Cargando…

No evidence to support the impact of migration background on treatment response rates and cancer survival: a retrospective matched-pair analysis in Germany

BACKGROUND: Immigration has taken the central stage in world politics, especially in the developed countries like Germany, where the continuous flow of immigrants has been well documented since 1960s. Strikingly, emerging data suggest that migrant patients have a poorer response to the treatment and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rüdiger, Roman, Geiser, Franziska, Ritter, Manuel, Brossart, Peter, Keyver-Paik, Mignon-Denise, Faridi, Andree, Vatter, Hartmut, Bootz, Friedrich, Landsberg, Jennifer, Kalff, Jörg C., Herrlinger, Ulrich, Kristiansen, Glen, Pietsch, Torsten, Aretz, Stefan, Thomas, Daniel, Radbruch, Lukas, Kramer, Franz-Josef, Strassburg, Christian P., Gonzalez-Carmona, Maria, Skowasch, Dirk, Essler, Markus, Schmid, Matthias, Nadal, Jennifer, Ernstmann, Nicole, Sharma, Amit, Funke, Benjamin, Schmidt-Wolf, Ingo G. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33971845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08141-8
_version_ 1783690114530017280
author Rüdiger, Roman
Geiser, Franziska
Ritter, Manuel
Brossart, Peter
Keyver-Paik, Mignon-Denise
Faridi, Andree
Vatter, Hartmut
Bootz, Friedrich
Landsberg, Jennifer
Kalff, Jörg C.
Herrlinger, Ulrich
Kristiansen, Glen
Pietsch, Torsten
Aretz, Stefan
Thomas, Daniel
Radbruch, Lukas
Kramer, Franz-Josef
Strassburg, Christian P.
Gonzalez-Carmona, Maria
Skowasch, Dirk
Essler, Markus
Schmid, Matthias
Nadal, Jennifer
Ernstmann, Nicole
Sharma, Amit
Funke, Benjamin
Schmidt-Wolf, Ingo G. H.
author_facet Rüdiger, Roman
Geiser, Franziska
Ritter, Manuel
Brossart, Peter
Keyver-Paik, Mignon-Denise
Faridi, Andree
Vatter, Hartmut
Bootz, Friedrich
Landsberg, Jennifer
Kalff, Jörg C.
Herrlinger, Ulrich
Kristiansen, Glen
Pietsch, Torsten
Aretz, Stefan
Thomas, Daniel
Radbruch, Lukas
Kramer, Franz-Josef
Strassburg, Christian P.
Gonzalez-Carmona, Maria
Skowasch, Dirk
Essler, Markus
Schmid, Matthias
Nadal, Jennifer
Ernstmann, Nicole
Sharma, Amit
Funke, Benjamin
Schmidt-Wolf, Ingo G. H.
author_sort Rüdiger, Roman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immigration has taken the central stage in world politics, especially in the developed countries like Germany, where the continuous flow of immigrants has been well documented since 1960s. Strikingly, emerging data suggest that migrant patients have a poorer response to the treatment and lower survival rates in their new host country, raising concerns about health disparities. Herein, we present our investigation on the treatment response rate and cancer survival in German patients with and without an immigrant background that were treated at our comprehensive cancer center in Germany. METHODS: Initially, we considered 8162 cancer patients treated at the Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Germany (April 2002–December 2015) for matched-pair analysis. Subsequently, the German patients with a migration background and those from the native German population were manually identified and catalogued using a highly specific name-based algorithm. The clinical parameters such as demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, defined staging criteria, and primary therapy were further adjusted. Using these stringent criteria, a total of 422 patients (n = 211, Germans with migration background; n = 211, native German population) were screened to compare for the treatment response and survival rates (i.e., 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and time to progression). RESULTS: Compared to the cohort with migration background, the cohort without migration background was slightly older (54.9 vs. 57.9 years) while having the same sex distribution (54.5% vs. 55.0% female) and longer follow-up time (36.9 vs. 42.6 months). We did not find significant differences in cancer survival (5-year overall survival, P = 0.771) and the response rates (Overall Remission Rate; McNemar’s test, P = 0.346) between both collectives. CONCLUSION: Contrary to prior reports, we found no significant differences in cancer survival between German patients with immigrant background and native German patients. Nevertheless, the advanced treatment protocols implemented at our comprehensive cancer center may possibly account for the low variance in outcome. To conduct similar studies with a broader perspective, we propose that certain risk factors (country-of-origin-specific infections, dietary habits, epigenetics for chronic diseases etc.) should be considered, specially in the future studies that will recruit new arrivals from the 2015 German refugee crisis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8108356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81083562021-05-11 No evidence to support the impact of migration background on treatment response rates and cancer survival: a retrospective matched-pair analysis in Germany Rüdiger, Roman Geiser, Franziska Ritter, Manuel Brossart, Peter Keyver-Paik, Mignon-Denise Faridi, Andree Vatter, Hartmut Bootz, Friedrich Landsberg, Jennifer Kalff, Jörg C. Herrlinger, Ulrich Kristiansen, Glen Pietsch, Torsten Aretz, Stefan Thomas, Daniel Radbruch, Lukas Kramer, Franz-Josef Strassburg, Christian P. Gonzalez-Carmona, Maria Skowasch, Dirk Essler, Markus Schmid, Matthias Nadal, Jennifer Ernstmann, Nicole Sharma, Amit Funke, Benjamin Schmidt-Wolf, Ingo G. H. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Immigration has taken the central stage in world politics, especially in the developed countries like Germany, where the continuous flow of immigrants has been well documented since 1960s. Strikingly, emerging data suggest that migrant patients have a poorer response to the treatment and lower survival rates in their new host country, raising concerns about health disparities. Herein, we present our investigation on the treatment response rate and cancer survival in German patients with and without an immigrant background that were treated at our comprehensive cancer center in Germany. METHODS: Initially, we considered 8162 cancer patients treated at the Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Germany (April 2002–December 2015) for matched-pair analysis. Subsequently, the German patients with a migration background and those from the native German population were manually identified and catalogued using a highly specific name-based algorithm. The clinical parameters such as demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, defined staging criteria, and primary therapy were further adjusted. Using these stringent criteria, a total of 422 patients (n = 211, Germans with migration background; n = 211, native German population) were screened to compare for the treatment response and survival rates (i.e., 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and time to progression). RESULTS: Compared to the cohort with migration background, the cohort without migration background was slightly older (54.9 vs. 57.9 years) while having the same sex distribution (54.5% vs. 55.0% female) and longer follow-up time (36.9 vs. 42.6 months). We did not find significant differences in cancer survival (5-year overall survival, P = 0.771) and the response rates (Overall Remission Rate; McNemar’s test, P = 0.346) between both collectives. CONCLUSION: Contrary to prior reports, we found no significant differences in cancer survival between German patients with immigrant background and native German patients. Nevertheless, the advanced treatment protocols implemented at our comprehensive cancer center may possibly account for the low variance in outcome. To conduct similar studies with a broader perspective, we propose that certain risk factors (country-of-origin-specific infections, dietary habits, epigenetics for chronic diseases etc.) should be considered, specially in the future studies that will recruit new arrivals from the 2015 German refugee crisis. BioMed Central 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8108356/ /pubmed/33971845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08141-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rüdiger, Roman
Geiser, Franziska
Ritter, Manuel
Brossart, Peter
Keyver-Paik, Mignon-Denise
Faridi, Andree
Vatter, Hartmut
Bootz, Friedrich
Landsberg, Jennifer
Kalff, Jörg C.
Herrlinger, Ulrich
Kristiansen, Glen
Pietsch, Torsten
Aretz, Stefan
Thomas, Daniel
Radbruch, Lukas
Kramer, Franz-Josef
Strassburg, Christian P.
Gonzalez-Carmona, Maria
Skowasch, Dirk
Essler, Markus
Schmid, Matthias
Nadal, Jennifer
Ernstmann, Nicole
Sharma, Amit
Funke, Benjamin
Schmidt-Wolf, Ingo G. H.
No evidence to support the impact of migration background on treatment response rates and cancer survival: a retrospective matched-pair analysis in Germany
title No evidence to support the impact of migration background on treatment response rates and cancer survival: a retrospective matched-pair analysis in Germany
title_full No evidence to support the impact of migration background on treatment response rates and cancer survival: a retrospective matched-pair analysis in Germany
title_fullStr No evidence to support the impact of migration background on treatment response rates and cancer survival: a retrospective matched-pair analysis in Germany
title_full_unstemmed No evidence to support the impact of migration background on treatment response rates and cancer survival: a retrospective matched-pair analysis in Germany
title_short No evidence to support the impact of migration background on treatment response rates and cancer survival: a retrospective matched-pair analysis in Germany
title_sort no evidence to support the impact of migration background on treatment response rates and cancer survival: a retrospective matched-pair analysis in germany
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33971845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08141-8
work_keys_str_mv AT rudigerroman noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT geiserfranziska noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT rittermanuel noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT brossartpeter noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT keyverpaikmignondenise noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT faridiandree noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT vatterhartmut noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT bootzfriedrich noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT landsbergjennifer noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT kalffjorgc noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT herrlingerulrich noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT kristiansenglen noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT pietschtorsten noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT aretzstefan noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT thomasdaniel noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT radbruchlukas noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT kramerfranzjosef noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT strassburgchristianp noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT gonzalezcarmonamaria noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT skowaschdirk noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT esslermarkus noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT schmidmatthias noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT nadaljennifer noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT ernstmannnicole noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT sharmaamit noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT funkebenjamin noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany
AT schmidtwolfingogh noevidencetosupporttheimpactofmigrationbackgroundontreatmentresponseratesandcancersurvivalaretrospectivematchedpairanalysisingermany