Cargando…
Validity of Surrogate Endpoints and Their Impact on Coverage Recommendations: A Retrospective Analysis across International Health Technology Assessment Agencies
BACKGROUND: Surrogate endpoints (i.e., intermediate endpoints intended to predict for patient-centered outcomes) are increasingly common. However, little is known about how surrogate evidence is handled in the context of health technology assessment (HTA). OBJECTIVES: 1) To map methodologies for the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33719711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X21994553 |
_version_ | 1783690070483533824 |
---|---|
author | Ciani, Oriana Grigore, Bogdan Blommestein, Hedwig de Groot, Saskia Möllenkamp, Meilin Rabbe, Stefan Daubner-Bendes, Rita Taylor, Rod S. |
author_facet | Ciani, Oriana Grigore, Bogdan Blommestein, Hedwig de Groot, Saskia Möllenkamp, Meilin Rabbe, Stefan Daubner-Bendes, Rita Taylor, Rod S. |
author_sort | Ciani, Oriana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surrogate endpoints (i.e., intermediate endpoints intended to predict for patient-centered outcomes) are increasingly common. However, little is known about how surrogate evidence is handled in the context of health technology assessment (HTA). OBJECTIVES: 1) To map methodologies for the validation of surrogate endpoints and 2) to determine their impact on acceptability of surrogates and coverage decisions made by HTA agencies. METHODS: We sought HTA reports where evaluation relied on a surrogate from 8 HTA agencies. We extracted data on the methods applied for surrogate validation. We assessed the level of agreement between agencies and fitted mixed-effects logistic regression models to test the impact of validation approaches on the agency’s acceptability of the surrogate endpoint and their coverage recommendation. RESULTS: Of the 124 included reports, 61 (49%) discussed the level of evidence to support the relationship between the surrogate and the patient-centered endpoint, 27 (22%) reported a correlation coefficient/association measure, and 40 (32%) quantified the expected effect on the patient-centered outcome. Overall, the surrogate endpoint was deemed acceptable in 49 (40%) reports (k-coefficient 0.10, P = 0.004). Any consideration of the level of evidence was associated with accepting the surrogate endpoint as valid (odds ratio [OR], 4.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60–13.18, P = 0.005). However, we did not find strong evidence of an association between accepting the surrogate endpoint and agency coverage recommendation (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.23–2.20; P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Handling of surrogate endpoint evidence in reports varied greatly across HTA agencies, with inconsistent consideration of the level of evidence and statistical validation. Our findings call for careful reconsideration of the issue of surrogacy and the need for harmonization of practices across international HTA agencies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8108112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81081122021-05-17 Validity of Surrogate Endpoints and Their Impact on Coverage Recommendations: A Retrospective Analysis across International Health Technology Assessment Agencies Ciani, Oriana Grigore, Bogdan Blommestein, Hedwig de Groot, Saskia Möllenkamp, Meilin Rabbe, Stefan Daubner-Bendes, Rita Taylor, Rod S. Med Decis Making Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: Surrogate endpoints (i.e., intermediate endpoints intended to predict for patient-centered outcomes) are increasingly common. However, little is known about how surrogate evidence is handled in the context of health technology assessment (HTA). OBJECTIVES: 1) To map methodologies for the validation of surrogate endpoints and 2) to determine their impact on acceptability of surrogates and coverage decisions made by HTA agencies. METHODS: We sought HTA reports where evaluation relied on a surrogate from 8 HTA agencies. We extracted data on the methods applied for surrogate validation. We assessed the level of agreement between agencies and fitted mixed-effects logistic regression models to test the impact of validation approaches on the agency’s acceptability of the surrogate endpoint and their coverage recommendation. RESULTS: Of the 124 included reports, 61 (49%) discussed the level of evidence to support the relationship between the surrogate and the patient-centered endpoint, 27 (22%) reported a correlation coefficient/association measure, and 40 (32%) quantified the expected effect on the patient-centered outcome. Overall, the surrogate endpoint was deemed acceptable in 49 (40%) reports (k-coefficient 0.10, P = 0.004). Any consideration of the level of evidence was associated with accepting the surrogate endpoint as valid (odds ratio [OR], 4.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60–13.18, P = 0.005). However, we did not find strong evidence of an association between accepting the surrogate endpoint and agency coverage recommendation (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.23–2.20; P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Handling of surrogate endpoint evidence in reports varied greatly across HTA agencies, with inconsistent consideration of the level of evidence and statistical validation. Our findings call for careful reconsideration of the issue of surrogacy and the need for harmonization of practices across international HTA agencies. SAGE Publications 2021-03-10 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8108112/ /pubmed/33719711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X21994553 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Ciani, Oriana Grigore, Bogdan Blommestein, Hedwig de Groot, Saskia Möllenkamp, Meilin Rabbe, Stefan Daubner-Bendes, Rita Taylor, Rod S. Validity of Surrogate Endpoints and Their Impact on Coverage Recommendations: A Retrospective Analysis across International Health Technology Assessment Agencies |
title | Validity of Surrogate Endpoints and Their Impact on Coverage Recommendations: A Retrospective Analysis across International Health Technology Assessment Agencies |
title_full | Validity of Surrogate Endpoints and Their Impact on Coverage Recommendations: A Retrospective Analysis across International Health Technology Assessment Agencies |
title_fullStr | Validity of Surrogate Endpoints and Their Impact on Coverage Recommendations: A Retrospective Analysis across International Health Technology Assessment Agencies |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of Surrogate Endpoints and Their Impact on Coverage Recommendations: A Retrospective Analysis across International Health Technology Assessment Agencies |
title_short | Validity of Surrogate Endpoints and Their Impact on Coverage Recommendations: A Retrospective Analysis across International Health Technology Assessment Agencies |
title_sort | validity of surrogate endpoints and their impact on coverage recommendations: a retrospective analysis across international health technology assessment agencies |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33719711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X21994553 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cianioriana validityofsurrogateendpointsandtheirimpactoncoveragerecommendationsaretrospectiveanalysisacrossinternationalhealthtechnologyassessmentagencies AT grigorebogdan validityofsurrogateendpointsandtheirimpactoncoveragerecommendationsaretrospectiveanalysisacrossinternationalhealthtechnologyassessmentagencies AT blommesteinhedwig validityofsurrogateendpointsandtheirimpactoncoveragerecommendationsaretrospectiveanalysisacrossinternationalhealthtechnologyassessmentagencies AT degrootsaskia validityofsurrogateendpointsandtheirimpactoncoveragerecommendationsaretrospectiveanalysisacrossinternationalhealthtechnologyassessmentagencies AT mollenkampmeilin validityofsurrogateendpointsandtheirimpactoncoveragerecommendationsaretrospectiveanalysisacrossinternationalhealthtechnologyassessmentagencies AT rabbestefan validityofsurrogateendpointsandtheirimpactoncoveragerecommendationsaretrospectiveanalysisacrossinternationalhealthtechnologyassessmentagencies AT daubnerbendesrita validityofsurrogateendpointsandtheirimpactoncoveragerecommendationsaretrospectiveanalysisacrossinternationalhealthtechnologyassessmentagencies AT taylorrods validityofsurrogateendpointsandtheirimpactoncoveragerecommendationsaretrospectiveanalysisacrossinternationalhealthtechnologyassessmentagencies |