Cargando…
COVID-19 and the multidisciplinary care of patients with lung cancer: an evidence-based review and commentary
Delivering lung cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant and ongoing challenges. There is a lack of published COVID-19 and lung cancer evidence-based reviews, including for the whole patient pathway. We searched for COVID-19 and lung cancer publications and brought together a m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33972746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01361-6 |
_version_ | 1783690129282433024 |
---|---|
author | Round, Thomas L’Esperance, Veline Bayly, Joanne Brain, Kate Dallas, Lorraine Edwards, John G. Haswell, Thomas Hiley, Crispin Lovell, Natasha McAdam, Julia McCutchan, Grace Nair, Arjun Newsom-Davis, Thomas Sage, Elizabeth K. Navani, Neal |
author_facet | Round, Thomas L’Esperance, Veline Bayly, Joanne Brain, Kate Dallas, Lorraine Edwards, John G. Haswell, Thomas Hiley, Crispin Lovell, Natasha McAdam, Julia McCutchan, Grace Nair, Arjun Newsom-Davis, Thomas Sage, Elizabeth K. Navani, Neal |
author_sort | Round, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Delivering lung cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant and ongoing challenges. There is a lack of published COVID-19 and lung cancer evidence-based reviews, including for the whole patient pathway. We searched for COVID-19 and lung cancer publications and brought together a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders to review and comment on the evidence and challenges. A rapid review of the literature was undertaken up to 28 October 2020, producing 144 papers, with 113 full texts screened. We focused on new primary data collection (qualitative or quantitative evidence) and excluded case reports, editorials and commentaries. Following exclusions, 15 published papers were included in the review and are summarised. They included one qualitative paper and 14 quantitative studies (surveys or cohort studies), with a total of 2295 lung cancer patients data included (mean study size 153 patients; range 7–803). Review of current evidence and commentary included awareness and help-seeking; lung cancer screening; primary care assessment and referral; diagnosis and treatment in secondary care, including oncology and surgery; patient experience and palliative care. Cross-cutting themes and challenges were identified using qualitative methods for patients, healthcare professionals and service delivery, with a clear need for continued studies to guide evidence-based decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8108433 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81084332021-05-11 COVID-19 and the multidisciplinary care of patients with lung cancer: an evidence-based review and commentary Round, Thomas L’Esperance, Veline Bayly, Joanne Brain, Kate Dallas, Lorraine Edwards, John G. Haswell, Thomas Hiley, Crispin Lovell, Natasha McAdam, Julia McCutchan, Grace Nair, Arjun Newsom-Davis, Thomas Sage, Elizabeth K. Navani, Neal Br J Cancer Review Article Delivering lung cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant and ongoing challenges. There is a lack of published COVID-19 and lung cancer evidence-based reviews, including for the whole patient pathway. We searched for COVID-19 and lung cancer publications and brought together a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders to review and comment on the evidence and challenges. A rapid review of the literature was undertaken up to 28 October 2020, producing 144 papers, with 113 full texts screened. We focused on new primary data collection (qualitative or quantitative evidence) and excluded case reports, editorials and commentaries. Following exclusions, 15 published papers were included in the review and are summarised. They included one qualitative paper and 14 quantitative studies (surveys or cohort studies), with a total of 2295 lung cancer patients data included (mean study size 153 patients; range 7–803). Review of current evidence and commentary included awareness and help-seeking; lung cancer screening; primary care assessment and referral; diagnosis and treatment in secondary care, including oncology and surgery; patient experience and palliative care. Cross-cutting themes and challenges were identified using qualitative methods for patients, healthcare professionals and service delivery, with a clear need for continued studies to guide evidence-based decision-making. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-10 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8108433/ /pubmed/33972746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01361-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Cancer Research UK 2021 |
spellingShingle | Review Article Round, Thomas L’Esperance, Veline Bayly, Joanne Brain, Kate Dallas, Lorraine Edwards, John G. Haswell, Thomas Hiley, Crispin Lovell, Natasha McAdam, Julia McCutchan, Grace Nair, Arjun Newsom-Davis, Thomas Sage, Elizabeth K. Navani, Neal COVID-19 and the multidisciplinary care of patients with lung cancer: an evidence-based review and commentary |
title | COVID-19 and the multidisciplinary care of patients with lung cancer: an evidence-based review and commentary |
title_full | COVID-19 and the multidisciplinary care of patients with lung cancer: an evidence-based review and commentary |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 and the multidisciplinary care of patients with lung cancer: an evidence-based review and commentary |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 and the multidisciplinary care of patients with lung cancer: an evidence-based review and commentary |
title_short | COVID-19 and the multidisciplinary care of patients with lung cancer: an evidence-based review and commentary |
title_sort | covid-19 and the multidisciplinary care of patients with lung cancer: an evidence-based review and commentary |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33972746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01361-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roundthomas covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary AT lesperanceveline covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary AT baylyjoanne covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary AT brainkate covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary AT dallaslorraine covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary AT edwardsjohng covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary AT haswellthomas covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary AT hileycrispin covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary AT lovellnatasha covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary AT mcadamjulia covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary AT mccutchangrace covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary AT nairarjun covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary AT newsomdavisthomas covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary AT sageelizabethk covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary AT navanineal covid19andthemultidisciplinarycareofpatientswithlungcanceranevidencebasedreviewandcommentary |