Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of an implantable device for management of gastroesophageal reflux in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a promising minimally invasive surgical technique for management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, device implantation after transplantation has not been studied and may be concerning in these immunosuppressed patients. We explor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halpern, Samantha E., Gupta, Aryaman, Jawitz, Oliver K., Choi, Ashley Y., Salfity, Hai V., Klapper, Jacob A., Hartwig, Matthew G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34012562
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3276
_version_ 1783689971805192192
author Halpern, Samantha E.
Gupta, Aryaman
Jawitz, Oliver K.
Choi, Ashley Y.
Salfity, Hai V.
Klapper, Jacob A.
Hartwig, Matthew G.
author_facet Halpern, Samantha E.
Gupta, Aryaman
Jawitz, Oliver K.
Choi, Ashley Y.
Salfity, Hai V.
Klapper, Jacob A.
Hartwig, Matthew G.
author_sort Halpern, Samantha E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a promising minimally invasive surgical technique for management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, device implantation after transplantation has not been studied and may be concerning in these immunosuppressed patients. We explored the safety of the LINX Reflux Management System (MSA device) for management of GERD following lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: Lung transplant recipients who underwent LINX implantation at our institution between 2017 and 2019 were followed prospectively in the Reflux Following Lung Transplantation and Associated Treatment Registry. Ambulatory pH testing and acid-suppressing medication use were compared before and after LINX implantation. One-year outcomes and change in pulmonary function were compared between matched LINX and fundoplication groups. RESULTS: Of 17 patients who underwent post-lung transplant LINX implantation, 8 (47.1%) agreed to undergo post-LINX pH testing. Three/eight (37.5%) patients achieved normal esophageal acid exposure time; 14 (82.4%) remained on acid-suppressing medication at one-year under the direction of their transplant teams. One-year patient survival and change in pulmonary function were similar between groups. LINX patients experienced more early side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the LINX MSA device in a cohort of lung transplant recipients at our institution was associated with similar short-term safety compared to traditional fundoplication, however assessment of efficacy was limited. Further investigation is needed to characterize the long-term efficacy of LINX implantation after LTx.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8107527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81075272021-05-18 Safety and efficacy of an implantable device for management of gastroesophageal reflux in lung transplant recipients Halpern, Samantha E. Gupta, Aryaman Jawitz, Oliver K. Choi, Ashley Y. Salfity, Hai V. Klapper, Jacob A. Hartwig, Matthew G. J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a promising minimally invasive surgical technique for management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, device implantation after transplantation has not been studied and may be concerning in these immunosuppressed patients. We explored the safety of the LINX Reflux Management System (MSA device) for management of GERD following lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: Lung transplant recipients who underwent LINX implantation at our institution between 2017 and 2019 were followed prospectively in the Reflux Following Lung Transplantation and Associated Treatment Registry. Ambulatory pH testing and acid-suppressing medication use were compared before and after LINX implantation. One-year outcomes and change in pulmonary function were compared between matched LINX and fundoplication groups. RESULTS: Of 17 patients who underwent post-lung transplant LINX implantation, 8 (47.1%) agreed to undergo post-LINX pH testing. Three/eight (37.5%) patients achieved normal esophageal acid exposure time; 14 (82.4%) remained on acid-suppressing medication at one-year under the direction of their transplant teams. One-year patient survival and change in pulmonary function were similar between groups. LINX patients experienced more early side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the LINX MSA device in a cohort of lung transplant recipients at our institution was associated with similar short-term safety compared to traditional fundoplication, however assessment of efficacy was limited. Further investigation is needed to characterize the long-term efficacy of LINX implantation after LTx. AME Publishing Company 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8107527/ /pubmed/34012562 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3276 Text en 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Halpern, Samantha E.
Gupta, Aryaman
Jawitz, Oliver K.
Choi, Ashley Y.
Salfity, Hai V.
Klapper, Jacob A.
Hartwig, Matthew G.
Safety and efficacy of an implantable device for management of gastroesophageal reflux in lung transplant recipients
title Safety and efficacy of an implantable device for management of gastroesophageal reflux in lung transplant recipients
title_full Safety and efficacy of an implantable device for management of gastroesophageal reflux in lung transplant recipients
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of an implantable device for management of gastroesophageal reflux in lung transplant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of an implantable device for management of gastroesophageal reflux in lung transplant recipients
title_short Safety and efficacy of an implantable device for management of gastroesophageal reflux in lung transplant recipients
title_sort safety and efficacy of an implantable device for management of gastroesophageal reflux in lung transplant recipients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8107527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34012562
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3276
work_keys_str_mv AT halpernsamanthae safetyandefficacyofanimplantabledeviceformanagementofgastroesophagealrefluxinlungtransplantrecipients
AT guptaaryaman safetyandefficacyofanimplantabledeviceformanagementofgastroesophagealrefluxinlungtransplantrecipients
AT jawitzoliverk safetyandefficacyofanimplantabledeviceformanagementofgastroesophagealrefluxinlungtransplantrecipients
AT choiashleyy safetyandefficacyofanimplantabledeviceformanagementofgastroesophagealrefluxinlungtransplantrecipients
AT salfityhaiv safetyandefficacyofanimplantabledeviceformanagementofgastroesophagealrefluxinlungtransplantrecipients
AT klapperjacoba safetyandefficacyofanimplantabledeviceformanagementofgastroesophagealrefluxinlungtransplantrecipients
AT hartwigmatthewg safetyandefficacyofanimplantabledeviceformanagementofgastroesophagealrefluxinlungtransplantrecipients