Cargando…

Developing a Model of Graduate Teaching Assistant Teacher Efficacy: How Do High and Low Teacher Efficacy Teaching Assistants Compare?

Graduate teaching assistants (TAs) are often responsible for teaching introductory courses to undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics students. The TAs are usually novices at teaching, and an important factor in their resilience and persistence in the face of inevitable chall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Cody R., Delgado, Cesar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Cell Biology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33444107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-05-0096
_version_ 1783690140826206208
author Smith, Cody R.
Delgado, Cesar
author_facet Smith, Cody R.
Delgado, Cesar
author_sort Smith, Cody R.
collection PubMed
description Graduate teaching assistants (TAs) are often responsible for teaching introductory courses to undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics students. The TAs are usually novices at teaching, and an important factor in their resilience and persistence in the face of inevitable challenges is self-efficacy. Little is known about what affects TA teacher efficacy or whether and how high- and low-efficacy TAs differ in their development as teachers. Bridging these gaps in the literature will inform best practices in developing and implementing professional development (PD) for TAs. Using a mixed-methods sequential exploratory research design, this study found differences in high- and low-efficacy TAs in both TAs’ self-reflection and their students’ perceptions. These differences concerned the focus of TAs’ attention: inward at their own practices and emotions (salient in low-efficacy TAs) versus outward at the impact of their instructional guidance on their learners (prevalent in high-efficacy TAs). A proposed model of teacher efficacy based on TAs but generally applicable is presented to inform future research and provide suggestions for TA PD opportunities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8108498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81084982021-05-11 Developing a Model of Graduate Teaching Assistant Teacher Efficacy: How Do High and Low Teacher Efficacy Teaching Assistants Compare? Smith, Cody R. Delgado, Cesar CBE Life Sci Educ General Essays and Articles Graduate teaching assistants (TAs) are often responsible for teaching introductory courses to undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics students. The TAs are usually novices at teaching, and an important factor in their resilience and persistence in the face of inevitable challenges is self-efficacy. Little is known about what affects TA teacher efficacy or whether and how high- and low-efficacy TAs differ in their development as teachers. Bridging these gaps in the literature will inform best practices in developing and implementing professional development (PD) for TAs. Using a mixed-methods sequential exploratory research design, this study found differences in high- and low-efficacy TAs in both TAs’ self-reflection and their students’ perceptions. These differences concerned the focus of TAs’ attention: inward at their own practices and emotions (salient in low-efficacy TAs) versus outward at the impact of their instructional guidance on their learners (prevalent in high-efficacy TAs). A proposed model of teacher efficacy based on TAs but generally applicable is presented to inform future research and provide suggestions for TA PD opportunities. American Society for Cell Biology 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8108498/ /pubmed/33444107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-05-0096 Text en © 2021 C. R. Smith and C. Delgado. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2021 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle General Essays and Articles
Smith, Cody R.
Delgado, Cesar
Developing a Model of Graduate Teaching Assistant Teacher Efficacy: How Do High and Low Teacher Efficacy Teaching Assistants Compare?
title Developing a Model of Graduate Teaching Assistant Teacher Efficacy: How Do High and Low Teacher Efficacy Teaching Assistants Compare?
title_full Developing a Model of Graduate Teaching Assistant Teacher Efficacy: How Do High and Low Teacher Efficacy Teaching Assistants Compare?
title_fullStr Developing a Model of Graduate Teaching Assistant Teacher Efficacy: How Do High and Low Teacher Efficacy Teaching Assistants Compare?
title_full_unstemmed Developing a Model of Graduate Teaching Assistant Teacher Efficacy: How Do High and Low Teacher Efficacy Teaching Assistants Compare?
title_short Developing a Model of Graduate Teaching Assistant Teacher Efficacy: How Do High and Low Teacher Efficacy Teaching Assistants Compare?
title_sort developing a model of graduate teaching assistant teacher efficacy: how do high and low teacher efficacy teaching assistants compare?
topic General Essays and Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33444107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-05-0096
work_keys_str_mv AT smithcodyr developingamodelofgraduateteachingassistantteacherefficacyhowdohighandlowteacherefficacyteachingassistantscompare
AT delgadocesar developingamodelofgraduateteachingassistantteacherefficacyhowdohighandlowteacherefficacyteachingassistantscompare