Use of item response theory to investigate disability-related questions in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

OBJECTIVES: Accurately measuring disability is critical toward policy development, economic analyses, and determining individual-level effects of health interventions. Nationally representative population surveys such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey provide key opportunities to measure disability constructs such as activity limitations. However, only very limited work has previously evaluated the item response properties of questions pertaining to limitations in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. We included participants ⩾20 years old for the 2013–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles. Activity limitations, and a smaller number of body function impairments or participation restrictions, were determined from interview questions. We performed item response theory models (a two-parameter logistic and a graded response model) to characterize discriminating information along the latent continuum of activity limitation. RESULTS: We included 17,057 participants. Although each particular limitation was somewhat rare (maximally 13%), 7214 (38%) responded having at least one limitation. We found a high amount of discriminating information at 1–2 standard deviations above average limitation, though essentially zero discrimination below that range. Items had substantial overlap in the range at which they provided information distinguishing individuals. The ordinal graded response model including 20 limitations provided greater information than the dichotomous two-parameter logistic model, though further omitting items from the graded response model led to loss of information. CONCLUSION: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey disability-related questions, mostly specifically activity limitations, provided a high degree of information distinguishing individuals with higher than average limitations on the latent continuum, but essentially zero resolution to distinguish individuals with low or average limitations. Future work may focus on developing items which better distinguish individuals at the “lower” end of the limitation spectrum.