Cargando…

Effectiveness and safety of dimethyl fumarate in progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND: There is limited data analyzing the safety and effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in the progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) population. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the safety and effectiveness of DMF in patients with PMS. METHODS: We used Cox proportional hazards models to compare the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moreira Ferreira, Vanessa F, Liu, Yanqing, Healy, Brian C, Stankiewicz, James M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33996142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552173211010832
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: There is limited data analyzing the safety and effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in the progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) population. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the safety and effectiveness of DMF in patients with PMS. METHODS: We used Cox proportional hazards models to compare the time to confirmed worsening and improvement on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) between patients treated with DMF and glatiramer acetate (GA) for at least one year. RESULTS: We included 46 patients treated with DMF and 42 patients treated with GA. The safety and tolerability of GA and DMF were consistent with established profiles. There was no difference in confirmed EDSS progression. A trend towards reduced T25FW was seen in the DMF compared to GA after adjustment (HR = 0.86; 95% CI:0.37, 1.98; p = 0.72 and HR = 0.60; 95% CI:0.27, 1.34; p = 0.21, respectively). CONCLUSION: Dimethyl fumarate showed a trend towards reduction in T25FW but no evidence of clinically significant impact on EDSS. The small sample precluded definitive determination.