Cargando…

Outcomes of patients with cervical cancer treated with low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy after concurrent chemoradiation

OBJECTIVE: The majority of patients with cervical cancer in Ghana present with locally advanced disease. In October 2014, high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy was introduced at the National Center for Radiotherapy, Accra after years of using low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. The aim of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Aba Anoa, Yarney, Joel, Vanderpuye, Verna, Akoto Aidoo, Charles, Agyeman, Mervin, Boateng, Samuel Ntiamoah, Sasu, Evans, Anarfi, Kwabena, Obeng-Mensah, Tony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33558421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-002120
_version_ 1783690099413745664
author Scott, Aba Anoa
Yarney, Joel
Vanderpuye, Verna
Akoto Aidoo, Charles
Agyeman, Mervin
Boateng, Samuel Ntiamoah
Sasu, Evans
Anarfi, Kwabena
Obeng-Mensah, Tony
author_facet Scott, Aba Anoa
Yarney, Joel
Vanderpuye, Verna
Akoto Aidoo, Charles
Agyeman, Mervin
Boateng, Samuel Ntiamoah
Sasu, Evans
Anarfi, Kwabena
Obeng-Mensah, Tony
author_sort Scott, Aba Anoa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The majority of patients with cervical cancer in Ghana present with locally advanced disease. In October 2014, high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy was introduced at the National Center for Radiotherapy, Accra after years of using low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes of patients treated with LDR versus HDR brachytherapy. METHODS: Patients with cervical cancer treated from January 2008 to December 2017 were reviewed. Those with stage IB–IIIB who received chemoradiation plus brachytherapy were included in the study. Post-operative patients and those with stage IV were excluded. The study end points were local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival at 2 years. Endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Comparisons between treatment groups were performed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We included 284 LDR and 136 HDR brachytherapy patients. For stages IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA and IIIB disease, the 2-year local control for LDR versus HDR brachytherapy was 63% and 61% (p=0.35), 86% and 90% (p=0.68), 86% and 88% (p=0.83), 66% and 60% (p=0.56), and 77% and 40% (p=0.005), respectively. The 2-year disease-free survival for LDR versus HDR brachytherapy was 64% and 61% (p=0.50), 81% and 69% (p=0.18), 81% and 80% (p=0.54), 62% and 33% (p=0.82), and 71% and 30% (p=0.001) for stages IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, and IIIB, respectively. The 2-year overall survival for LDR versus HDR brachytherapy was 94% and 93% (p=0.92), 98% and 68% (p=0.21), 89% and 88% (p=0.60), and 88% and 82% (p=0.34) for stages IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIB disease, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between LDR and HDR brachytherapy in local control and disease-free survival for all stages of disease, except in stage IIIB. These findings highlight the need to refine this brachytherapy technique for this group of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8108283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81082832021-05-24 Outcomes of patients with cervical cancer treated with low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy after concurrent chemoradiation Scott, Aba Anoa Yarney, Joel Vanderpuye, Verna Akoto Aidoo, Charles Agyeman, Mervin Boateng, Samuel Ntiamoah Sasu, Evans Anarfi, Kwabena Obeng-Mensah, Tony Int J Gynecol Cancer Original Research OBJECTIVE: The majority of patients with cervical cancer in Ghana present with locally advanced disease. In October 2014, high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy was introduced at the National Center for Radiotherapy, Accra after years of using low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes of patients treated with LDR versus HDR brachytherapy. METHODS: Patients with cervical cancer treated from January 2008 to December 2017 were reviewed. Those with stage IB–IIIB who received chemoradiation plus brachytherapy were included in the study. Post-operative patients and those with stage IV were excluded. The study end points were local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival at 2 years. Endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Comparisons between treatment groups were performed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We included 284 LDR and 136 HDR brachytherapy patients. For stages IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA and IIIB disease, the 2-year local control for LDR versus HDR brachytherapy was 63% and 61% (p=0.35), 86% and 90% (p=0.68), 86% and 88% (p=0.83), 66% and 60% (p=0.56), and 77% and 40% (p=0.005), respectively. The 2-year disease-free survival for LDR versus HDR brachytherapy was 64% and 61% (p=0.50), 81% and 69% (p=0.18), 81% and 80% (p=0.54), 62% and 33% (p=0.82), and 71% and 30% (p=0.001) for stages IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, and IIIB, respectively. The 2-year overall survival for LDR versus HDR brachytherapy was 94% and 93% (p=0.92), 98% and 68% (p=0.21), 89% and 88% (p=0.60), and 88% and 82% (p=0.34) for stages IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIB disease, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between LDR and HDR brachytherapy in local control and disease-free survival for all stages of disease, except in stage IIIB. These findings highlight the need to refine this brachytherapy technique for this group of patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8108283/ /pubmed/33558421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-002120 Text en © IGCS and ESGO 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, an indication of whether changes were made, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Scott, Aba Anoa
Yarney, Joel
Vanderpuye, Verna
Akoto Aidoo, Charles
Agyeman, Mervin
Boateng, Samuel Ntiamoah
Sasu, Evans
Anarfi, Kwabena
Obeng-Mensah, Tony
Outcomes of patients with cervical cancer treated with low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy after concurrent chemoradiation
title Outcomes of patients with cervical cancer treated with low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy after concurrent chemoradiation
title_full Outcomes of patients with cervical cancer treated with low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy after concurrent chemoradiation
title_fullStr Outcomes of patients with cervical cancer treated with low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy after concurrent chemoradiation
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of patients with cervical cancer treated with low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy after concurrent chemoradiation
title_short Outcomes of patients with cervical cancer treated with low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy after concurrent chemoradiation
title_sort outcomes of patients with cervical cancer treated with low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy after concurrent chemoradiation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33558421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-002120
work_keys_str_mv AT scottabaanoa outcomesofpatientswithcervicalcancertreatedwithloworhighdoseratebrachytherapyafterconcurrentchemoradiation
AT yarneyjoel outcomesofpatientswithcervicalcancertreatedwithloworhighdoseratebrachytherapyafterconcurrentchemoradiation
AT vanderpuyeverna outcomesofpatientswithcervicalcancertreatedwithloworhighdoseratebrachytherapyafterconcurrentchemoradiation
AT akotoaidoocharles outcomesofpatientswithcervicalcancertreatedwithloworhighdoseratebrachytherapyafterconcurrentchemoradiation
AT agyemanmervin outcomesofpatientswithcervicalcancertreatedwithloworhighdoseratebrachytherapyafterconcurrentchemoradiation
AT boatengsamuelntiamoah outcomesofpatientswithcervicalcancertreatedwithloworhighdoseratebrachytherapyafterconcurrentchemoradiation
AT sasuevans outcomesofpatientswithcervicalcancertreatedwithloworhighdoseratebrachytherapyafterconcurrentchemoradiation
AT anarfikwabena outcomesofpatientswithcervicalcancertreatedwithloworhighdoseratebrachytherapyafterconcurrentchemoradiation
AT obengmensahtony outcomesofpatientswithcervicalcancertreatedwithloworhighdoseratebrachytherapyafterconcurrentchemoradiation