Cargando…
Co-designing strategies to support patient partners during a scoping review and reflections on the process: a commentary
BACKGROUND: Patient partners can be described as individuals who assume roles as active members on research teams, indicative of individuals with greater involvement, increased sharing of power, and increased responsibility than traditionally described by patient participants who are primarily studi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33971974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00272-3 |
_version_ | 1783690055899938816 |
---|---|
author | McCarron, Tamara L. Clement, Fiona Rasiah, Jananee Moffat, Karen Wasylak, Tracy Santana, Maria Jose |
author_facet | McCarron, Tamara L. Clement, Fiona Rasiah, Jananee Moffat, Karen Wasylak, Tracy Santana, Maria Jose |
author_sort | McCarron, Tamara L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient partners can be described as individuals who assume roles as active members on research teams, indicative of individuals with greater involvement, increased sharing of power, and increased responsibility than traditionally described by patient participants who are primarily studied. A gap still remains in the understanding of how to engage patients. The objective of this commentary is to describe the involvement of four patient partners who worked with researchers during a scoping review. MAIN BODY: We describe approaches to meaningfully engage patient partners in conducting a scoping review. Patient partners were recruited through existing patient networks. Capacity development in the form of the training was provided to these four patient partners. Engagement strategies were co-designed with them to address potential barriers of involvement and acquiring the necessary skills for the successful completion of this scoping review. CONCLUSION: Involving patients partners early in the project established the foundational relationship so patient partners could contribute to their fullest. We witnessed the success of working alongside patient partners as members of the research team with a clear and mutually agreed upon purpose of the engagement in health research activities and how this seemed to contribute to an effective and rewarding experience for both researcher and patient partner. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-021-00272-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8108017 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81080172021-05-10 Co-designing strategies to support patient partners during a scoping review and reflections on the process: a commentary McCarron, Tamara L. Clement, Fiona Rasiah, Jananee Moffat, Karen Wasylak, Tracy Santana, Maria Jose Res Involv Engagem Commentary BACKGROUND: Patient partners can be described as individuals who assume roles as active members on research teams, indicative of individuals with greater involvement, increased sharing of power, and increased responsibility than traditionally described by patient participants who are primarily studied. A gap still remains in the understanding of how to engage patients. The objective of this commentary is to describe the involvement of four patient partners who worked with researchers during a scoping review. MAIN BODY: We describe approaches to meaningfully engage patient partners in conducting a scoping review. Patient partners were recruited through existing patient networks. Capacity development in the form of the training was provided to these four patient partners. Engagement strategies were co-designed with them to address potential barriers of involvement and acquiring the necessary skills for the successful completion of this scoping review. CONCLUSION: Involving patients partners early in the project established the foundational relationship so patient partners could contribute to their fullest. We witnessed the success of working alongside patient partners as members of the research team with a clear and mutually agreed upon purpose of the engagement in health research activities and how this seemed to contribute to an effective and rewarding experience for both researcher and patient partner. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-021-00272-3. BioMed Central 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8108017/ /pubmed/33971974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00272-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary McCarron, Tamara L. Clement, Fiona Rasiah, Jananee Moffat, Karen Wasylak, Tracy Santana, Maria Jose Co-designing strategies to support patient partners during a scoping review and reflections on the process: a commentary |
title | Co-designing strategies to support patient partners during a scoping review and reflections on the process: a commentary |
title_full | Co-designing strategies to support patient partners during a scoping review and reflections on the process: a commentary |
title_fullStr | Co-designing strategies to support patient partners during a scoping review and reflections on the process: a commentary |
title_full_unstemmed | Co-designing strategies to support patient partners during a scoping review and reflections on the process: a commentary |
title_short | Co-designing strategies to support patient partners during a scoping review and reflections on the process: a commentary |
title_sort | co-designing strategies to support patient partners during a scoping review and reflections on the process: a commentary |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33971974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00272-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccarrontamaral codesigningstrategiestosupportpatientpartnersduringascopingreviewandreflectionsontheprocessacommentary AT clementfiona codesigningstrategiestosupportpatientpartnersduringascopingreviewandreflectionsontheprocessacommentary AT rasiahjananee codesigningstrategiestosupportpatientpartnersduringascopingreviewandreflectionsontheprocessacommentary AT moffatkaren codesigningstrategiestosupportpatientpartnersduringascopingreviewandreflectionsontheprocessacommentary AT wasylaktracy codesigningstrategiestosupportpatientpartnersduringascopingreviewandreflectionsontheprocessacommentary AT santanamariajose codesigningstrategiestosupportpatientpartnersduringascopingreviewandreflectionsontheprocessacommentary |