricular-septal-defect: 3-year outcomes of a multicenter randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34012561 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3298 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luwenxin minimallyinvasiveperventriculardeviceocclusionversussurgicalclosurefortreatingperimembranousventricularseptaldefect3yearoutcomesofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT zhangfengwen minimallyinvasiveperventriculardeviceocclusionversussurgicalclosurefortreatingperimembranousventricularseptaldefect3yearoutcomesofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT fantaibing minimallyinvasiveperventriculardeviceocclusionversussurgicalclosurefortreatingperimembranousventricularseptaldefect3yearoutcomesofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT zhaotianli minimallyinvasiveperventriculardeviceocclusionversussurgicalclosurefortreatingperimembranousventricularseptaldefect3yearoutcomesofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT hanyu minimallyinvasiveperventriculardeviceocclusionversussurgicalclosurefortreatingperimembranousventricularseptaldefect3yearoutcomesofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT huxiaopeng minimallyinvasiveperventriculardeviceocclusionversussurgicalclosurefortreatingperimembranousventricularseptaldefect3yearoutcomesofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT liqi minimallyinvasiveperventriculardeviceocclusionversussurgicalclosurefortreatingperimembranousventricularseptaldefect3yearoutcomesofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT shihao minimallyinvasiveperventriculardeviceocclusionversussurgicalclosurefortreatingperimembranousventricularseptaldefect3yearoutcomesofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT panxiangbin minimallyinvasiveperventriculardeviceocclusionversussurgicalclosurefortreatingperimembranousventricularseptaldefect3yearoutcomesofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial |